Report and Recommendations of an International Workshop on Promotion of the Regulatory Acceptance of Validated Non-animal Toxicity Test Procedures

1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (1_part_1) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Balls ◽  
Philip Botham ◽  
André Cordier ◽  
Silvano Fumero ◽  
Detlef Kayser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Toxicity Test ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Animal Toxicity ◽  
Regulatory Acceptance

Report and Recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT Workshop on the Validation of Toxicity Test Procedures

1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (1_part_1) ◽  
pp. 313-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Balls ◽  
Bas Blaauboer ◽  
David Brusick ◽  
John Frazier ◽  
Denise Lamb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Toxicity Test ◽  
Test Procedures

Application of whole effluent toxicity test procedures to ambient water quality assessment

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor de Vlaming ◽  
Valerie Connor ◽  
Carol DiGiorgio ◽  
Howard C. Bailey ◽  
Linda A. Deanovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Toxicity Test ◽  
Water Quality Assessment ◽  
Ambient Water ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Whole Effluent Toxicity ◽  
Effluent Toxicity

Comments on Labelling Related to the Animal Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and Products Manufactured and/or Marketed within the European Economic Community

1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-307
Author(s):  
Michael Balls
Keyword(s):  
Animal Welfare ◽  
European Economic Community ◽  
Toxicity Tests ◽  
Economic Community ◽  
Animal Testing ◽  
European Economic ◽  
Testing Strategies ◽  
Cosmetic Ingredients ◽  
Animal Toxicity ◽  
Regulatory Acceptance

The use of terms such as “cruelty-free” and “not tested on animals” in relation to cosmetic ingredients and products is reviewed. It is concluded that, such is the confusion that has been engendered by their misuse, legitimate concerns for both human and animal welfare are compromised, and unfair trading practices are in operation. It is proposed that such misleading terminology should be prohibited within the EEC, and that more effort should be put into the development, validation and regulatory acceptance of non-animal toxicity tests and testing strategies.

* DEVELOPMENT OF TOXICITY TEST PROCEDURES FOR MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON

1971 ◽  
Vol 1971 (1) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Strand ◽  
W.L. Templeton ◽  
J.A. Lichatowich ◽  
C. W. Apts
Keyword(s):  
Toxicity Test ◽  
Tentative Method ◽  
Marine Phytoplankton ◽  
Industrial Wastes ◽  
Relative Toxicity ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Oil Dispersant ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Marine Primary Productivity ◽  
American Society

ABSTRACT Recommended bioassay procedures are presented that can be routinely applied to evaluate the relative toxicity of oil, chemical dispersants, and oil-dispersant mixtures to 1) naturally occurring populations of phytoplankton, and 2) representative marine phytoplankters grown in pure culture. The methods presented, in general, represent 1) application of techniques routinely employed in the measurement of marine primary productivity, and 2) application of the Inhibitory Toxicity Test, a tentative method devised by the American Society for Testing and Materials to evaluate acute toxicity of industrial wastes to diatoms.

Considerations on photochemical genotoxicity: Report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures Working Group

2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmar Gocke ◽  
Lutz M�ller ◽  
Peggy J. Guzzie ◽  
Susanne Brendler-Schwaab ◽  
Steven Bulera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Genotoxicity Test

EVALUATION OF REDUCED SEDIMENT VOLUME TOXICITY TEST PROCEDURES USING THE MARINE AMPHIPOD AMPELISCA ABDITA

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2372 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Ferretti ◽  
Diane F. Calesso ◽  
James M. Lazorchak ◽  
Curtis O. Durham
Keyword(s):  
Toxicity Test ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Sediment Volume ◽  
Marine Amphipod
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document