Impact of waiting times on tumour growth and pathologic upstaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer having lung resection

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162096021
Author(s):  
Insha Bhat ◽  
Lawrence Okiror ◽  
Arjun Nair ◽  
Andrea Bille

Objective: There are limited data on tumour growth or pathologic upstaging in patients with early-stage lung cancer awaiting lung resection. We aimed to evaluate whether waiting times on the current lung cancer treatment pathway were associated with significant tumour growth or pathologic upstaging. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of a consecutive series of patients with early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer who underwent resection for lung cancer. The difference between tumour size at diagnostic and preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans was calculated. Significant tumour growth was defined as a diameter increase of ⩾5 mm or ⩾20%. The time intervals between baseline and repeat CT (CT-int) and between baseline CT and date of surgery (Surg-int), as well as other potential clinical and pathologic prognostic factors, were compared between upstaged and nonupstaged patients. Results: There were 121 patients identified. Fifty-four patients (44.6%) had tumour growth ⩾5 mm and 27 patients (22%) had tumour growth ⩾20%. Median CT-int and Surg-int were 2.4 and 2.6 months, respectively. Forty-four patients (36%) were upstaged at surgery due to new lymph node involvement (n = 19), pleural invasion (n = 12), satellite nodules (n = 4), or increase in tumour diameter (n = 9). There was a marginal, but statistically insignificant, difference in median CT intervals in patients who had tumour growth <20% vs ⩾20% at 2.4 vs 2.6 months ( p = 0.06). Conclusion: Current cancer pathway waiting times are not associated with significant tumour growth or pathologic upstaging in this cohort.

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (6) ◽  
pp. 1901-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Wilson ◽  
Brian E. Louie ◽  
Robert J. Cerfolio ◽  
Bernard J. Park ◽  
Eric Vallières ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 1110-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Brown ◽  
Brian E. Louie ◽  
Nicole Jackson ◽  
Alexander S. Farivar ◽  
Ralph W. Aye ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 865-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Saint-Jacques ◽  
Daniel Rayson ◽  
Turki Al-Fayea ◽  
Kiran Virik ◽  
Wojciech Morzycki ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 638-644
Author(s):  
Andrey Arsenev ◽  
Sergey Novikov ◽  
Sergey Kanaev ◽  
Anton Barchuk ◽  
Andrey Nefedov ◽  
...  

An active introduction of screening programs potentially leads to a significant increase in the proportion of patients with early forms of non-small cell lung cancer. Surgical treatment, which is the standard of care for localized forms, due to functional limitations can be performed only in 65-70% of patients. The solution to this problem can be found in the improvement of the results of radiotherapy by using modern equipment, the planning systems, improved fractionation schemes and introduction of methods for summing radiation doses. Stereotactic radiotherapy allows high-precision delivery of high radiation dose to tumor with a minimal damage to surrounding healthy tissues. In this literature review based on the analysis of a large number of publications we show that it is not yet possible to make valid conclusions about the effectiveness and safety of stereotactic radiation therapy as an alternative to the surgical methods. It is necessary to plan and conduct randomized trials without further delay taking into account the expected high relevance of the method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document