Book Review: In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests and Institutions, Public Indecency in England 1857–1960, Criminalization: The Political Morality of the Criminal Law, Criminalisation and Criminal Responsibility in Australia and Criminal Laws

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 776-780
Author(s):  
David Dixon
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-318
Author(s):  
Nicola Lacey

Abstract In his latest monograph, The Realm of Criminal Law, Antony Duff gives us a further, magisterial statement of the vision of criminal law, its procedural framework, and its sanctioning system, which he has been developing over the past 35 years. This is Duff’s own book-length contribution to the tremendously fruitful collaborative Criminalization project. That project has already generated four edited volumes (Duff et al. in The boundaries of the criminal law, 2010; The structures of the criminal law, 2011; The constitution of the criminal law, 2013; Criminalization: the political morality of the criminal law, 2014) and two fine monographs by Farmer (Making the modern criminal law: criminalization and civil order, 2016) and Tadros (Wrongs and crimes, 2016; see also Tadros in The ends of harm: the moral foundations of criminal law, 2011). It will shape the field for decades to come; and it has decisively laid to rest a longstanding puzzle about why, within criminal law theory, the principles underlying criminalisation had received relatively little attention as compared with those underlying, most obviously, criminal responsibility (cf. Lacey in Frontiers of criminality, 1995).


Author(s):  
Henrique Carvalho

This concluding chapter applies the theoretical framework developed throughout the book to the contemporary framework of criminal law. It traces the ambivalence of criminal subjectivity through the modern development of criminal responsibility and liability in English criminal law, relying on the interaction between the work of criminal law scholars and the political sociology of citizenship proposed by T.H. Marshall. It concludes that the preventive turn in criminal law is primarily characterized by a condition of radical ambivalence, in which the responsibility and dangerousness of the subject of criminal law are found both overemphasized and in tension with each other. This condition, the chapter argues, is as much a consequence of contemporary socio-political insecurity as it is an expression of the inherently problematic character of liberal criminal law.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
. Maryano ◽  
. Yuhelson

<p>Feature of corporation as activities-oriented for profit can lead to potential violations law or corporate crime. The criminal action corporations can arised because the impact of corporate activities arising from business contracts, product quality problems, failure of information technology systems and negligence of the administrative requirements for business licensing compliance. In other words, the legal entity of crime was often referred as corporate crime as violations committed by businesses to profit more quickly and maintains the company's reputation. The study concluded, first, the political dimension of the criminal law on corporation has general nature, that political criminal law founded in Criminal Code Bill which are oriented to the development of law by placing the corporation as a criminal, and need a codification law of Corporation. Second, The political criminal law also has special nature, which is found in 16 laws examined, in the contexts of criminal responsibility concepts and application of pattern of criminalas well as models of criminal sanctions can be imposed on perpetrators of criminal acts of the corporation.</p><p>Keywords: Corporate crime of law politics, legal standing, subject crime of law. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </p>


Author(s):  
Raul' Dzhindzholiya ◽  
Ruslan Zhirov ◽  
Azamat Dzuev

This article is devoted to the study of the essence and content of institutions of exemption from criminal responsibility and punishment. It is concluded that exemption from criminal responsibility and punishment as two types of criminal protection serve to implement the principles of humanism and justice in criminal law; ensure that the convict is corrected without criminal coercion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document