Diversity and Eclecticism in the Teaching of Organizational Theory

1981 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-318
Author(s):  
Steven W. Hays ◽  
Richard C. Kearney
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Litwak ◽  
Peter Messeri ◽  
Samuel Wolfe ◽  
Sheila Gorman ◽  
Merril Silverstein ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-53
Author(s):  
Brooke Borgognoni ◽  
Jan LeBlanc Wicks

This survey of faculty advisers examined major variables and findings of past research on student-run agencies using organizational theory. Larger agencies appeared to offer training in more formalized business procedures among a more diverse client base, found in previous research to be helpful to student-run agency graduates now on the job. Hopefully, results will help future researchers identify which factors may best facilitate specific student performance outcomes at agencies of all types and sizes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 263178772095444
Author(s):  
François Cooren

Although we have to welcome the renewed interest in socio-materiality in organization studies, I claim that we are yet to understand what taking matter seriously really means. The mistake we especially need to stop making consists of automatically associating matter to something that can be touched or seen, that is, something tangible or visible, an association that irremediably leads us to recreate a dissociation between the world of human affairs and the so-called material world. To address this issue, I mobilize a communication-centered perspective to elaborate that (1) materiality is a property of all (organizational) phenomena and that (2) studying these phenomena implies a focus on processes of materialization, that is, ways by which various beings come to appear and make themselves present throughout space and time. In the paper I conceptualize the contours of these materialization processes and discuss the implications of this perspective on materiality for organizational theory and research.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damiano Bonardo ◽  
Stefano Paleari ◽  
Silvio Vismara

Companies obtain significant benefits and resources from university affiliations. Building on recent contributions in organizational theory and signalling theory, the authors argue that such relationships redress investors' concerns over the legitimacy of firms and act as an uncertainty-reducing signal. They study the population of university spin-offs that have gone public in Europe over the last decade, and find that academic affiliation reduces uncertainty and enhances the chances of survival in the long term, controlling for characteristics related to firm quality, including measures of intellectual and relational capital as well as corporate governance mechanisms. Thus, external stakeholders consider academic affiliation as a valuable and non-substitutable resource.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document