Tooth Elongation of Maxillary Second Premolars and Mandibular Third Molars and Associated Periodontal Disease in Horses: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 089875642110526
Author(s):  
Colleen M. Turner ◽  
Jeff Reiswig ◽  
Jane Marie Manfredi

Periodontal disease has been identified in horses and donkeys through the millennia at a prevalence of up to 75% and is a leading cause of tooth loss in horses. We hypothesize that there is a correlation between tooth elongations and periodontal disease. Dental records of all client owned horses examined by a single AVDC/equine board certified practitioner in 2016-2018 were analyzed. Inclusion criteria consisted of the examination finding of tooth elongation of one of the following teeth pairs 106/107, 206/207, 310/311, or 410-411. The included cases were then examined for the finding of periodontal disease in Stages 1-4 (PD 1-4). Bayesian correlation analysis revealed significant positive correlations of elongations and periodontal disease existed between PD1 and proximal tooth pairs 106-107 and 206-207, PD2 and PD4 with all four tooth pairs, and PD3 with 106-107. Clinically, early diagnosis and treatment of newly formed elongations, or prevention of their formation altogether through diligent dental prophylaxis could prove key in preservation of teeth through prevention of the associated development of periodontal disease in the horse.

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Rajkumar ◽  
Sinha Ramen ◽  
Roy Chowdhury ◽  
P. K. Chattopadhyay

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-194
Author(s):  
Meltem Özden Yüce ◽  
Gözde Işık ◽  
Birant Şimşek ◽  
Selman Arslan ◽  
Tayfun Günbay

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3253-3256
Author(s):  
M Arshman Khan ◽  
Talib Hussain ◽  
Bilal Z. Babar ◽  
Sikandar J. Bajwa ◽  
S. Ghani ◽  
...  

Aim: To analyse early recognition of the distal cervical caries of mandibular second molar caused by impacted mandibular third molar, to correlate oral health and caries status and to find out the average age groups and gender affected by impacted third molar Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 300 participants was conducted over a 15-month period at Rehmat Memorial Hospital, Abbottabad. 300 participants having impacted third molar having distal cervical caries in mandibular second molar were analyzed clinically and radiographically. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 Results: the demographic data of 300 patients with impacted mandibular third molars were analyzed. 64% were male and 36% female that have extractions due to impaction. Caries caused in more than half of participants by mesioangular impaction, which was 52%, 3% due to distoangular, 26% due to distal, and 18% due to horizontal impaction. In 63.25% of cases, teeth were lost due to caries, periodontitis caused 20.25% of tooth loss, pericoronitis 7.75%, orthodontics 3.75%, prosthodontics 1.2%, trauma 1%, and other factors were 2.5%. study reveals that 30.5 % of the extractions were done from 21 and 30 years and 23 %of extractions were performed. 40% of those who took part in the study did not brush their teeth. Socioeconomic status also has a great impact on tooth extractions. Conclusion: After conducting this study, it was concluded that there was a relationship between the prevalence of distal cervical caries in mandibular second molars and the placement of neighbouring impacted mandibular third molars. As a result, the extraction of mandibular third molars should be done to avoid cavities and premature tooth loss in the neighboring molar. Key words: Third molar impaction, distoangular, distal cervical caries, extraction, 2nd molar caries


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laxmi Kandel ◽  
Ravish Mishra ◽  
Deepak Yadav ◽  
Shashank Tripathi ◽  
Snigdha Shubham ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishi Singh ◽  
Amiya Agrawal ◽  
Arvind Yadav ◽  
Siddhartha Chandel ◽  
Ankita Singhal

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence of complications in a group of 171 patients in whom extractions of impacted mandibular third molar have been performed by two oral surgeons between the period April 2010 and March 2012. This retrospective study comprises evaluation of 270 impacted mandibular third molars which were classified into two groups A and B on the basis of procedure of osteotomy only and osteotomy and odontotomy both respectively. Total no of complications reported were 40 (14.81%). Maximum no of cases reported alveolar osteitis (AO) (11.11%) while other complications reported root tip fractures (2.22%), lingual nerve parasthesia and TMJ problems (each 0.74%) in descending frequency. Conclusion drawn is that the risk of complications in extractions of impacted mandibular third molars always exists, and extractions associated with both osteotomy and odontotomy are associated with higher risk of complications. How to cite this article Agrawal A, Yadav A, Chandel S, Singh N, Singhal A. Wisdom Tooth—Complications in Extraction. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(1):34-36.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 107-108
Author(s):  
Gerlinde Pilkington ◽  
Juliet Hounsome ◽  
Tara Renton ◽  
Rumona Dickson

Introduction:Impacted third molars (I3Ms) are blocked from fully erupting; many I3Ms are asymptomatic, however there could be pain and pathological changes. Historically, I3Ms were removed prophylactically. Current options in the United Kingdom include either retention with standard care (watchful waiting), or removal due to pathological changes. We conducted a systematic review of the prophylactic removal of asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molars (IM3Ms) compared with standard care.Methods:We searched five electronic databases from 1999 onwards. Inclusion criteria: randomized and non-randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews (SRs) comparing the prophylactic removal of IM3Ms with standard care or studies assessing the outcomes of either approach; outcomes included pathology associated with retention, postoperative complications, adverse effects of treatment and health-related quality of life. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and/or abstracts, applied inclusion criteria to potentially relevant publications, and quality assessed and data extracted the included studies. No meta-analysis or network meta-analyses were undertaken.Results:Following screening of 11,373 references, 13 studies (four cohort studies and nine SRs) were included. One cohort study investigated the prophylactic removal of asymptomatic IM3Ms in comparison with standard care and retention, two investigated the prophylactic removal of asymptomatic IM3Ms, and one studied the retention and standard care of asymptomatic IM3Ms. Two studies reporting surgical complications found no serious complications; however, one study reported intense pain and postoperative infection. Pathological changes due to retention of asymptomatic IM3Ms were reported by three studies. Nine SRs of the management of third molars were included in this review, however none focused solely on IM3Ms.Conclusions:Consistent with previous systematic reviews, we found no RCT data to support or refute the prophylactic removal of asymptomatic IM3Ms, despite extensive searching of the literature. The review however did identify evidence from two longitudinal studies demonstrating the outcomes when asymptomatic IM3Ms are left in situ.


2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1102-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajasekhar Gaddipati ◽  
Sudhir Ramisetty ◽  
Nandagopal Vura ◽  
Rajeev Reddy Kanduri ◽  
Vinay Kumar Gunda

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document