Automated Prone Positioning and Axial Rotation in Critically Ill, Nontrauma Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abubakr A. Bajwa ◽  
Lisa Arasi ◽  
Juan M. Canabal ◽  
David J. Kramer
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Prone Positioning

First reported case of Weissella confusa abundance in the lung microbiota of a critically ill trauma patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome - caution warranted in the use of the Weissella genus as a probiotic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Starter Cultures ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Virulence Determinants ◽  
Prosthetic Joint

Weissella strains are currently being used for biotechnological and probiotic purposes [1]. While, Weissella hellenica found in flounder intestine had probiotic effects [2], certain species from this genus are opportunistic pathogens in humans. Apart from being implicated in disease in farmed rainbow trout [3], Weissella has been found to cause the following disease in humans.1. endocarditis [4,5]2. bacteraemia [6]3. prosthetic joint infection [7]Whole genome sequences ‘find several virulence determinants such as collagen adhesins, aggregation sub- stances, mucus-binding proteins, and hemolysins in some species’, as well as antibiotic resistance-encoding genes [8]. Caution is warranted in selecting of Weissella strains as starter cultures or probiotics, if at all, since the other option, Lactobacillus, are rarely involved in human disease.Here, the analysis of the lung microbiota in critically ill trauma patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome [9] shows (Accid:ERR1992912) shows complete colonization of Weissella (Fig 1). While, the study mentions ‘significant enrichment of potential pathogens including Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Haemophilus and Treponema’, there is no reference to the Weissella genus. The percentages of Weissella strains are :confusa=81, soli=7 ,hellenica=5 ,diestrammenae=2. I believe this is the first reported case of Weissella causing ARDS in humans.

scholarly journals Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Time to Weaning Off the Invasive Mechanical Ventilator among Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2935
Author(s):  
Jose Bordon ◽  
Ozan Akca ◽  
Stephen Furmanek ◽  
Rodrigo Silva Cavallazzi ◽  
Sally Suliman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Critical Illness ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Overall Mortality

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is the main cause of the pandemic’s death toll. The assessment of ARDS and time on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) could enhance the characterization of outcomes and management of this condition. This is a city-wide retrospective study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from 5 March 2020 to 30 June 2020. Patients with critical illness were compared with those with non-critical illness. We examined the severity of ARDS and other factors associated with (i) weaning patients off IMV and (ii) mortality in a city-wide study in Louisville, KY. Of 522 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, 219 (41.9%) were critically ill. Among critically ill patients, the median age was 60 years; 53% were male, 55% were White and 32% were African American. Of all critically ill patients, 52% had ARDS, and 38% of these had severe ARDS. Of the 25% of patients who were weaned off IMV, those with severe ARDS were weaned within eleven days versus five days for those without severe ARDS, p = 0.023. The overall mortality for critically ill patients was 22% versus 1% for those not critically ill. Furthermore, the 14-day mortality was 31% for patients with severe ARDS and 12% for patients without severe ARDS, p = 0.019. Patients with severe ARDS versus non-severe ARDS needed twice as long to wean off IMV (eleven versus five days) and had double the 14-day mortality of patients without severe ARDS.

An Evidence-Based Protocol for Manual Prone Positioning of Patients With ARDS

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Patrick Ryan ◽  
Cynthia Fine ◽  
Christine DeForge
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Unplanned Extubations

Background Manual prone positioning has been shown to reduce mortality among patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, but it is associated with a high incidence of pressure injuries and unplanned extubations. This study investigated the feasibility of safely implementing a manual prone positioning protocol that uses a dedicated device. Review of Evidence A search of CINAHL and Medline identified multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that demonstrated both the reduction of mortality when prone positioning is used for more than 12 hours per day in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and the most common complications of this treatment. Implementation An existing safe patient-handling device was modified to enable staff to safely perform manual prone positioning with few complications for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. All staff received training on the protocol and use of the device before implementation. Evaluation This study included 36 consecutive patients who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit at a large academic medical center because of hypoxemic respiratory failure/acute respiratory distress syndrome and received mechanical ventilation and prone positioning. Data were collected on clinical presentation, interventions, and complications. Sustainability Using the robust protocol and the low-cost device, staff can safely perform a low-volume, high-risk maneuver. This method provides cost savings compared with other prone positioning methods. Conclusions Implementing a prone positioning protocol with a dedicated device is feasible, with fewer complications and lower costs than anticipated.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Critically Ill Children at Risk for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven L. Shein ◽  
Aline B. Maddux ◽  
Margaret J. Klein ◽  
Anoopindar Bhalla ◽  
George Briassoulis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Children At Risk

Prone Positioning has no Effect on Mortality in ARDS

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-265
Author(s):  
Alex Puxty ◽  
Chris Cairns ◽  
Malcolm Daniel
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Simplified Acute Physiology Score ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Subsequent Change ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Change In Practice

In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), prone positioning improves oxygenation but has no impact on mortality, except perhaps in those with Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II >50. Level of evidence: 1+ (SR based on small RCTs, conducted prior to ARDSNet – subsequent change in practice)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document