Primary Care Provider Perceptions of Pharmacist Services in an Urban, Safety Net Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 790-798
Author(s):  
Anusha McNamara ◽  
Lenny L. S. Chan ◽  
Shirley L. Wong

While pharmacists have provided services in a multidisciplinary, primary care setting for decades, few publications have yet to evaluate providers’ impressions of- these services. An anonymous 14-item survey distributed to nonresident primary care providers aimed to identify clinical pharmacist services that are most and least helpful to primary care providers, identify barriers to pharmacy services, and develop recommendations to improve pharmacy services in primary care. The most important pharmacist contribution identified by providers is medication management, whereas the least important contributions are case conference, panel management, quality improvement, and transition of care. The primary reasons for referrals to pharmacists included inadequately controlled chronic diseases, poor or questionable adherence, longer visits for more in-depth discussion, and complex regimen requiring frequent monitoring or titration. Providers favored pharmacists working in direct patient care versus indirect patient care activities. Although many providers perceived no barriers to pharmacist service access, pharmacists’ presence and visibility were 2 barriers identified. Most providers preferred comprehensive to disease-specific medication management.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Zaslavsky ◽  
Frances Chu ◽  
Brenna Renn

BACKGROUND Acceptance of digital health technologies among primary care providers and staff for various clinical conditions has not been explored. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this nationwide study was to determine differences between behavioral health consultants (BHCs), primary care providers (PCPs), and nurses in acceptance of mobile apps, wearables, live video, phone, email, instant chats, text messages, social media, and patient portals to support patient care across clinical conditions. METHODS We surveyed 51 BHCs, 52 PCPs, and 48 nurses embedded in primary care clinics across the United States. We asked respondents to mark technologies they consider appropriate to support patients in: acute and chronic disease, medication management, health-promoting behaviors, sleep, substance use, and common and serious mental health conditions. RESULTS Respondents were geographically dispersed across the nation, although most (82.9%) practiced in urban and suburban settings. Compared to other personnel, a higher proportion of BHCs endorsed live video. Similarly, a higher proportion of nurses endorsed all other technologies. PCPs had the lowest rates of endorsement across technologies. Within clinical contexts, the highest acceptance rates were 81% and 70% for BHCs and PCPs respectively in live video for common mental health conditions, and 75% for nurses in mobile apps for health-promoting behaviors. The lowest (9%) endorsement rate across providers was in social media for medication management. CONCLUSIONS The survey suggests subtle differences in the way clinicians envision using technologies to support patient care. Future work must attend to provider perceptions to ensure the sustainment of services across conditions and patient populations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylee A. Funk ◽  
Deborah L. Pestka ◽  
Mary T. Roth McClurg ◽  
Jennifer K. Carroll ◽  
Todd D. Sorensen

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne D. Bentham ◽  
Anna Ratzliff ◽  
David Harrison ◽  
Ya-Fen Chan ◽  
Steven Vannoy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Crimmins ◽  
Lydia Elliott ◽  
Darren T. Absher

Context: Heart failure (HF) is a complex, life-limiting disease that is prevalent and burdensome. All major cardiology societies and international clinical practice guidelines recommend the integration of palliative care (PC) interventions alongside usual HF management. Objectives: The purpose of this review of the literature was to evaluate the various barriers to the early initiation of PC for HF patients in the primary care setting. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted in order to assess and incorporate the diverse sources of literature available. An EBSCO search identified relevant articles in the following databases: Medline complete, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and SocINDEX. The search was limited to full text, peer reviewed, English only, and published between 2010 and 2019. Results: Barriers to the integration of PC for HF patients include poor communication between provider/patient and interdisciplinary providers, the misperception and miseducation of what PC is and how it can be incorporated into patient care, the unpredictable disease trajectory of HF, and the limited time allowed for patient care in the primary care setting. Conclusion: The results of this review highlight a lack of communication, time, and knowledge as barriers to delivering PC. Primary care providers caring for patients with HF need to establish an Annual Heart Failure Review to meticulously evaluate symptoms and allow the time for communication involving prognosis, utilize a PC referral screening tool such as the Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure, and thoroughly understand the benefits and appropriate integration of PC.


Body Image ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 161-170
Author(s):  
Larkin Lamarche ◽  
K. Alysse Bailey ◽  
Amen Awan ◽  
Cathy Risdon ◽  
Glenda Pauw ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeuen Kim ◽  
Alice Hm Chen ◽  
Ellen Keith ◽  
Hal F. Yee ◽  
Margot B. Kushel

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah L. Zullig ◽  
Shelley A. Jazowski ◽  
Clemontina A. Davenport ◽  
Clarissa J. Diamantidis ◽  
Megan M. Oakes ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (20 Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S14.2-S14
Author(s):  
Nina Yakovlevna Riggins ◽  
Henna Sawhney ◽  
Annika Ehrlich ◽  
Mira Parekh ◽  
Morris Levin

ObjectiveTo evaluate if inpatient infusion treatments for patients with chronic migraine (CM) and history of head trauma and endocrine abnormalities can lead to headache improvement.BackgroundMany patients with CM and history of head trauma have endocrine co-morbidities that can interfere with successful management of headache. In this study, we evaluated if inpatient infusion treatments improved headache outcomes for this patient population.Design/MethodsRetrospective chart review of patients admitted and treated with 4–5 days of intravenous (IV) Dihydroergotamine (DHE), Chlorpromazine, or Valproate for headache. All cases were presented at the Headache Center Case Conference before admission, and plans for addressing co-morbidities were discussed with appropriate specialists and primary care providers. Co-morbidities addressed included diabetes mellitus, pituitary and thyroid dysfunction and endometriosis. During admission, vital signs and appropriate lab work such as serum glucose, thyroid, liver and renal function were monitored. Lifestyle recommendations provided during admission and appropriate follow ups after discharge were arranged with Headache Clinic, primary care, and specialists, when applicable.Results53 patients with CM were included in the analysis. 12 (22.6%) of the 53 patients had both reported history of head trauma and endocrine comorbidity. Of these 12 patients, 8 (66.7%) had improvement in headache up to 6 weeks after admission. Of the 8 that improved, 6 (75%) received DHE and 2 (25%) received Chlorpromazine.ConclusionsInpatient infusion treatments for patients who have CM with history of head trauma and endocrine abnormalities can lead to headache improvement, potentially due to IV infusion therapy along with holistic approaches which include addressing co-morbidities and education on lifestyle modifications. Future studies are needed to evaluate if specific endocrine system dysfunction can predict outcomes from repetitive infusion therapy for persistent headache in patients with CM and a reported history of head trauma.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 4923-4931
Author(s):  
Niharika Dixit ◽  
Nancy Burke ◽  
Gladys Rodriguez ◽  
Urmimala Sarkar ◽  
Barbara Cicerelli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document