Efficacy of mizoribine-tacrolimus-based induction therapy for pediatric lupus nephritis

Lupus ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 813-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Tanaka ◽  
T Aizawa ◽  
S Watanabe ◽  
E Oki ◽  
K Tsuruga ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 104.1-104
Author(s):  
C. C. Mok ◽  
L. Y. Ho ◽  
C. H. To ◽  
K. Y. S. Ying

Background:Objectives:To report the 10-year outcome of a cohort of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) treated with combined glucocorticoids with either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus (TAC) as induction in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).Methods:150 patients with active lupus nephritis were randomized to receive either MMF (2-3g/day) (N=76) or TAC (0.1-0.06mg/kg/day) (N=74) in combination with high-dose prednisolone (0.6mg/kg/day for 6-8 weeks and tapered) as induction therapy between 2005 and 2012. Complete renal (CR) or good partial renal responders were switched to azathioprine (AZA) (2mg/kg/day) for maintenance. We hereby report the 10-year outcomes of the patients in terms of renal flares (proteinuric/nephritic), renal function decline (drop in eGFR by ≥30% from baseline), development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4/5 (eGFR<30ml/min) and mortality. Factors affecting renal prognosis were studied by Cox regression analysis. Renal parameters (urine P/Cr ratio [uPCr], eGFR) at different time points from 6 to 24 months were studied for their predictive value of a poor renal prognosis by ROC analysis.Results:150 patients (92% women) with active LN were studied (ISN/RPS class III±V 36%; IVG/S±V 46%; pure V 19%). The mean age was 35.5±12.8 years and SLE duration was 50.2±62 months. The mean histological activity and chronicity score was 8.2±3.4 and 2.6±1.6, respectively. At baseline, 59(39%) patients were hypertensive, 62(41%) had active urinary casts, 112(75%) had microscopic hematuria and 67% patients had eGFR<90ml/min. As reported previously, the rate of complete renal response (CR) was 59% in the MMF and 62% in the TAC group (p=0.71). Maintenance therapy with AZA was given to 79% patients. After a follow-up of 118.2±42 months, proteinuric and nephritic renal flares occurred in 34% and 37% of patients treated initially with MMF and 53% and 30% in those treated with TAC, respectively. There was a total of 77 renal flares in 43 (57%) patients treated with MMF (0.11/patient-year) and 92 renal flares in 46 (62%) of patients treated with TAC (0.12/patient-year; p=0.44). The cumulative risk of having a renal flare of patients treated with MMF/AZA was 28% at 3 years, 42% at 5 years and 58% at 10 years, whereas the corresponding figures for patients treated with TAC/AZA was 32% at 3 years, 53% in 5 years and 66% in 10 years (p=0.43). For those who achieved CR after induction therapy, the mean time to first renal flare was 70.4±47.1 months in the MMF group and 65.2 ±50 months in the TAC group (p=0.61). The cumulative incidence of a composite outcome of decline of eGFR by ≥30%, development of CKD stage 4/5 or death at 5 and 10 years was 24% and 33%, respectively, in patients treated with MMF, and 17% and 33%, respectively, in those treated with TAC (p=0.90). Factors significantly associated with this outcome were first time lupus nephritis (HR 0.26[0.11-0.59]; p=0.001), uPCR at 6 months (HR 1.33[1.02-1.76]; p=0.04) and eGFR at 6 months (HR 0.98[0.97-0.997]; p=0.02). Exploratory ROC analysis demonstrated that an eGFR cut-off of 80ml/min (AUC 0.70; sensitivity 0.64, specificity 0.66) and uPCR cut-off of 0.75 (AUC 0.73; sensitivity 0.69, specificity 0.74) at month 18 best predicted CKD stage 4/5 or decline of eGFR by ≥30%.Conclusion:Long-term data of our RCT showed that TAC remained non-inferior to MMF as induction therapy of LN in terms of renal flares, renal function decline and mortality. Relapsed renal disease, lower eGFR and more proteinuria post-induction therapy were associated with a poorer outcome. An uPCR ≤0.75 and eGFR of >80ml/min at 18 months best predicted a better outcome at 10 years, and should be considered as a target for induction/consolidation therapy.Acknowledgments:NILDisclosure of Interests:None declared


1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan F. Massengill ◽  
Claire Hedrick ◽  
Elia M. Ayoub ◽  
John W. Sleasman ◽  
Kuo Jang Kao

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mileka Gilbert ◽  
Beatrice Goilav ◽  
Joyce J. Hsu ◽  
Paul J. Nietert ◽  
Esra Meidan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Consensus treatment plans have been developed for induction therapy of newly diagnosed proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. However, patients who do not respond to initial therapy, or who develop renal flare after remission, warrant escalation of treatment. Our objective was to assess current practices of pediatric nephrologists and rheumatologists in North America in treatment of refractory proliferative LN and flare. Methods Members of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and the American Society for Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN) were surveyed in November 2015 to assess therapy choices (other than modifying steroid dosing) and level of agreement between rheumatologists and nephrologists for proliferative LN patients. Two cases were presented: (1) refractory disease after induction treatment with corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) and (2) nephritis flare after initial response to treatment. Survey respondents chose treatments for three follow up scenarios for each case that varied by severity of presentation. Treatment options included CYC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), and others, alone or in combination. Results Seventy-six respondents from ASPN and foty-one respondents from CARRA represented approximately 15 % of the eligible members from each organization. Treatment choices between nephrologists and rheumatologists were highly variable and received greater than 50 % agreement for an individual treatment choice in only the following 2 of 6 follow up scenarios: 59 % of nephrologists, but only 38 % of rheumatologists, chose increasing dose of MMF in the case of LN refractory to induction therapy with proteinuria, hematuria, and improved serum creatinine. In a follow up scenario showing severe renal flare after achieving remission with induction therapy, 58 % of rheumatologists chose CYC and RTX combination therapy, whereas the top choice for nephrologists (43 %) was CYC alone. Rheumatologists in comparison to nephrologists chose more therapy options that contained RTX in all follow up scenarios except one (p < 0.05). Conclusions Therapy choices for pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists in the treatment of refractory LN or LN flare were highly variable with rheumatologists more often choosing rituximab. Further investigation is necessary to delineate the reasons behind this finding. This study highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in developing consensus treatment plans for pediatric LN.


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. e57-e59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Sato ◽  
Takuma Ohnishi ◽  
Yoji Uejima ◽  
Mihoko Furuichi ◽  
Shuichiro Fujinaga ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Phelisa Sogayise ◽  
Udeme Ekrikpo ◽  
Ayanda Gcelu ◽  
Bianca Davidson ◽  
Nicola Wearne ◽  
...  

Background. Lupus nephritis (LN) can be complicated with requirement for kidney replacement therapy and death. Efficacy of induction therapies using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) has been reported from studies, but there is limited data in Africans comparing both treatments in patients with proliferative LN. Methods. This was a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN diagnosed and treated with either MMF or IVCYC in a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa, over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was attaining complete remission after completion of induction therapy. Results. Of the 84 patients included, mean age was 29.6 ± 10.4 years and there was a female preponderance (88.1%). At baseline, there were significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and presence of glomerular crescents between both groups ( p ≤ 0.05 ). After completion of induction therapy, there was no significant difference in remission status (76.0% versus 87.5%; p = 0.33 ) or relapse status (8.1% versus 10.3%; p = 0.22 ) for the IVCYC and MMF groups, respectively. Mortality rate for the IVCYC group was 5.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up compared to 1.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up for the MMF group ( p = 0.11 ), and there was no significant difference in infection-related adverse events between both groups. Estimated GFR at baseline was the only predictor of death (OR: 1.0 [0.9–1.0]; p = 0.001 ). Conclusion. This study shows similar outcomes following induction treatment with MMF or IVCYC in patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN in South Africa. However, a prospective and randomized study is needed to adequately assess these outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document