Automaticity of smoking behaviour: the relationship between dual-task performance, daily cigarette intake and subjective nicotine effects

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 799-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Field ◽  
Karin Mogg ◽  
Brendan P. Bradley
2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (10) ◽  
pp. e68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Keightley ◽  
Katia J. Sinopoli ◽  
Jen-Kai Chen ◽  
Alain Ptito ◽  
Tim Taha ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Gladstones ◽  
Michael A. Regan ◽  
Robert B. Lee

Two experiments are reported in which subjects performed two forced-paced serial reaction time tasks separately and together at their maximum sustainable rates of information processing. Experiment 1 investigated the effects on the relationship between single- and dual-task performance of using tasks with the same or different input and output modality characteristics; an additional condition tested the effects on this relationship of using tasks with higher S–R compatibility. Experiment 2 investigated the effects on the relationship between single- and dual-task performance of varying information load (number of S–R alternatives). No significant differences were found in subjects’ capacities to process information in single- and dual-task conditions. This finding was unaffected by: (a) the absolute information levels of the tasks, (b) whether inputs and/or outputs involved the same or different modalities, or (c) the level of S–R compatibility. The data from both experiments provide strong support for the single-channel hypothesis.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Oberauer ◽  
Katrin Gothe ◽  
Reinhold Kliegl

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra J. Thomson ◽  
Matthew T. Mazurek ◽  
Judith M. Shedden ◽  
Scott Watter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document