scholarly journals The geontological time-spaces of late modern war

2021 ◽  
pp. 030913252110642
Author(s):  
Mark Griffiths

Attending to connections between serious health conditions (cancers and congenital disorders) and weapons residues in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza, this article develops a geographical agenda for examining power in late modern war from the perspective of the ground and the life it sustains. A case is made for understanding the time-spaces of war as not compressed, vertical or remote but enduring, pedospheric and proximate in which violence emerges through processes (carcinogenic and teratogenic) that transcend boundaries between ‘life’ ( bios) and ‘nonlife’ ( geos). Such are the geontological time-spaces of late modern war that geographers – in both ‘physical’ and ‘human’ sub-fields – are uniquely equipped to examine.

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Jones
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jill McTavish ◽  
Roma Harris ◽  
Nadine Wathen

In this study we have examined the topography of webpages that users gain access to through Google keyword searches, for five major health conditions. Implications of our findings will be discussed in light of late modern information seeking practices, which serve not only to keep users informed, but to mediate their personal identities.Pour cette étude, nous avons examiné la topographie de pages Web auxquelles accèdent les utilisateurs qui ont recherché dans Google de l'information sur cinq troubles de la santé graves. Nous discuterons de l'implication des données recueillies dans l'optique des récentes pratiques modernes de recherche documentaire qui servent non seulement à informer les utilisateurs, mais également à témoigner de leur identité personnelle. 


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 188-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Gregory

The proponents of late modern war like to argue that it has become surgical, sensitive and scrupulous, and remotely operated Unmanned Aerial Vehicles or ‘drones’ have become diagnostic instruments in contemporary debates over the conjunction of virtual and ‘virtuous’ war. Advocates for the use of Predators and Reapers in counterinsurgency and counterterrorism campaigns have emphasized their crucial role in providing intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance, in strengthening the legal armature of targeting, and in conducting precision-strikes. Critics claim that their use reduces late modern war to a video game in which killing becomes casual. Most discussion has focused on the covert campaign waged by CIA-operated drones in Pakistan, but it is also vitally important to interrogate the role of United States Air Force-operated drones in Afghanistan. In doing so, it becomes possible to see that the problem there may not be remoteness and detachment but, rather, the sense of proximity to ground troops inculcated by the video feeds from the aerial platforms.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Peters ◽  
William S. Shaw ◽  
Elyssa Besen ◽  
Robert K. McLellan ◽  
Torill H. Tveito

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Reeder ◽  
Karen Chad ◽  
Liz Harrison ◽  
Nigel Ashworth ◽  
Suzanne Sheppard ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Bryan ◽  
Katherine Taber ◽  
Robin Hurley ◽  
Patrick Calhoun ◽  
Kristy Straits-Troster

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document