scholarly journals ‘Traversing difficult terrain’. Advance care planning in residential aged care through multidisciplinary case conferences: A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of families, staff and health professionals

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110132
Author(s):  
Suzanne Rainsford ◽  
Sally Hall Dykgraaf ◽  
Rosny Kasim ◽  
Christine Phillips ◽  
Nicholas Glasgow
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Shared Responsibility ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
Case Conferences ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Advance care planning improves the quality of end-of-life care for older persons in residential aged care; however, its uptake is low. Case conferencing facilitates advance care planning. Aim: To explore the experience of participating in advance care planning discussions facilitated through multidisciplinary case conferences from the perspectives of families, staff and health professionals. Design: A qualitative study (February–July 2019) using semi-structured interviews. Setting: Two residential aged care facilities in one Australian rural town. Participants: Fifteen informants [family ( n = 4), staff ( n = 5), health professionals ( n = 6)] who had participated in advance care planning discussions facilitated through multidisciplinary case conferences. Results: Advance care planning was like navigating an emotional landscape while facing the looming loss of a loved one. This emotional burden was exacerbated for substitute decision-makers, but made easier if the resident had capacity to be involved or had previously made their wishes clearly known. The ‘conversation’ was not a simple task, and required preparation time. Multidisciplinary case conferences facilitated informed decision-making and shared responsibility. Opportunity to consider all care options provided families with clarity, control and a sense of comfort. This enabled multiple stakeholders to bond and connect around the resident. Conclusion: While advance care planning is an important element of high quality care it involves significant emotional labour and burden for families, care staff and health professionals. It is not a simple administrative task to be completed, but a process that requires time and space for reflection and consensus-building to support well-considered decisions. Multidisciplinary case conferences support this process.

Understanding how advance care planning is approached in the residential aged care setting: A continuum model of practice as an explanatory device

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Shanley ◽  
Elizabeth Whitmore ◽  
Angela Khoo ◽  
Colleen Cartwright ◽  
Amanda Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Continuum Model ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Model Of Practice

How is advance care planning conceptualised in Australia? Findings from key informant interviews

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel J. Rhee ◽  
Nicholas A. Zwar
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

Objective. Advance Care Planning (ACP) has been gaining prominence as an important component of good end-of-life care. This study explored how ACP is conceptualised by stakeholder organisations and clinicians involved in aged care and end-of-life care in Australia, in particular their views on the aim, appropriate context and settings for ACP, and how ACP should be facilitated. Participants. Twenty-three participants including expert clinicians and representatives of government organisations, professional societies, consumer groups and other organisations involved in aged care and end-of-life care. Design. Qualitative descriptive analysis of semi-structured telephone interviews. Results. Most participants viewed ACP as an ongoing process aimed at enhancing an individual’s autonomy and ensuring good end-of-life care. However, there were significant differences in how this process was conceptualised. Some viewed ACP as a process undertaken by patients to define and communicate their treatment preferences. Others viewed ACP as discussions undertaken by health professionals to gain a better understanding of the patient’s values and goals in order to provide good care. Implications. Our findings highlight significant differences in how ACP is conceptualised in Australia. A shared conceptualisation and agreement on purpose is needed to ensure a successful implementation of ACP in Australia. What is known about the topic? Advance care planning (ACP) has been gaining increasing prominence both internationally and in Australia and is seen as an important component of good end-of-life care. Originally conceptualised as a document outlining a patient’s specific treatment preferences about life-sustaining treatments, ACP has been increasingly recognised in the literature as an ongoing process of discussion, communication and documentation of the patient’s wishes and values regarding end-of-life care. What does this paper add? This paper shows that most expert clinicians and representatives of key stakeholder organisations view ACP as a process that aims to enhance individual autonomy and ensure good end-of-life care. However, our findings show that they often hold contrasting views on ACP – ranging from a consumer-orientated view that sees ACP as undertaken to define and communicate their care preferences; to a care-orientated view that sees ACP as discussions led by health professionals in order to gain an understanding of patients’ values and wishes in order to provide better care. What are the implications for practitioners? Our findings highlight significant differences in how ACP is conceptualised in Australia. This can cause confusion and conflict, leading to reduced effectiveness of ACP. A shared conceptualisation and agreement on purpose is needed to ensure a successful implementation of ACP in Australia.

scholarly journals Advance care planning participation by people with dementia: a cross-sectional survey and medical record audit

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002550
Author(s):  
Jamie Bryant ◽  
Marcus Sellars ◽  
Amy Waller ◽  
Karen Detering ◽  
Craig Sinclair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Substitute Decision Maker ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Advance Care

ObjectivesTo describe among individuals with dementia: (1) self-reported awareness of, and engagement in, advance care planning; (2) presence of advance care planning documentation in the health record and (3) concordance between self-reported completion of advance care planning and presence of documentation in the health record.MethodsAn Australian prospective multicentre audit and cross-sectional survey. Individuals diagnosed with dementia who were able to speak English and were judged by a healthcare provider as having decision-making capacity were recruited from self-selected hospitals, residential aged care facilities and general practices across Australia.ResultsFifty-two people with dementia completed surveys and were included. Overall, 59.6% of participants had heard about advance care planning and 55.8% had discussed advance care planning with someone, most often a family member (48.1%). While 38.5% of participants had appointed a medical substitute decision maker, only 26.9% reported that they had written down their values and preferences for future care. Concordance between self-reported completion of advance care planning and presence of documentation in the health record was low (56.8%, κ=0.139; 57.7%, κ=0.053).ConclusionEffective models that promote discussion, documentation and accessible storage of advance care planning documents for people with dementia are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document