The inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the Functional Independence Measure for multiple sclerosis subjects

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Brosseau ◽  
Christina Wolfson
Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Cecilia Estrada-Barranco ◽  
Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda ◽  
Vanesa Abuín-Porras ◽  
Francisco Molina-Rueda

(1) Background: Observational scales are the most common methodology used to assess postural control and balance in people with stroke. The aim of this paper was to analyse the construct validity of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) scale in post-stroke patients in the acute, subacute, and chronic stroke phases. (2) Methods: Sixty-one post-stroke participants were enrolled. To analyze the construct validity of the PASS, the following scales were used: the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC), the Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS), the Barthel Index (BI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). (3) Results: The construct validity of the PASS scale in patients with stroke at acute phase was moderate with the FAC (r = −0.791), WGS (r = −0.646) and FIM (r = −0.678) and excellent with the BI (r = 0.801). At subacute stage, the construct validity of the PASS scale was excellent with the FAC (r = 0.897), WGS (r = −0.847), FIM (r = −0.810) and BI (r = −0.888). At 6 and 12 months, the construct validity of the PASS with the FAC, WGS, FIM and BI was also excellent. (4) Conclusions: The PASS scale is a valid instrument to assess balance in post-stroke individuals especially, in the subacute and chronic phases (at 6 and 12 months).


1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Brosseau ◽  
Louise Potvin ◽  
Pierre Philippe ◽  
Yves-Louis Boulanger ◽  
Elisabeth Dutil

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Moreira de Sousa ◽  
Edinangela Silva de Oliveira ◽  
Nisi Alessandra de Carvalho Sousa ◽  
Guilherme Peixoto Tinoco Arêas ◽  
Fernando Zanela da Silva Arêas

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated, inflammatory disease characterized by repeated episodes of demyelization. Objective: The present study aimed to trace the epidemiological and functional profile of patients with Multiple Sclerosis treated at a Reference Hospital in Manaus-AM. Method: 80 charts were selected for screening and subsequent application of the Functional Independence Measure (MIF) scale. Results: 32 patients were included in the study, 23 females (74%), whose mean age was 35 (± 12) years, with a relationship between females and males of 2.5. The mean diagnostic time for men was 7.8 years and for women of 5.3 years. The mean score on the Total MIF scale was 110.9 (± 17.5). Conclusion: Epidemiological characteristics are in line with most similar studies, but lack further studies aimed at assessing the functionality of individuals with MS.


2002 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16
Author(s):  
Áine Carroll ◽  
Paul Mattison ◽  
Catherine Comiskey

A random sample of the referral notes of 35 multiple sclerosis patients experiencing relapse and referred via the current general practitioner (GP) system was reviewed. The time between receipt of the referral and assessment/admission (lead time) was examined. The mean value was obtained and a self referral system was initiated and monitored for a period of five months. The mean referral times were compared. The patients' disability status before and after treatment was measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and we invited the patients' opinions about the self-referral system. The goals of the newly implemented self-referral system were to reduce lead time to less than 6.5 days, improve patient disability, and avoid inappropriate referral; the new system was also to be “user friendly.” The new system reduced referral times by a statistically significant amount (P = 0.0016). There was a significant objective improvement in patients' disability as measured by the EDSS and FIM scores (P = 0.031 and P = 0.04, respectively). There was a subjective improvement, and patients expressed a preference for the new system. There were no inappropriate referrals. These findings suggest that the self-referral system is efficient and effective and should be further evaluated. (Int J MS Care. 2002; 4: 10–12)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document