scholarly journals Stability of two anterior fixations for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine: biomechanical evaluation of anterior pedicle screw-plate fixation

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1455-1460
Author(s):  
Hai-hao Wu ◽  
Tao Tang ◽  
Xiao Yu ◽  
Qing-jiang Pang

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the stability of anterior pedicle screw-plate (APSP) fixation and anterior vertebral body screw-plate (AVBSP) fixation for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine. Methods Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens of the lower cervical spine were prepared. After measurement of the range of motion (ROM) in the intact state, the specimens were prepared as three-column injury models. The models were stabilized by AVBSP or APSP fixation. The ROM of the models in the two states was measured. The ROM in the two states was compared. Results The ROM of the intact state in all directions was significantly smaller than that of the AVBSP state and significantly larger than that of the APSP state. The ROM of the AVBSP state in all directions was significantly larger than that of the APSP state. Conclusions This study shows that APSP fixation can provide sufficient stability for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine. The primary stability of our models using APSP fixation is superior to that of AVBSP fixation. These results suggest that APSP can be used for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine.

2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110335
Author(s):  
Sarah Ettinger ◽  
Lisa-Christin Hemmersbach ◽  
Michael Schwarze ◽  
Christina Stukenborg-Colsman ◽  
Daiwei Yao ◽  
...  

Background: Tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis is a common operative procedure for end-stage arthritis of the TMT joints. To date, there is no consensus on the best fixation technique for TMT arthrodesis and which joints should be included. Methods: Thirty fresh-frozen feet were divided into one group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with a lag screw and locking plate and a second group (15 feet) in which TMT joints I-III were fused with 2 crossing lag screws. The arthrodesis was performed stepwise with evaluation of mobility between the metatarsal and cuneiform bones after every application or removal of a lag screw or locking plate. Results: Isolated lag-screw arthrodesis of the TMT I-III joints led to significantly increased stability in every joint ( P < .05). Additional application of a locking plate caused further stability in every TMT joint ( P < .05). An additional crossed lag screw did not significantly increase rigidity of the TMT II and III joints ( P > .05). An IM screw did not influence the stability of the fused TMT joints. For TMT III arthrodesis, lag-screw and locking plate constructs were superior to crossed lag-screw fixation ( P < .05). TMT I fusion does not support stability after TMT II and III arthrodesis. Conclusion: Each fixation technique provided sufficient stabilization of the TMT joints. Use of a lag screw plus locking plate might be superior to crossed screw fixation. An additional TMT I and/or III arthrodesis did not increase stability of an isolated TMT II arthrodesis. Clinical Relevance: We report the first biomechanical evaluation of TMT I-III arthrodesis. Our results may help surgeons to choose among osteosynthesis techniques and which joints to include in performing arthrodesis of TMT I-III joints.


1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 297-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Dohm ◽  
James B. Benjamin ◽  
Jeffrey Harrison ◽  
John A. Szivek

A biomechanical study was undertaken to evaluate the relative stability of three types of internal fixation used for ankle arthrodesis. Crossed screw fixation, RAF fibular strut fixation, and T-plate fixation were tested in 30 cadaver ankles using an MTS machine. T-plate fixation consistantly provided the stiffest construct when compared with the other types of fixation. Failure occurred by distraction of bony surfaces, posterior to the plane of fixation, in the crossed screw and RAF groups. In contrast, failure in the T-plate group occurred through compression of bone anterior to the midcoronal plane of the tibia. Although the stability of fixation is only one factor in determining the success or failure of ankle arthrodesis, the results of this study would support T-plate fixation over the other forms tested.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2l) ◽  
pp. 807-811
Author(s):  
Chaudhary P ◽  
Khanal GP ◽  
Rijal R, Maharjan R ◽  
Paneru S ◽  
Kalawar RPS ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Min Dai ◽  
Han-chu Xiong ◽  
Song Gao ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to explore a safe, reliable, and effective method for pedicle screw implantation in the lower cervical spine. Recently, a number of studies have shown that cervical pedicle screw fixation is better than roadside steel plate after cervical screw internal fixation within the scope of its indications. However, the difficulty of the former surgery technology is relatively higher and it is much easier to cause many complications. Therefore, domestic and foreign scholars have been positively exploring safer, easier operations and cheaper methods of pedicle screw implantation in the lower cervical spine. The lower cervical spine areas (C3–C7) of 7 adult cadavers were carried out with computed tomography (CT) scans of 1-mm slices. The entry point, angle, and length of the screws were determined by the measurement of CT images in a picture archiving and communication system. The pedicle screws were implanted with the technique of improved Abumi pedicle screw placement in the lab. The accuracy of the screws was evaluated by the Andrew CT classification criteria of pedicle screw position and gross observation after the experiment. A total of 66 screws were implanted in the lower cervical spine, and 90.9% of the screws inserted were found to be in an optimal position. The method of individualized and improved pedicle screw implantation in the lower cervical spine is relatively safe and reliable, which can be considered to be used in the clinic.


2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong-ming Xu ◽  
Wei-hu Ma ◽  
Qing Wang ◽  
Liu-jun Zhao ◽  
Yong Hu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document