Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in South Africa

Background. Lupus nephritis (LN) can be complicated with requirement for kidney replacement therapy and death. Efficacy of induction therapies using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) has been reported from studies, but there is limited data in Africans comparing both treatments in patients with proliferative LN. Methods. This was a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN diagnosed and treated with either MMF or IVCYC in a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa, over a 5-year period. The primary outcome was attaining complete remission after completion of induction therapy. Results. Of the 84 patients included, mean age was 29.6 ± 10.4 years and there was a female preponderance (88.1%). At baseline, there were significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and presence of glomerular crescents between both groups ( p ≤ 0.05 ). After completion of induction therapy, there was no significant difference in remission status (76.0% versus 87.5%; p = 0.33 ) or relapse status (8.1% versus 10.3%; p = 0.22 ) for the IVCYC and MMF groups, respectively. Mortality rate for the IVCYC group was 5.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up compared to 1.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up for the MMF group ( p = 0.11 ), and there was no significant difference in infection-related adverse events between both groups. Estimated GFR at baseline was the only predictor of death (OR: 1.0 [0.9–1.0]; p = 0.001 ). Conclusion. This study shows similar outcomes following induction treatment with MMF or IVCYC in patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN in South Africa. However, a prospective and randomized study is needed to adequately assess these outcomes.

Download Full-text

Differences in rituximab use between pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and renal flare in childhood-onset SLE

Pediatric Rheumatology ◽

10.1186/s12969-021-00627-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Mileka Gilbert ◽

Beatrice Goilav ◽

Joyce J. Hsu ◽

Paul J. Nietert ◽

Esra Meidan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lupus Nephritis ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Pediatric Nephrology ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Individual Treatment ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Childhood Onset ◽

Renal Flare ◽

Treatment Plans

Abstract Background Consensus treatment plans have been developed for induction therapy of newly diagnosed proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. However, patients who do not respond to initial therapy, or who develop renal flare after remission, warrant escalation of treatment. Our objective was to assess current practices of pediatric nephrologists and rheumatologists in North America in treatment of refractory proliferative LN and flare. Methods Members of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and the American Society for Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN) were surveyed in November 2015 to assess therapy choices (other than modifying steroid dosing) and level of agreement between rheumatologists and nephrologists for proliferative LN patients. Two cases were presented: (1) refractory disease after induction treatment with corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) and (2) nephritis flare after initial response to treatment. Survey respondents chose treatments for three follow up scenarios for each case that varied by severity of presentation. Treatment options included CYC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), and others, alone or in combination. Results Seventy-six respondents from ASPN and foty-one respondents from CARRA represented approximately 15 % of the eligible members from each organization. Treatment choices between nephrologists and rheumatologists were highly variable and received greater than 50 % agreement for an individual treatment choice in only the following 2 of 6 follow up scenarios: 59 % of nephrologists, but only 38 % of rheumatologists, chose increasing dose of MMF in the case of LN refractory to induction therapy with proteinuria, hematuria, and improved serum creatinine. In a follow up scenario showing severe renal flare after achieving remission with induction therapy, 58 % of rheumatologists chose CYC and RTX combination therapy, whereas the top choice for nephrologists (43 %) was CYC alone. Rheumatologists in comparison to nephrologists chose more therapy options that contained RTX in all follow up scenarios except one (p < 0.05). Conclusions Therapy choices for pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists in the treatment of refractory LN or LN flare were highly variable with rheumatologists more often choosing rituximab. Further investigation is necessary to delineate the reasons behind this finding. This study highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in developing consensus treatment plans for pediatric LN.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Mycophenolate Mofetil vs. Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Induction Therapy of Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand ◽

10.35755/jmedassocthai.2020.08.11180 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 103 (8) ◽

pp. 785-790

Keyword(s):

Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽

Lupus Nephritis ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Infectious Complications ◽

University Hospitals ◽

Intravenous Cyclophosphamide ◽

Proliferative Lupus Nephritis ◽

Study Results ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) concomitant with corticosteroids demonstrated better outcomes in therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis albeit adverse effects may occur. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a newer oral medication for treating lupus nephritis. Objective: To compare renal outcomes between IVCY and MMF in conjunction with corticosteroid for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis. Materials and Methods: The authors reviewed the medical records from four university hospitals of children who received prednisolone with either MMF or IVCY for induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis between 2005 and 2014 in the present retrospective cohort study. Results: Twenty-eight and 85 patients were included in the MMF and IVCY group, respectively. The respective mean age at MMF and IVCY initiation was 12.36±2.87 and 11.84±3.04 years. Renal remission was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.690). Non-nephrotic range proteinuria (adjusted OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.94, p=0.015), and high initial GFR (adjusted OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.56, p=0.026) were significantly associated with achieving renal remission. Both infectious (82.1%) and non-infectious complications (96.9%) were more common in the IVCY group. Neither death nor end-stage renal disease (ESRD) occurred during the induction therapy. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in renal remission whether children received MMF or IVCY for induction therapy of lupus nephritis; however, adverse events occurred less frequently in the MMF group. Keywords: Children, Lupus nephritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Mycophenolate, Cyclophosphamide, Induction

Download Full-text

R-CHOP Versus (vs) CHOP Followed by Maintenance Rituximab (MR) Vs Observation In Older Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients (pts): Long-Term Follow-up of Intergroup E4494/C9793

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.589.589 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 589-589 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Vicki A. Morrison ◽

Fangxin Hong ◽

Thomas M. Habermann ◽

Richard I. Fisher ◽

Bruce D. Cheson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Cox Regression ◽

International Prognostic Index ◽

Prognostic Index ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Time To Failure ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 589 Background: The initial results of this intergroup trial with median follow-up of 3.5 years (yrs) were previously reported (J Clin Oncol 24:3121, 2006). We present updated results with median follow-up of 9.4 yrs from induction therapy randomization, and 9.0 yrs from maintenance randomization. Methods: 632 patients (pts), age >60 yrs, with DLBCL were randomized to CHOP+rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV, administered Day -7, -3, and two days before cycles 3/5/7 (if given) (R-CHOP), versus CHOP, for two cycles beyond best response for 6–8 cycles total. Pts were stratified by the International Prognostic Index (IPI) (<3 vs >3). 415 pts responding to R-CHOP or CHOP were then randomized to maintenance rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly times 4, every 6 months for 2 yrs starting 4 weeks after the last chemotherapy (MR, n=207), or observation (OBS, n=208). Results are presented for the 546 (267 R-CHOP; 279 CHOP) pts for induction, and 352 (174 MR; 178 observation) evaluable, centrally reviewed, maintenance pts. Failure-free survival (FFS) was the primary endpoint. The stratified weighted Cox regression was used to remove the effect of MR in comparing induction treatment, and stratified log-rank test used to assess maintenance effect. Results: Baseline characteristics and response to induction were balanced. 9-yr FFS and OS) are 35% and 44% for R-CHOP, and 25% and 37% for CHOP. Compared with CHOP, R-CHOP significantly prolonged FFS (p=.008), but not OS (p=.11). Pts were categorized into low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) groups according to their IPI (<3 or 33) (LR, n=217; HR, n=327). A significant difference in the effect of induction therapy was observed for high-risk patients only for FFS (p=0.02, HR=0.61, 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.93) but not for OS. MR significantly prolonged FFS (log-rank p=0.018, HR=0.71, 95%CI, 0.54 to 0.94), but not OS (p=0.44, HR=0.89, 95%CI, 0.65 to 1.20). A significant interaction between maintenance and induction therapies was observed in that MR significantly prolonged FFS after CHOP (p=0.003, HR=0.56, 95%CI, 0.38 to 0.82), but not after R-CHOP (p=0.89, HR=0.97, 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.47). There was no OS difference with MR after CHOP (p=0.19, HR=0.76, 95% CI. 0.50 to 1.15) or R-CHOP (p=0.77, HR=1.07, 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.68). Median time to failure after maintenance randomization following CHOP+MR was 9.5 yrs vs 2.0 yrs for CHOP+OBS (p=0.003) and following R-CHOP+MR was 8.5 yrs vs 7.5 yrs for R-CHOP+OBS (p=NS). Proportionately more treatment failures occurred within 2 yrs after CHOP+OBS (73%) compared to CHOP+MR (47%), p=0.01. In contrast, the proportion of failures within 2 yrs was similar for R-CHOP+OBS (38%) and R-CHOP+MR (36%), p=NS. Conclusions: Initial R-CHOP therapy, as compared with CHOP, resulted in improved DFS and FFS for older DLBCL pts. MR after CHOP, but not after R-CHOP, significantly prolonged time to failure but did not prolong OS. However, FFS was 42% at 9 yrs among R-CHOP responders, with or without MR. Future treatment strategies should build upon these findings in this older patient population, often with significant co-morbidities. Disclosures: Morrison: merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; genentech: Speakers Bureau; pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Fisher:roche: Consultancy. Horning:Genentech: Employment.

Download Full-text

Lupus Nephritis: Induction Therapy

Lupus ◽

10.1191/0961203305lu2114oa ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 14 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 27-32 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

TM Chan

Keyword(s):

Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽

Lupus Nephritis ◽

Adverse Effects ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Chinese Patients ◽

Renal Outcome ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Renal Survival ◽

Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Effective induction therapy is of pivotal importance in minimizing renal parenchymal damage by the active immune-mediated inflammatory processes in severe proliferative lupus nephritis. Preservation of nephron mass is prerequisite to long-term renal survival. Data from US-based studies have shown improved efficacy with induction treatment comprising corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide, compared with corticosteroid treatment alone. Data from European studies have shown similar efficacy with a modified treatment regimen, in which smaller doses of cyclophosphamide were given at weekly or fortnightly intervals over a shortened treatment duration, and the treatment related adverse effects appeared less frequent with the reduced-dose regimen. We have also reported that sequential immunosuppression with prednisolone and oral cyclophosphamide as induction followed by azathioprine maintenance was associated with a high incidence of remission and relatively favourable long-term renal outcome in Chinese patients. However, cyclophosphamide treatment is associated with considerable adverse effects, which could be potentially fatal. Mycophenolate mofetil selectively inhibits lymphocyte proliferation, and thus targets an instrumental step in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. There is accumulating evidence that the combined use of mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroid presents an effective treatment for severe proliferative lupus nephritis in different ethnic groups, and is associated with much fewer adverse effects compared with cyclophosphamide-based regimens. Recent data from our group also demonstrate the long-term efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in preserving renal survival, when used continuously as both induction and maintenance therapy.

Download Full-text

Induction Therapy and Outcome of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in the Top End of Northern Australia – A single centre study retrospective study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-863150/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Chi Xu ◽

Kim Ling Goh ◽

Asanga Abeyaratne ◽

Kelum Priyadarshana

Keyword(s):

Lupus Nephritis ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Indigenous Australians ◽

Indigenous Australian ◽

Class V ◽

Efficacy Outcome ◽

Proliferative Lupus Nephritis ◽

Incident Rate

Abstract BackgroundLupus nephritis is a common manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Mycophenolate is recommended by guidelines for induction therapy in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis and nephrotic range proteinuria Class V lupus nephritis. Indigenous Australians suffer disproportionally from systemic lupus erythematosus compared to non-Indigenous Australians. MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven class III lupus nephritis, class IV lupus nephritis and class V lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria from 1st Jan 2010 to 31st Dec 2019 in our institution and examined for the patterns of prescribed induction therapy and clinical outcome. The primary efficacy outcome of interest was the incidence of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) at one-year post diagnosis as defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) guideline. Secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of renal adverse outcome in the follow-up period. Adverse effect outcome of interest was any hospitalisations secondary to infections in the follow-up period. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were summarised using frequencies and percentages and assessed by Fisher’s exact test. Time-to-event data was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Count data were assessed using the Poisson’s regression method and expressed as incident rate ratio.Results20 of the 23 patients included in the analysis were managed with mycophenolate induction upfront. Indigenous Australian patients (N=15), compared to non-Indigenous patients (N=5) received lower cumulative dose of mycophenolate mofetil over the 24 weeks (375g vs. 256g, p<0.05), had a non-significant lower incidence of complete remission at 12 months (60% vs. 40%, p=0.617), higher incidence of composite renal outcome (0/5 patients vs. 5/15 patients, p=0.20) and higher incidence of infection related hospitalisations, (incident rate ratio 3.66, 95% confidence interval 0.89-15.09, p=0.073). ConclusionMycophenolate as upfront induction in Indigenous Australian patients were associated with lower incidence of remission and higher incidence of adverse outcomes. These observations bring the safety and efficacy profile of mycophenolate in Indigenous Australians into question.

Download Full-text

Intracameral Bevacizumab Versus Sub-Tenon’s Mitomycin C as Adjuncts to Trabeculectomy: 3-Year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10102054 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (10) ◽

pp. 2054

Author(s):

Gerasimos Kopsinis ◽

Dimitrios Tsoukanas ◽

Dimitra Kopsini ◽

Theodoros Filippopoulos

Keyword(s):

Mitomycin C ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Primary Outcome Measure ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Filtration Surgery ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Exfoliative Glaucoma

Conjunctival wound healing determines success after filtration surgery and the quest for better antifibrotic agents remains active. This study compares intracameral bevacizumab to sub-Tenon’s mitomycin C (MMC) in trabeculectomy. Primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma patients were randomized to either bevacizumab (n = 50 eyes) or MMC (n = 50 eyes). The primary outcome measure was complete success, defined as Intraocular Pressure (IOP) > 5 mmHg and ≤ 21 mmHg with a minimum 20% reduction from baseline without medications. Average IOP and glaucoma medications decreased significantly in both groups at all follow-up points compared to baseline (p < 0.001), without significant difference between groups at 3 years (IOP: bevacizumab group from 29 ± 9.4 to 15 ± 3.4 mmHg, MMC group from 28.3 ± 8.7 to 15.4 ± 3.8 mmHg, p = 0.60; Medications: bevacizumab group from 3.5 ± 0.9 to 0.5 ± 1, MMC group from 3.6 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 1.1, p = 0.70). Complete success, although similar between groups at 3 years (66% vs. 64%), was significantly higher for bevacizumab at months 6 and 12 (96% vs. 82%, p = 0.03; 88% vs. 72%, p = 0.04, respectively) with fewer patients requiring medications at months 6, 9 and 12 (4% vs. 18%, p = 0.03; 6% vs. 20%, p = 0.04; 8% vs. 24%, p = 0.03, respectively). Complication rates were similar between groups. In conclusion, intracameral bevacizumab appears to provide similar long-term efficacy and safety results as sub-Tenon’s MMC after trabeculectomy.

Download Full-text

GCT-27. CLINICAL FEATURES AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF NONGERMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMORS IN 111 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS IN A SINGLE INSTITUTION: IMPACT OF IRRADIATION AND CHEMOTHERAPY CYCLES ON SURVIVAL

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.247 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽

pp. iii333-iii333

Author(s):

Lei Wen ◽

Juan Li ◽

Qingjun Hu ◽

Mingyao Lai ◽

Cheng Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Germ Cell ◽

Chinese Population ◽

Germ Cell Tumors ◽

Tumor Diameter ◽

Limited Data ◽

Single Institution ◽

Large Institution ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND Limited data is available in intracranial nongerminomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) in Chinese population. Here we aimed to retrospectively assess the clinical-pathological and prognostic factors of NGGCTs in a single large institution in China. METHODS From June 2003 to December 2018, 111 consecutive NGGCTs were treated in Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, China. RESULTS The median follow-up was 36.2 months (range, 1.2 to 131.2 months). Three-year EFS and OS for 111 NGGCTs patients were 78.5%±4.5% and 82.8%±4.0%, respectively. 98 patients received CSI plus boost yielded better survival than those who received reduced-volume radiotherapy or no radiotherapy (3y OS, 86.7% vs. 51.4%, p=0.007). Patients had at least four cycles of chemotherapy were strongly associated with improved 3-year OS, compared to those received less than 4 cycles (94.1% vs. 63.6%, p＜0.001). There was no significant difference in survival of patients stratified by age, surgery, hydrocephalus, as well as tumor diameter. Multivariate analysis identified chemotherapy cycles less than 4 was the only prognostic factor that conferring a worse OS (p=0.003). Patients both received CSI and at least 4 courses of chemotherapy were correlated with lower incidence of relapse (p=0.044). CONCLUSIONS Multimodal approach including CSI and enough courses of chemotherapy was effective and should be recommended for the treatment of newly diagnosed NGGCTs in Chinese population.

Download Full-text

Long-term follow-up of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial, comparing azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206897 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 75 (3) ◽

pp. 526-531 ◽

Cited By ~ 68

Author(s):

Farah Tamirou ◽

David D'Cruz ◽

Shirish Sangle ◽

Philippe Remy ◽

Carlos Vasconcelos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽

Lupus Nephritis ◽

Positive Predictive Value ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Early Response ◽

Renal Outcome ◽

Proliferative Lupus Nephritis ◽

Long Term Follow Up

ObjectiveTo report the 10-year follow-up of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial comparing azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as maintenance therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis, and to test different definitions of early response as predictors of long-term renal outcome.MethodsIn 2014, data on survival, kidney function, 24 h proteinuria, renal flares and other outcomes were collected for the 105 patients randomised between 2002 and 2006, except in 13 lost to follow-up.ResultsDeath (2 and 3 in the AZA and MMF groups, respectively) and end-stage renal disease (1 and 3, respectively) were rare events. Time to renal flare (22 and 19 flares in AZA and MMF groups, respectively) did not differ between AZA and MMF patients. Patients with good long-term renal outcome had a much more stringent early decrease of 24 h proteinuria compared with patients with poor outcome. The positive predictive value of a 24 h proteinuria <0.5 g/day at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months for a good long-term renal outcome was excellent (between 89% and 92%). Inclusion of renal function and urinalysis in the early response criteria did not impact the value of early proteinuria decrease as long-term prognostic marker.ConclusionsThe long-term follow-up data of the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial do not indicate that MMF is superior to AZA as maintenance therapy in a Caucasian population suffering from proliferative lupus nephritis. Moreover, we confirm the excellent positive predictive value of an early proteinuria decrease for long-term renal outcome.Trial registration numberNCT00204022.

Download Full-text

Lupus Nephritis: Role of Serum Complement Levels as Prognostic Marker

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports ◽

10.31579/2690-1919/124 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 01-05

Author(s):

Richmond Gomes

Keyword(s):

Lupus Nephritis ◽

Treatment Response ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Serum Complement ◽

Class Iii ◽

Proliferative Lupus Nephritis ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After ◽

Assess Treatment Response ◽

Serological Biomarkers

Background: Lupus Nephritis (LN) is one of the most common and serious manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients that causes significant morbidity and mortality. Certain biomarkers for LN are sometimes able to assess treatment response of lupus nephritis. Objective: To compare serum complement levels (C3 & C4) as markers of treatment response of LN and their relation to the LN class in renal biopsy. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Nephrology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2018 to August 2019. Twenty seven patients who were diagnosed with lupus nephritis after kidney biopsy were included in this study. Serum complement levels (C3 & C4), 24 hours urinary total protein (24-hr UTP) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-ds DNA) were measured in all patients at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after treatment. These biomarker values before and after treatment were compared between the treatment response and non response groups. Results: Serum C3 levels were significantly different in patients of proliferative lupus nephritis (Class III & Class IV) than non proliferative lupus nephritis (Class V) at baseline (0.47 ± 0.32 vs0.89 ± 0.43g/l, p = 0.009) and levels changed significantly 6 months after treatment (p <0.001) and likewise for Serum C4 levels (0.10 ± 0.06 vs0.24 ± 0.26g/l, p = 0.040). Serum C3 levels were also found to correlate significantly with SLEDAI and renal SLEDAI. No significant difference was observed for 24-hr UTP levels at baseline between remission and non-remission groups. Conclusion: Serum C3 & C4 levels may be utilized as serological biomarkers to predict and monitor the treatment response of lupus nephritis.

Download Full-text

Prospective randomized trial of standard versus highly crosslinked tibial polyethylene in primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

The Bone & Joint Journal ◽

10.1302/0301-620x.101b7.bjj-2018-1126.r2 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽

pp. 33-39 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

P. F. Lachiewicz ◽

J. A. O’Dell

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Randomized Study ◽

Posterior Stabilized ◽

Function Score ◽

Score Change ◽

Osteolytic Lesions ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Total Knee

Aims There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of alternative polyethylene bearings in modular, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare standard polyethylene (SP) and highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLP) tibial liners in posterior-stabilized TKA, with osteolysis as the primary outcome and clinical results and the rate of re-operation as the secondary outcomes. Patients and Methods This is a single-surgeon, prospective randomized study involving one design of modular posterior-stabilized TKA. An analysis of 122 TKAs with an SP compression moulded liner and 123 with an XLP liner was performed, with a mean follow-up of six years (2 to 11). Patients were evaluated clinically using the Knee Society score, Lower Extremity Activity Score (LEAS), and the presence of an effusion, and standard radiographs were assessed for radiolucent lines and osteolytic lesions. Results Osteolysis was present in four TKAs (3.3%) in the SP group, and no knees in the XLP group (p = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the Knee Society total score, change in total score, knee function score, change in function score, LEAS, and change in LEAS in the two groups. There was a significant difference in the presence of an effusion (10/122 with SP liners, 1/123 with XLP liners; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the rate of re-operation between the two groups (p = 0.36). There were no complications related to the XLP liner. Conclusion At this length of follow-up, there were no advantages and no complications related to the use of this XLP tibial liner. The presence of effusion and small osteolytic lesions was more frequent with SP than XLP liners, but of unknown clinical significance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):33–39

Download Full-text