Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Are Clinical Outcomes Maintained 10 Years Later?

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199247
Author(s):  
Jae Han Park ◽  
Kwang Hwan Park ◽  
Jae Yong Cho ◽  
Seung Hwan Han ◽  
Jin Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Mean

Background: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) is considered the first-line treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). However, the long-term stability of the clinical success of BMS remains unclear. Purpose: To investigate the long-term clinical outcomes among patients who underwent BMS for OLT and to identify prognostic factors for the need for revision surgery. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 202 ankles (189 patients) that were treated with BMS for OLT and had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The visual analog scale for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Prognostic factors associated with revision surgery were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard regression models and log-rank tests. Results: The mean lesion size was 105.32 mm2 (range, 19.75-322.79); 42 ankles (20.8%) had large lesions (≥150 mm2). The mean visual analog scale for pain improved from 7.11 ± 1.73 (mean ± SD) preoperatively to 1.44 ± 1.52, 1.46 ± 1.57, and 1.99 ± 1.67 at 1, 3 to 6, and ≥10 years, respectively, after BMS ( P < .001). The mean ankle-hindfoot score also improved, from 58.22 ± 13.57 preoperatively to 86.88 ± 10.61, 86.17 ± 10.23, and 82.76 ± 11.65 at 1, 3 to 6, and ≥10 years after BMS ( P < .001). The FAOS at the final follow-up was 82.97 ± 13.95 for pain, 81.81 ± 14.64 for symptoms, 83.49 ± 11.04 for activities of daily living, 79.34 ± 11.61 for sports, and 78.71 ± 12.42 for quality of life. Twelve ankles underwent revision surgery after a mean 53.5 months. Significant prognostic factors associated with revision surgery were the size of the lesion (preoperative magnetic resonance imaging measurement ≥150 mm2; P = .014) and obesity (body mass index ≥25; P = .009). Conclusion: BMS for OLT yields satisfactory clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 13.9 years. The success of the surgery may depend on the lesion size and body mass index of the patient.

scholarly journals Satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes after bone marrow stimulation of osteochondral lesions of the talus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinten G. H. Rikken ◽  
Jari Dahmen ◽  
Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens ◽  
Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Degenerative Changes ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Ankle Osteoarthritis ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Marrow Stimulation ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) at long-term follow-up. Methods A literature search was conducted from the earliest record until March 2021 to identify studies published using the PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), and Cochrane Library databases. Clinical studies reporting on arthroscopic BMS for OLTs at a minimum of 8-year follow-up were included. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently conducted the article selection and conducted the quality assessment using the Methodological index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). The primary outcome was defined as clinical outcomes consisting of pain scores and patient-reported outcome measures. Secondary outcomes concerned the return to sport rate, reoperation rate, complication rate, and the rate of progression of degenerative changes within the tibiotalar joint as a measure of ankle osteoarthritis. Associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated based on the primary and secondary outcome measures. Results Six studies with a total of 323 ankles (310 patients) were included at a mean pooled follow-up of 13.0 (9.5–13.9) years. The mean MINORS score of the included studies was 7.7 out of 16 points (range 6–9), indicating a low to moderate quality. The mean postoperative pooled American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 83.8 (95% CI 83.6–84.1). 78% (95% CI 69.5–86.8) participated in sports (at any level) at final follow-up. Return to preinjury level of sports was not reported. Reoperations were performed in 6.9% (95% CI 4.1–9.7) of ankles and complications related to the BMS procedure were observed in 2% (95% CI 0.4–3.0) of ankles. Progression of degenerative changes was observed in 28% (95% CI 22.3–33.2) of ankles. Conclusion Long-term clinical outcomes following arthroscopic BMS can be considered satisfactory even though one in three patients show progression of degenerative changes from a radiological perspective. These findings indicate that OLTs treated with BMS may be at risk of progressing towards end-stage ankle osteoarthritis over time in light of the incremental cartilage damage cascade. The findings of this study can aid clinicians and patients with the shared decision-making process when considering the long-term outcomes of BMS. Level of evidence Level IV.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Shows Promising Clinical Outcomes Over 10 Years

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0006
Author(s):  
Jae Han Park ◽  
Jin Woo Lee ◽  
Kwang Hwan Park ◽  
Sang B. Kim ◽  
Yoo Jung Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Marrow Stimulation

Category: Arthroscopy; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered as the 1st-line treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) with its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, low complication rate and successful clinical results in numerous studies. However, there were few studies which had investigated long-term clinical outcomes about the arthroscopic BMS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic BMS for OLT and to identify prognostic factors that affect the outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 202 ankles (189 patients) who underwent arthroscopic BMS as a primary surgery for the OLT between January 2001 and December 2008 with more than 10 years of follow-up. Visual analog scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scales, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed as clinical outcomes and re-operation data were collected. The clinical scores were compared along the stream of time. Kaplan-Meier plot and log rank test showed survival outcomes of OLT in the long-term follow-up. Factors associated with revision surgery were evaluated with multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: The VAS scales were improved from 7.11 +- 1.73 (preoperatively) to 1.51 +- 1.61 (3 to 6 years after BMS), and 2.00 +- 1.67 (over 10 years after BMS) (P < 0.001). Also the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale were also improved from 58.39 +- 13.7373 (preoperatively) to 85.85 +- 10.31 (3 to 6 years after BMS), and 82.56 +- 11.62 (over 10 years after BMS) (P < 0.001). FAOS at final follow-up was compatible with those of other literatures with short- and mid-term follow-up. Re-operation rate was 5.94 % (12 / 202 ankles). According to multivariate regression analysis, significant factors associated with the revision surgery were large- size (greater than 150mm2) OLT (P = 0.009) and body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 (P = 0.014). Conclusion:: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation is an effective and reliable operative procedure for the primary treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with favorable long-term outcomes at a mean follow-up of 13.9 years. Therefore, we recommend this procedure for the 1st-line treatment of the OLT. Success of arthroscopic BMS depends on the size of the OLT and the body mass index of patients.

scholarly journals Mid-Term Outcomes of Bone Marrow Stimulation for Primary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0039
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
James Toale ◽  
Conor Mulvin ◽  
Jari Dahmen ◽  
Gino MMJ Kerkhoffs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
The Mean

Category: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Sports Introduction/Purpose: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) is the most common reparative surgical intervention in the treatment of small osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). BMS has shown favorable short term clinical outcomes but several recent studies have shown less satisfactory results in the mid- to long-term due to fibrocartilagenous repair tissue deterioration over time following BMS. However, conflicting results with good mid- to long-term outcomes following BMS have been reported. There is still a lack of evidence on the success rates of BMS at mid-term and longer-term follow-up. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical evidence of mid- to long-term outcomes following BMS for the treatment of OLT. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Methodological quality of evidence was decifered using the Modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS). Studies reporting outcomes of BMS for primary ostechndral lesions at a minimum 4-year follow-up were included. Clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, and reported data were evaluated. Results: Fifteen studies containing 853 patients (858 ankles) were included at a weighted-mean follow-up time of 71.9 (48-141) months. The mean age was 35.3 (24.7-41.9) and the mean lesion size was 110.5mm2 (87-140). Nine studies (60%) used the AOFAS ankle hindfoot score with a weighted-mean postoperative score of 89.9 (78.4-91.8). Six studies showed both pre and post-operative AOFAS scores and showed a weighted-mean improvement of 24.5 (16-38.5). Four studies utilised the VAS score. The weighted-mean postoperative VAS scores were 2.4 (1.8-2.6). Three studies (20%) measured post-opeartive MRI at mid-term using the MOCART score and showed 48% complete filling, 74% complete integration, 76% surface damage, and 78% inhomogeneous repair tissue. Complication rate was 3.2% and reoperation rate was 6% following BMS at mid-term. Conclusion: This systematic review found good clinical outcomes following BMS for primary OLT at mid-term follow-up based on the AOFAS score. The complication rates were relatively low and the data showed a reoperation rate of 6% at mid-term. However, the radiological and MRI outcomes did not show similarly positive results, which may lead to recurrence and reoperation at long-term. Data were variable and numerous aspects largely under-reported in the literature relevant to the systematic review. Further high quality studies, a validated outcome scoring system and further MRI reports are required to accurately assess the success of BMS at mid-term.

Lesion Size Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes After Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 1698-1705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Ramponi ◽  
Youichi Yasui ◽  
Christopher D. Murawski ◽  
Richard D. Ferkel ◽  
Christopher W. DiGiovanni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Lesion Area ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Mean Diameter ◽  
The Mean

Background: The critical lesion size treated with bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) has been 150 mm2 in area or 15 mm in diameter. However, recent investigations have failed to detect a significant correlation between the lesion size and clinical outcomes after BMS for OLTs. Purpose: To systematically review clinical studies reporting both the lesion size and clinical outcomes after BMS for OLTs. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed in March 2015 based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included studies were evaluated with regard to the level of evidence (LOE), quality of evidence (QOE), lesion size, and clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty-five studies with 1868 ankles were included; 88% were either LOE 3 or 4, and 96% did not have good QOE. The mean area was 103.8 ± 10.2 mm2 in 20 studies, and the mean diameter was 10.0 ± 3.2 mm in 5 studies. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from 62.4 ± 7.9 preoperatively to 83.9 ± 9.2 at a mean 54.1-month follow-up in 14 studies reporting both preoperative and postoperative scores with a mean follow-up of more than 2 years. A significant correlation was found in 3 studies, with a mean lesion area of 107.4 ± 10.4 mm2, while none was reported in 8 studies, with a mean lesion area of 85.3 ± 9.2 mm2. The lesion diameter significantly correlated with clinical outcomes in 2 studies (mean diameter, 10.2 ± 3.2 mm), whereas none was found in 2 studies (mean diameter, 8.8 ± 0.0 mm). However, the reported lesion size measurement method and evaluation method of clinical outcomes widely varied among the studies. Conclusion: An assessment of the currently available data does suggest that BMS may best be reserved for OLT sizes less than 107.4 mm2 in area and/or 10.2 mm in diameter. Future development in legitimate prognostic size guidelines based on high-quality evidence that correlate with outcomes will surely provide patients with the best potential for successful long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation in the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0009
Author(s):  
Kwang Hwan Park ◽  
JaeHan Park ◽  
Jai Bum Kwon ◽  
Seung Hwan Han ◽  
Jin Woo Lee
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Osteochondral Lesion ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Operation Rate ◽  
The Mean

Category: Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) has presented promising clinical outcomes in recent studies. However, there were few studies which had investigated long-term clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesion of the talus and to identify prognostic factors that affect the outcome. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2007, 159 patients (172 ankles) with OLT underwent arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation as a primary surgery. Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and re-operation rate. Factors associated with re-operation were evaluated using bivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier plot showed survival outcomes of OLT in long-term follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up time was 12.7 years (range 10.1-16.8) and the mean size of the lesion was 105.4 mm2 (range 19.8- 322.8). The mean VAS improved from 7.21 ± 1.71 to 1.76 ± 1.60. The mean preoperative AOFAS score was 57.98 ±14.43 and the mean postoperative AOFAS was 82.91 ± 11.58. FAOS at the time of final follow-up was comparable with those of previous literatures which showed outcomes of surgical treatments of OLT in short- and mid-term follow-up. Re-operation rate was 6.40% (11 patients with 12 revision surgery) including seven cases of re-arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation, and five cases of OAT. According to bivariate analysis, significant factor associated with re-operation was large sized OLT in preoperative MRI measurement. Conclusion: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesion of the talus has made satisfactory clinical outcomes through long-term follow-up over 10 years.

scholarly journals Bone marrow stimulation for talar osteochondral lesions at long-term follow-up shows a high sports participation though a decrease in clinical outcomes over time

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaj T. A. Lambers ◽  
Jari Dahmen ◽  
J. Nienke Altink ◽  
Mikel L. Reilingh ◽  
Christiaan J. A. van Bergen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Bone Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Purpose Although bone marrow stimulation (BMS) as a treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCLT) shows high rates of sport resumption at short-term follow-up, it is unclear whether the sports activity is still possible at longer follow-up. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to evaluate sports activity after arthroscopic BMS at long-term follow-up. Methods Sixty patients included in a previously published randomized-controlled trial were analyzed in the present study. All patients had undergone arthroscopic debridement and BMS for OCLT. Return to sports, level, and type were assessed in the first year post-operative and at final follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were assessed by standardized questionnaires with use of numeric rating scales for pain and satisfaction and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Results The mean follow-up was 6.4 years (SD ± 1.1 years). The mean level of activity measured with the AAS was 6.2 pre-injury and 3.4 post-injury. It increased to 5.2 at 1 year after surgery and was 5.8 at final follow-up. At final follow-up, 54 patients (90%) participated in 16 different sports. Thirty-three patients (53%) indicated they returned to play sport at their pre-injury level. Twenty patients (33%) were not able to obtain their pre-injury level of sport because of ankle problems and eight other patients (13%) because of other reasons. Mean NRS for pain during rest was 2.7 pre-operative, 1.1 at 1 year, and 1.0 at final follow-up. Mean NRS during activity changed from 7.9 to 3.7 to 4.4, respectively. The FAOS scores improved at 1 year follow-up, but all subscores significantly decreased at final follow-up. Conclusion At long-term follow-up (mean 6.4 years) after BMS for OCLT, 90% of patients still participate in sports activities, of whom 53% at pre-injury level. The AAS of the patients participating in sports remains similar pre-injury and post-operatively at final follow-up. A decrease over time in clinical outcomes was, however, seen when the follow-up scores at 1 year post-operatively were compared with the final follow-up. Level of evidence Level II.

Primary Versus Secondary Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for the Treatment of Large Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1389-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang Hwan Park ◽  
Yeokgu Hwang ◽  
Seung Hwan Han ◽  
Yoo Jung Park ◽  
Dong Woo Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Marrow Stimulation ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Surgery Rates

Background: Recent studies have reported promising clinical results after osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) for the treatment of large osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). However, no study has yet compared clinical outcomes between primary and secondary OAT for large OLT. Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes among patients with large OLT who receive primary OAT versus those who receive secondary OAT after failure of marrow stimulation and to identify factors associated with clinical failure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From 2005 to 2014, 46 patients with large OLT (≥150 mm2) underwent OAT: 18 underwent OAT as initial surgical management (primary OAT group), and 28 patients underwent secondary OAT after failure of previous arthroscopic marrow stimulation (secondary OAT group). In both groups, OAT procedures included arthroscopic inspection and debridement of concomitant soft tissue injuries. Clinical outcomes were assessed using pain visual analog scale (VAS), the Roles and Maudsley score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), and revisional surgery rates. Factors associated with clinical failures were evaluated using bivariate and logistic regression analyses. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Mean follow-up time was 6 years (range, 2-10.8 years). Mean lesion size was 194.9 mm2 (range, 151.7-296.3 mm2). There were no significant differences between groups in patient demographics and preoperative findings. Postoperative pain VAS, Roles and Maudsley score, FAOS, and revisional surgery rates were not significantly different at last follow-up. Prior marrow stimulation was not significantly associated with clinical failure on bivariate analysis. Lesion size greater than 225 mm2 on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was significantly associated with clinical failure. Survival probabilities from Kaplan-Meier plots were not significantly different between the primary and secondary OAT groups ( P = .947). Conclusion: Clinical outcomes of patients with large OLT treated with secondary OAT after failed marrow stimulation were found to be comparable with those who were treated with primary OAT. These results may be helpful to orthopaedic surgeons deciding appropriate surgical options for patients with large OLT.

Arthroscopic Versus Open Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial With 15-Year Follow-up With an Assessment of the Glenoid Being “On-Track” and “Off-Track” as a Predictor of Failure

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110182
Author(s):  
Craig R. Bottoni ◽  
John D. Johnson ◽  
Liang Zhou ◽  
Sarah G. Raybin ◽  
James S. Shaha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Shoulder Stabilization ◽  
Mri Studies ◽  
Open Stabilization ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated equivalent short-term results when comparing arthroscopic versus open anterior shoulder stabilization. However, none have evaluated the long-term clinical outcomes of patients after arthroscopic or open anterior shoulder stabilization, with inclusion of an assessment of preoperative glenoid tracking. Purpose: To compare long-term clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability randomized to open and arthroscopic stabilization groups. Additionally, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were used to assess whether the shoulders were “on-track” or “off-track” to ascertain a prediction of increased failure risk. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A consecutive series of 64 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were randomized to receive either arthroscopic or open stabilization by a single surgeon. Follow-up assessments were performed at minimum 15-year follow-up using established postoperative evaluations. Clinical failure was defined as any recurrent dislocation postoperatively or subjective instability. Preoperative MRI scans were obtained to calculate the glenoid track and designate shoulders as on-track or off-track. These results were then correlated with the patients’ clinical results at their latest follow-up. Results: Of 64 patients, 60 (28 arthroscopic and 32 open) were contacted or examined for follow-up (range, 15-17 years). The mean age at the time of surgery was 25 years (range, 19-42 years), while the mean age at the time of this assessment was 40 years (range, 34-57 years). The rates of arthroscopic and open long-term failure were 14.3% (4/28) and 12.5% (4/32), respectively. There were no differences in subjective shoulder outcome scores between the treatment groups. Of the 56 shoulders, with available MRI studies, 8 (14.3%) were determined to be off-track. Of these 8 shoulders, there were 2 surgical failures (25.0%; 1 treated arthroscopically, 1 treated open). In the on-track group, 6 of 48 had failed surgery (12.5%; 3 open, 3 arthroscopic [ P = .280]). Conclusion: Long-term clinical outcomes were comparable at 15 years postoperatively between the arthroscopic and open stabilization groups. The presence of an off-track lesion may be associated with a higher rate of recurrent instability in both cohorts at long-term follow-up; however, this study was underpowered to verify this situation.

No Difference in Outcomes Following Osteochondral Allograft with Fresh Precut Cores Compared to Hemi-Condylar Allografts

Cartilage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 194760352110219
Author(s):  
Danielle H. Markus ◽  
Anna M. Blaeser ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Brian J. Mannino ◽  
Kirk A. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Osteochondral Allograft ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Objective The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes at early to midterm follow-up between fresh precut cores versus hemi-condylar osteochondral allograft (OCAs) in the treatment of symptomatic osteochondral lesions. Design A retrospective review of patients who underwent an OCA was performed. Patient matching between those with OCA harvested from an allograft condyle/patella or a fresh precut allograft core was performed to generate 2 comparable groups. The cartilage at the graft site was assessed with use of a modified Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scoring system and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Results Overall, 52 total patients who underwent OCA with either fresh precut OCA cores ( n = 26) and hemi-condylar OCA ( n = 26) were pair matched at a mean follow-up of 34.0 months (range 12 months to 99 months). The mean ages were 31.5 ± 10.7 for fresh precut cores and 30.9 ± 9.8 for hemi-condylar ( P = 0.673). Males accounted for 36.4% of the overall cohort, and the mean lesion size for fresh precut OCA core was 19.6 mm2 compared to 21.2 mm2 for whole condyle ( P = 0.178). There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes including Visual Analogue Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and Tegner ( P > 0.5 for each), or in MOCART score (69.2 vs. 68.3, P = 0.93). Conclusions This study found that there was no difference in patient-reported clinical outcomes or MOCART scores following OCA implantation using fresh precut OCA cores or size matched condylar grafts at early to midterm follow-up.

scholarly journals Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis With Lateral Ligament Stabilization for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in Patients With Ankle Instability

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110074
Author(s):  
Jakob Ackermann ◽  
Fabio A. Casari ◽  
Christoph Germann ◽  
Lizzy Weigelt ◽  
Stephan H. Wirth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cartilage Repair ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Lateral Ligament ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Background: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) has been shown to result in favorable clinical outcomes in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Though, the influence of ankle instability on cartilage repair of the ankle has yet to be determined. Purpose/Hypothesis: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with and without concomitant lateral ligament stabilization (LLS) undergoing AMIC for the treatment of OLT. It was hypothesized that the outcomes would be comparable between these patient groups. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Twenty-six patients (13 with and 13 without concomitant ankle instability) who underwent AMIC with a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 1.5 years were enrolled in this study. Patients were matched 1:1 according to age, body mass index (BMI), lesion size, and follow-up. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and Tegner, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores were obtained at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A musculoskeletal radiologist scored all grafts according to the MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) 1 and MOCART 2.0 scores. Results: The patients’ mean age was 33.4 ± 12.7 years, with a mean BMI of 26.2 ± 3.7. Patients with concomitant LLS showed worse clinical outcome measured by the AOFAS (85.1 ± 14.4 vs 96.3 ± 5.8; P = .034) and Tegner (3.8 ± 1.1 vs 4.4 ± 2.3; P = .012) scores. Postoperative CAIT and AOFAS scores were significantly correlated in patients with concomitant LLS ( r = 0.766; P = .002). A CAIT score >24 (no functional ankle instability) resulted in AOFAS scores comparable with scores in patients with isolated AMIC (90.1 ± 11.6 vs 95.3 ± 6.6; P = .442). No difference was seen between groups regarding MOCART 1 and 2.0 scores ( P = .714 and P = .371, respectively). Conclusion: Concurrently performed AMIC and LLS in patients with OLT and ankle instability resulted in clinical outcomes comparable with isolated AMIC if postoperative ankle stability was achieved. However, residual ankle instability was associated with worse postoperative outcomes, highlighting the need for adequate stabilization of ankle instability in patients with OLT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document