Changes in Technology Use in California's Special Education Programs

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rena B. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Technology Use ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Special Education Programs ◽  
Education Administrators ◽  
Technology In Instruction ◽  
Drill And Practice

Abstract This study investigated changes in technology use in california's special education programs between the late 1980s and mid-1990s. two groups representing districts that participated in an earlier study were surveyed: special education administrators ( n = 149) and special educators who routinely use technology in instruction ( n = 189). Results suggest that computers and other technologies are more available today and used more often by administrators, teachers, and students with disabilities. Students are more likely to have technology goals on their individualized education programs, interact with technology in general education settings, and use computers as tools rather than for drill-and-practice. Administrators and teachers remain enthusiastic about technology's benefits. However, although technologies used in school programs have become more sophisticated and more plentiful, barriers to full implementation still exist.

Court Decisions and IDEA 1997 Compliance Issues that Affect Special Education Programs in Rural Schools

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O. Tate
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Rural Schools ◽  
School Administrators ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Idea 1997 ◽  
Special Education Programs ◽  
Education Act

This article reviews court decisions and compliance issues of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997, that impact rural public school special education programs. IDEA funding, alternative placement options, and qualitative standard requirements. Select elements of the IDEA 1997 Amendments are of particular importance to rural schools. Those elements are funding compliance requirements, changes in the identification and evaluation of eligible students with disabilities, and the qualitative standards required for providing special education and related services. Rural schools do not receive special compliance exemptions under the IDEA. The article presents court decisions in which litigation has produced guidelines for school administrators regarding use of resources, accommodations, modifications, and qualitative standards in rural special education programs.

The Effect of School Funding on Opportunity Gaps for Students With Disabilities: Policy and Context in a Diverse Urban District

2020 ◽  
pp. 104420732097054
Author(s):  
Rebecca A Cruz ◽  
Joon-Ho Lee ◽  
Alexandra G. Aylward ◽  
Catherine Kramarczuk Voulgarides
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
School Finance ◽  
School Context ◽  
School Funding ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Urban District ◽  
Local Control Funding Formula ◽  
Special Education Programs ◽  
Opportunity Gaps

School finance reform has recently centered on providing schools with more equitable access to resources to reduce opportunity gaps for students. Although special education is often a prominent part of larger equity conversations, special education funding is commonly excluded from school funding reform initiatives. Given the costly nature of special education programs, it is imperative that scholars and policy makers understand the effects of funding changes on outcomes for these students. In this study, we examined the effect of California’s Local Control Funding Formula, in addition to school context and student compositional characteristics, to identify changes in special education students’ achievement rates. Using a combination of publicly available data sources and local district data, we assessed differences in academic outcomes (i.e., achievement scores) between elementary students with and without disabilities in both high- and low-poverty schools, given increases in spending for special education programs.

scholarly journals Bullying and Victimization among Students in Special Education and General Education Curricula

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad A Rose ◽  
Dorthy L Espelage ◽  
Steven R Aragon ◽  
John Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Middle School Students ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Special Education Services ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
School Students ◽  
Education Services ◽  
Univer Sity

International research established over a decade ago that students who are en-rolled in special education curricula are victimized and perpetrate more bullying than their general education peers. However, few empirical studies have exam-ined bullying rates among American schoolchildren who receive special education services. In the current study, a sample of middle school students (n = 1009) enrolled in general and special education programs completed the Univer-sity of Illinois bullying, fighting, and victimization scales. As hypothesized, students with disabilities reported higher rates of victimization and fighting be-haviours than students without disabilities. Conversely, students with disabilities and their general education peers reported similar rates of bully perpetration.

scholarly journals Exploring the Enactment of Functional Curriculum in Self-Contained Cross-Categorical Programs: A Case Study

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Bouck
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Secondary Special Education ◽  
Curriculum Enactment ◽  
Functional Curriculum ◽  
Special Education Programs ◽  
The Moment

Little research has been devoted to studying functional curriculum in secondary special education programs, self-contained cross-categorical programs, or curriculum enactment in special education, which warrants study of the culmination of these issues. This article presents a case study that attempts to answer, “What is the nature of the enactment of functional curriculum in rural self-contained cross-categorical programs?” The study occurred in two rural secondary self-contained cross-categorical programs with two teachers, four paraprofessionals, and 15 students. The findings suggest that the curriculum was enacted in the moment, was relative, and created tensions between special education and general education. The findings also suggest that the enactment had to be very encompassing and that it developed a community within each programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document