Muscle strength testing with one repetition maximum in the arm/shoulder for people aged 75 + - test-retest reliability

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Rydwik ◽  
C Karlsson ◽  
K Frändin ◽  
G Akner
2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 540-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Burns ◽  
Anthony Redmond ◽  
Robert Ouvrier ◽  
Jack Crosbie

Background: Pes cavus foot deformity in neuromuscular disease is thought to be related to an imbalance of musculature around the foot and ankle. The most common cause of neurogenic pes cavus is Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. The aim of this investigation was to objectively quantify muscle strength and imbalance using hand-held dynamometry in patients diagnosed with CMT and pes cavus, compared to healthy controls. Methods: Muscles responsible for inversion, eversion, plantarflexion, and dorsiflexion of the foot and ankle were measured in 55 subjects (11 CMT patients with a frank pes cavus, and 44 healthy controls with normal feet) using the Nicholas hand-held dynamometer (HHD). Test-retest reliability of the HHD procedure also was determined for each of the four muscle groups in the healthy controls. Results: Test-retest reliability of the HHD procedure was excellent (ICC3,1 = 0.88 to 0.95) and the measurement error was low (SEM = 0.3 to 0.7 kg). Patients with CMT were significantly weaker than normal for all foot and ankle muscle groups tested ( p <0.001). Strength ratios of inversion-to-eversion and plantarflexion-to-dorsiflexion were significantly higher in the patients with CMT and pes cavus compared to individuals with normal foot types ( p > 0.01). Conclusions: Hand-held dynamometry is an objective and reliable instrument to measure muscle strength and imbalance in patients with CMT and a pes cavus foot deformity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 205031211668884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy T Harding ◽  
Benjamin Kurt Weeks ◽  
Sean A Horan ◽  
Andrew Little ◽  
Steven L Watson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 888-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy F.M. Aertssen ◽  
Gillian D. Ferguson ◽  
Bouwien C.M. Smits-Engelsman

Background Adequate muscle strength, power, and endurance are important in children's daily activities and sports. Various instruments have been developed for the assessment of muscle function; each measures different aspects. The Functional Strength Measurement (FSM) was developed to measure performance in activities in which strength is required. Objective The study objective was to establish the test-retest reliability and structural and construct validity of the FSM. Design A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Methods The performance of 474 children with typical development on the FSM was examined. Test-retest reliability (n=47) was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (2.1A) for agreement. Structural validity was examined with exploratory factor analysis, and internal consistency was established with the Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was determined by calculating correlations between FSM scores and scores obtained with a handheld dynamometer (HHD) (n=252) (convergent validity) and between FSM scores and scores on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–2 (MABC-2) (n=77) (discriminant validity). Results The test-retest reliability of the FSM total score ranged from .91 to .94. The structural validity revealed one dimension, containing all 8 FSM items. The Cronbach alpha was .74. The convergent validity with the HHD ranged from .42 to .74. The discriminant validity with MABC-2 items revealed correlations that were generally lower than .39, and most of the correlations were not significant. Exploratory factor analysis of a combined data set (FSM, HHD, and MABC-2; n=77) revealed 2 factors: muscle strength/power and muscle endurance with an agility component. Limitations Discriminant validity was measured only in children aged 4 to 6 years. Conclusions The FSM, a norm-referenced test for measuring functional strength in children aged 4 to 10 years, has good test-retest reliability and good construct validity.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel A. Infante ◽  
Giovanna M. Harrell ◽  
Keri L. Strand ◽  
Rosalia L. Parrino ◽  
Joseph F. Signorile

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrine Tranaas Vannebo ◽  
Vegard Moe Iversen ◽  
Marius Steiro Fimland ◽  
Paul Jarle Mork

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document