Role of Double-contrast Barium Enema in Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Fecal Occult Blood

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Ciatto ◽  
Guido Castiglione
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1492-1501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Guittet ◽  
Elodie Guillaume ◽  
Romuald Levillain ◽  
Philippe Beley ◽  
Jean Tichet ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Yao Wang ◽  
Ting-Wei Lin ◽  
Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu ◽  
Wan-Ying Lin ◽  
Song-Bin Huang ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening by fecal occult blood testing has been an important public health test and shown to reduce colorectal cancer–related mortality. However, the low participation rate in colorectal cancer screening by the general public remains a problematic public health issue. This fact could be attributed to the complex and unpleasant operation of the screening tool. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to validate a novel toilet paper–based point-of-care test (ie, JustWipe) as a public health instrument to detect fecal occult blood and provide detailed results from the evaluation of the analytic characteristics in the clinical validation. METHODS The mechanism of fecal specimen collection by the toilet-paper device was verified with repeatability and reproducibility tests. We also evaluated the analytical characteristics of the test reagents. For clinical validation, we conducted comparisons between JustWipe and other fecal occult blood tests. The first comparison was between JustWipe and typical fecal occult blood testing in a central laboratory setting with 70 fecal specimens from the hospital. For the second comparison, a total of 58 volunteers were recruited, and JustWipe was compared with the commercially available Hemoccult SENSA in a point-of-care setting. RESULTS Adequate amounts of fecal specimens were collected using the toilet-paper device with small day-to-day and person-to-person variations. The limit of detection of the test reagent was evaluated to be 3.75 µg of hemoglobin per milliliter of reagent. Moreover, the test reagent also showed high repeatability (100%) on different days and high reproducibility (>96%) among different users. The overall agreement between JustWipe and a typical fecal occult blood test in a central laboratory setting was 82.9%. In the setting of point-of-care tests, the overall agreement between JustWipe and Hemoccult SENSA was 89.7%. Moreover, the usability questionnaire showed that the novel test tool had high scores in operation friendliness (87.3/100), ease of reading results (97.4/100), and information usefulness (96.1/100). CONCLUSIONS We developed and validated a toilet paper–based fecal occult blood test for use as a point-of-care test for the rapid (in 60 seconds) and easy testing of fecal occult blood. These favorable characteristics render it a promising tool for colorectal cancer screening as a public health instrument.


2020 ◽  
pp. 096914132091915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ora Paltiel ◽  
Aravah Keidar Tirosh ◽  
Orit Paz Stostky ◽  
Ronit Calderon-Margalit ◽  
Arnon D Cohen ◽  
...  

Objectives To assess time trends in colorectal cancer screening uptake, time-to-colonoscopy completion following a positive fecal occult blood test and associated patient factors, and the extent and predictors of longitudinal screening adherence in Israel. Setting Nation-wide population-based study using data collected from four health maintenance organizations for the Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program. Methods Screening uptake for the eligible population (aged 50–74) was recorded 2003–2018 using aggregate data. For a subcohort (2008–2012, N = 1,342,617), time-to-colonoscopy following a positive fecal occult blood test and longitudinal adherence to screening guidelines were measured using individual-level data, and associated factors assessed in multivariate models. Results The annual proportion screened rose for both sexes from 11 to 65%, increasing five-fold for age group 60–74 and >six-fold for 50–59 year olds, respectively. From 2008 to 2012, 67,314 adults had a positive fecal occult blood test, of whom 71% eventually performed a colonoscopy after a median interval of 122 (95% confidence interval 110.2–113.7) days. Factors associated with time-to-colonoscopy included age, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. Only 25.5% of the population demonstrated full longitudinal screening adherence, mainly attributable to colonoscopy in the past 10 years rather than annual fecal occult blood test performance (83% versus 17%, respectively). Smoking, diabetes, lower socioeconomic status, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension were associated with decreased adherence. Performance of other cancer screening tests and frequent primary care visits were strongly associated with adherence. Conclusions Despite substantial improvement in colorectal cancer screening uptake on a population level, individual-level data uncovered gaps in colonoscopy completion after a positive fecal occult blood test and in longitudinal adherence to screening, which should be addressed using focused interventions.


1996 ◽  
Vol 334 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Allison ◽  
Irene S. Tekawa ◽  
Laura J. Ransom ◽  
Alyn L. Adrain

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document