Exit Plans for Students with Disabilities Attending Separate Approved Special Education Programs in the Private Sector

2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-97
Author(s):  
Millicent H. Kellner ◽  
Barbara Strickarz
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Special Education Programs

Court Decisions and IDEA 1997 Compliance Issues that Affect Special Education Programs in Rural Schools

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O. Tate
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Rural Schools ◽  
School Administrators ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Idea 1997 ◽  
Special Education Programs ◽  
Education Act

This article reviews court decisions and compliance issues of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997, that impact rural public school special education programs. IDEA funding, alternative placement options, and qualitative standard requirements. Select elements of the IDEA 1997 Amendments are of particular importance to rural schools. Those elements are funding compliance requirements, changes in the identification and evaluation of eligible students with disabilities, and the qualitative standards required for providing special education and related services. Rural schools do not receive special compliance exemptions under the IDEA. The article presents court decisions in which litigation has produced guidelines for school administrators regarding use of resources, accommodations, modifications, and qualitative standards in rural special education programs.

The Effect of School Funding on Opportunity Gaps for Students With Disabilities: Policy and Context in a Diverse Urban District

2020 ◽  
pp. 104420732097054
Author(s):  
Rebecca A Cruz ◽  
Joon-Ho Lee ◽  
Alexandra G. Aylward ◽  
Catherine Kramarczuk Voulgarides
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
School Finance ◽  
School Context ◽  
School Funding ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Urban District ◽  
Local Control Funding Formula ◽  
Special Education Programs ◽  
Opportunity Gaps

School finance reform has recently centered on providing schools with more equitable access to resources to reduce opportunity gaps for students. Although special education is often a prominent part of larger equity conversations, special education funding is commonly excluded from school funding reform initiatives. Given the costly nature of special education programs, it is imperative that scholars and policy makers understand the effects of funding changes on outcomes for these students. In this study, we examined the effect of California’s Local Control Funding Formula, in addition to school context and student compositional characteristics, to identify changes in special education students’ achievement rates. Using a combination of publicly available data sources and local district data, we assessed differences in academic outcomes (i.e., achievement scores) between elementary students with and without disabilities in both high- and low-poverty schools, given increases in spending for special education programs.

Changes in Technology Use in California's Special Education Programs

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rena B. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Technology Use ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Special Education Programs ◽  
Education Administrators ◽  
Technology In Instruction ◽  
Drill And Practice

Abstract This study investigated changes in technology use in california's special education programs between the late 1980s and mid-1990s. two groups representing districts that participated in an earlier study were surveyed: special education administrators ( n = 149) and special educators who routinely use technology in instruction ( n = 189). Results suggest that computers and other technologies are more available today and used more often by administrators, teachers, and students with disabilities. Students are more likely to have technology goals on their individualized education programs, interact with technology in general education settings, and use computers as tools rather than for drill-and-practice. Administrators and teachers remain enthusiastic about technology's benefits. However, although technologies used in school programs have become more sophisticated and more plentiful, barriers to full implementation still exist.

A Bandwagon without Music: Preparing Rural Special Educators

1984 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence W. Marrs
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Rural America ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Special Education Programs

The bandwagon has finally reached rural America. This article discusses important considerations for those who would board this bandwagon carrying baggage which includes preconceived ideas about using traditional special education programs to prepare special educators for rural areas. Competencies and curriculum elements which should be included in preservice programs are discussed.

Learning and Physical Environment the Necessity for Research and Research Design

1970 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Cruickshank ◽  
Herbert C. Quay
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Physical Environment ◽  
Special Educators ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Management Techniques ◽  
Special Education Programs

The growing concern about planning and providing effective physical facilities for special education programs is presented. Particular emphasis is focused on the inadequacy of decisions made by special educators and architects regarding the nature of the physical environment in the absence of empirically obtained evidence. Supporting the need for such research, some of the difficulties encountered—the isolation of variables, management techniques, and design—are discussed.

Why Working Apart Doesn’t Work at All: Special Education and English Learner Teacher Collaborations

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Sara E. N. Kangas
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Public Schools ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
English Learner ◽  
Individualized Education Programs ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Individualized Education ◽  
Linguistic Development ◽  
Synergistic Relationships ◽  
Learning English

With many students learning English also identified with disabilities in public schools, collaborations across special education and English learner (EL) education are critical to promoting these students’ academic and linguistic development. Yet, many special education and EL teachers work independently of one another, focusing on their own specialized roles. In the process, students with disabilities who are learning English receive fragmented, inadequate special education and EL services. This article provides specific strategies—cocreating individualized education programs and instituting consultations—special education and EL teachers can implement to break out of their isolated roles and to build synergistic relationships that benefit the learning of students with disabilities who are learning English.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document