Residents Performance on the Mental Status Examination

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin A. Ross ◽  
Pierre Leichner

Twenty-six residents watched a videotape of the mental status examination of a psychotic patient, then wrote their assessment of the patient's mental status. The residents’ reports were independently graded by the authors. The residents’ marks were compared to performance on departmental oral examinations. Results showed that global or qualitative assessment of mental status performance was reliable. Excellent inter-rater reliability was achieved when the assessment criteria for sub-items of the mental status were well defined.

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1837-1837
Author(s):  
D. Grodberg ◽  
P. Weinger ◽  
A. Kolevzon ◽  
L. Soorya ◽  
J. Buxbaum

BackgroundThe traditional mental status examination, used universally in psychiatry, does not provide flexibility to accommodate the developmental perspective necessary for the examination of patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The Grodberg Autism Mental Status Examination (GAMSE), developed at the Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment, prompts the observation and recording of social, communicative and behavioral functioning in patients with ASD. The GAMSE contains 8 items, which produce a total score ranging from 0 to 16.Objectives1. To determine the validity of the GAMSE in accurately predicting diagnostic classification based on a gold standard observational assessment.2. To establish inter-rater reliability.MethodsEighty consecutive patients receiving autism diagnostic evaluations at the Seaver Autism Center were administered the GAMSE and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) as part of standard intake procedures. The classification accuracy of the GAMSE was assessed using the ADOS as the gold standard. Inter-rater reliability on the GAMSE was also examined (n = 44).ResultsA receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine a cut-off score based on the 8 items of the GAMSE. The most effective cut-off score of greater than or equal to 5 predicted outcome on the ADOS with a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.81. Co-rating of 44 participants on the AMSE resulted in an average measures intra-class correlation of 0.85.ConclusionsPreliminary results indicate excellent classification accuracy and suggest that the GAMSE may act as a useful standardized autism assessment tool for clinical and research endeavors.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Spaulding ◽  
M. Richlin ◽  
J. D. Phelan

1992 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Sabaawi ◽  
Jose Gutierrez-Nunez ◽  
M. Richard Fragala

A patient whose clinical presentation met criteria for schizophreniform disorder was ultimately found to have neurosarcoidosis, and the psychiatric symptoms responded to steroid treatment. The ongoing search for organic etiology was prompted by the presence of cognitive decline, perseveration and rare bizarre automatisms. This is virtually the first reported association between schizophreniform disorder and sarcoidosis. We reviewed the literature on neurologic involvement and psychiatric manifestations in sarcoidosis as well as the concurrence between organicity and schizophrenic psychosis. The importance of attending to all elements of the mental status examination in a patient with complex atypical findings is underscored.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Black

The interview and mental status examination are integral to the comprehensive patient assessment and typically follow a standard approach that most medical students and residents learn. The psychiatrist should adjust his or her interview style and information-gathering approach to suit the patient and the situation. For example, inpatients are typically more symptomatic than outpatients, may be in the hospital on an involuntary basis, and may be too ill to participate in even the briefest interview. Note taking is an essential task but should not interfere with patient rapport. The interview should be organized in a systematic fashion that, although covering all essential elements, is relatively stereotyped so that it allows the psychiatrist to commit the format to memory that, once learned, can be varied. The psychiatrist should start by documenting the patient’s identifying characteristics (age, gender, marital status) and then proceed to the chief complaint, history of the present illness, past medical history, family and social history, use of drugs and alcohol, medications, and previous treatments. A formal mental status includes assessment of the patient’s appearance, attitude, and behavior; orientation and sensorium; mood and affect; psychomotor activity; thought process, speech, and thought content; memory and cognition (including attention and abstraction); and judgment and insight. With the data collected, the psychiatrist will construct an accurate history of the symptoms that will serve as the basis for developing a differential diagnosis, followed by the development of a comprehensive treatment plan. This review contains 1 figure, 3 tables, and 12 references. Key words: assessment, differential diagnosis, interviewing, mental status examination, treatment plan


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document