Industrial Liaison Officers

1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-178
Author(s):  
Robert D. Handscombe

Universities in the UK, in common with many other public sector organizations, are being required to identify and use performance indicators. This article looks at some of the issues involved in measuring the performance of the director of industrial liaison and his or her support staff.

2006 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 80-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Andrew Stevens ◽  
Lucy Stokes ◽  
Mary O'Mahony

The setting and use of targets in the public sector has generated a growing amount of interest in the UK. This has occurred at a time when more analysts and policymakers are grasping the nettle of measuring performance in and of the public sector. We outline a typology of performance indicators and a set of desiderata. We compare the outcome of a performance management system — star ratings for acute hospital trusts in England — with a productivity measure analogous to those used in the analysis of the private sector. We find that the two are almost entirely unrelated. Although this may be the case for entirely proper reasons, it does raise questions as to the appropriateness of such indicators of performance, particularly over the long term.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. B. Liu ◽  
Z. L. Cheng ◽  
J. Mingers ◽  
L. Qi ◽  
W. Meng

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 2412-2441
Author(s):  
Sergei V. ANUREEV

Subject. The article investigates the rationality of internal controls in accordance with COSO-INTOSAI recommendations in public sector organizations. Objectives. The aim is to classify the reasons for failures and the actual refusal to directly follow the COSO-INTOSAI recommendations in public sector organizations in Russia and the UK, as well as to determine the directions for the rational development of internal control in such organizations. Methods. The study employs the content analysis of domestic and foreign sources, the comparative analysis. Results. The study classifies the reasons for failures, i.e. excessive universalism and inanity of recommendations borrowed from professional participants of the financial market, hiring employees from financial markets, erroneous creation of additional units, procedures and documents, objective lack of authority, motivation and qualification of employees to implement the recommendations. The areas of rational development are determined on the basis of sector specifics, real powers of budget fund managers, professional duties of chief accountants as controllers, reasonable centralization and digitalization of public services. Conclusions. The findings may clarify the regulatory and departmental documents of the Ministry of Finance and managers of budget funds in internal control of public sector organizations, and improve the performance of such organizations, increase the efficiency of budget spending and off-budget operations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
EMIL MARKVART ◽  
◽  
DMITRY V. MASLOV ◽  
TATYANA B. LAVROVA ◽  
◽  
...  

The existing approaches to quality assessment, based on ranking and rating, perform a control function but do not give government bodies at various levels, local governments, and public sector organizations the necessary tools to improve their performance. The article is devoted to one of the modern models of quality management in the field of public administration – the European model for improving the activities of public sector organizations through the self-assessment – the Common Assessment Framework (CAF model) and the possibilities of its implementation in Russia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Mouhcine Tallaki ◽  
Enrico Bracci

There are various factors that can affect an organization’s ability to overcome a crisis and the uncertainties that arise thereafter. Little is known about the process of organizational resilience and the factors that can help or prevent it. In this paper, we analyzed how public sector organizations build resilience/traits of risks awareness, and in doing that, we derived some elements that could affect the process of resilience. In particular, drawing on the conceptual framework proposed by Mallak we analyzed an in-depth case study in a public sector organization (PSO) identifying some contextual dimensions implicated in the process of building resilience. In our analysis, we identified two main elements that affect resilience: Risk perception and the use of accounting. Results shown how risk perception is perceived as a trigger, while accounting is considered as an enforcer in the process of building resilience capacity. The results also show the way accounting is implicated in the management of austerity programs and supporting the creation of a resilient public sector organization. In our case, the risk has become an opportunity for change. In the face of these budget cuts, management began refocusing the company’s mission from infrastructure maintenance to providing services with a market-based logic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document