Peritoneal Cystic Mesothelioma: A Case Series

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaiumarz Sethna ◽  
Faheez Mohamed ◽  
Pierre Marchettini ◽  
Dominique Elias ◽  
Paul H Sugarbaker

Background Cystic peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare disease associated with a favorable short-term prognosis. Longer follow-up documenting a persistence of symptoms and a high rate of recurrence after debulking surgery along with an uncertain natural history prompt a re-evaluation of prior treatment recommendations. No prior long-term clinical study of these patients is available. Methods The experience with five cases of cystic peritoneal mesothelioma, four females and one male, are reviewed. All of these patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery with peritonectomy procedures and heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. CT, pathology and current status were investigated in order to learn more about the natural history of this disease. Results All patients were symptomatic from abdominal distention and three of the four complained of severe pain. Female patients complained of long periods of recurrent abdominal and pelvic pain poorly managed by oral analgesics. In one patient prolonged conservative management over ten years resulted in transition to an invasive process with extensive lymph nodal metastases. Her prognosis for long-term survival is guarded because of mesothelioma extension into the chest. Disease control of both ascites and pain in the abdomen and pelvis was achieved in all five patients treated with cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Conclusions Cystic peritoneal mesothelioma should no longer be referred to as “benign” cystic mesothelioma. An aggressive approach with complete disease eradication is the correct goal of treatment. From our experience, cytoreductive surgery to remove all visible tumor and intraperitoneal chemotherapy to control microscopic residual disease will help patients with peritoneal cystic mesothelioma to remain symptom- and disease-free over an extended time period with a single surgical intervention. Disease eradication may prevent the transition to an aggressive and fatal disease process.

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Paul H ugarbaker ◽  

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare but aggressive disease with a poor sustained response to systemic chemotherapy. Historically, the median survival has been less than 1 year. The disease rarely disseminates outside of the peritoneal space suggesting that local-regional treatment options may be effective in the long-term control of this malignancy. Establishment of a referral center to concentrate experience with the management of this disease has contributed greatly to progress in its management.Materials and methods:Through a series of Institutional Review Board-approved protocols, a long-standing morbidity/mortality assessment, numerous manuscripts published in the peer-reviewed literature, and participation in numerous national and international workshops, a new standard of care with expectations of long-term survival in a majority of patients has evolved.Results:The surgery for this disease has evolved through a sequence of peritonectomy procedures and visceral resections whose goal is to remove all visible evidence of disease. The first step in successful treatment is a complete cytoreduction. After the cancer resection in the operating room, hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used. A three-drug protocol combines heat-augmented chemotherapy within the peritoneal space and systemic chemotherapy that is heat-augmented as a continuous infusion intravenously. Catheters are placed for early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using paclitaxel for 5 days. Also placed at the time of the cytoreductive surgery is an intraperitoneal port for long-term combined intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy using cisplatin and pemetrexed for 6 months. Patients having the long-term bidirectional chemotherapy have shown statistically significant improved survival compared with those patients who had surgery alone plus the perioperative chemotherapy. There have been no mortality and the grade 4 adverse events have been prospectively accumulated as 12 %.Conclusions:With continued effort, the surgery and long-term regional chemotherapy for DMPM has continued to improve over 20 years. Currently, a management plan that involves cytoreductive surgery, perioperative chemotherapy, and long-term bidirectional chemotherapy has changed the natural history of this disease. A global registry has been initiated to confirm the benefits of these extended treatments.


Author(s):  
Luigi Marano ◽  
◽  
Daniele Marrelli ◽  
Paolo Sammartino ◽  
Daniele Biacchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The development of multimodality treatment, including cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has led to promising results in selected patients with peritoneal disease of gastric origin. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of synchronous peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer. Methods The Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam—S.I.C.O. retrospective registry included patients with synchronous peritoneal malignancy from gastric cancer submitted to gastrectomy with CRS and HIPEC between 2005 and 2018 from 11 high-volume, specialized centers. Results A total of 91 patients with a median age of 58 years (range 26–75) were enrolled. The median overall survival (OS) time for the whole group of patients was 20.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.8–28.5] and the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 7.3 months (95% CI 4–10.6). The completeness of cytoreduction score (CCS) of 0 and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score of ≤ 6 groups showed a significantly better long-term survival (median OS 40.7 and 44.3 months, respectively) compared with the incomplete resected groups (median OS 10.7 months, p = 0.003) and PCI score of > 6 group (median OS 13.4 months, p = 0.005). A significant difference was observed in the survival rate according to neoadjuvant treatment (untreated patients: 10.7 months, 95% CI 5.1–16.2; treated patients: 35.3 months, 95% CI 2.8–67.8; p = 0.022). Conclusions In referral centers, CRS and HIPEC after neoadjuvant treatment significantly improved survival in selected patients. Patients with a PCI score ≤ 6, complete cytoreduction, negative nodal involvements, and negative cytology had encouraging results, showing a clinically meaningful survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document