scholarly journals The Legal Policy of Corporation Legal Standing as Rechtpersoon at Indonesian Criminal Justice System

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
. Maryano ◽  
. Yuhelson
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
General Nature ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Dimension ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
The Impact

<p>Feature of corporation as activities-oriented for profit can lead to potential violations law or corporate crime. The criminal action corporations can arised because the impact of corporate activities arising from business contracts, product quality problems, failure of information technology systems and negligence of the administrative requirements for business licensing compliance. In other words, the legal entity of crime was often referred as corporate crime as violations committed by businesses to profit more quickly and maintains the company's reputation. The study concluded, first, the political dimension of the criminal law on corporation has general nature, that political criminal law founded in Criminal Code Bill which are oriented to the development of law by placing the corporation as a criminal, and need a codification law of Corporation. Second, The political criminal law also has special nature, which is found in 16 laws examined, in the contexts of criminal responsibility concepts and application of pattern of criminalas well as models of criminal sanctions can be imposed on perpetrators of criminal acts of the corporation.</p><p>Keywords: Corporate crime of law politics, legal standing, subject crime of law. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </p>

scholarly journals SISTEM PIDANA DAN PEMIDANAAN DI DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Failin Alin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
The Many ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Integral Policy

Renewal of criminal law in the context of improving the punishment system is still continuing. Of the many things to be updated, one important thing in the penal system is also crucial provided in the reform of Indonesian criminal law is the structural punishment system. This is something that should be included in the concept of reform of criminal law. Barda Nawawi termed as an integral policy in the handling crime to mention the importance of structural punishment system, which also means integral policy in the punishment system. The problems that arise are how the criminal system and punishment in the current Penal Code and  the Criminal System and Penalties in the New Criminal Code Concept as Part of the Renewal of Indonesian Penal Law. While the research method The type of research conducted is legal juridical Normative research that is about what the concept of punishment system in the renewal of criminal law in Indonesia that is by collecting data normatively and what is in the Act related to criminal law. In this paper we discussed it can be simply described, so far in the criminal system in Indonesia the focus of criminal offense and criminal responsibility is on the direct individuals involved in the criminal process. Where  is often the involvement of other parties besides the individual concerned who can also be held accountable as the impact of the occurrence of a crime. A concrete example, if a child commits a criminal offense, his / her "criminal" is not only granted to the child, but to his / her parents even if the criminal sanction is for example a fine of fines. This is because using the logic that the child is still the responsibility of parents, so that parents are also responsible for the actions of his son.

Moral and Criminal Responsibility in Plato'sLaws

2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 456-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
LORRAINE SMITH PANGLE
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Practical Work ◽  
The Political ◽  
Retributive Punishment ◽  
Ordinary Citizens

In his most practical work, theLaws, Plato combines a frank statement of the radical Socratic thesis that virtue is knowledge and vice involuntary with a prudential acceptance of the political community's need for retributive punishment. This paper examines theLaws'statements of principle regarding responsibility and punishment and compares these with the actual criminal code proposed in Book 9. The result is to show how a radical philosophic insight can be adapted to make ordinary citizens more gentle, thoughtful, and humane without sapping their moral commitments. Lessons are drawn from theLawsfor the contemporary restorative justice movement.

scholarly journals AGGRAVATING AND MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES CHARACTERIZING SUBJECTIVE SIGNS OF CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 681-685
Author(s):  
V.I. Tikhonov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Subjective Side

The Institute of mitigating and aggravating circumstances is presented not only in the norms of the General part of the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. The application of these circumstances in the construction of individual elements of a crime allows the legislator to differentiate the orientation of the criminal law influence in relation to a specific crime element or in qualifying the fact of life reality. In law enforcement practice, proving the subjective side of a crime often causes significant problems. At the same time, motivation and achievement of a specific goal of committing a crime can have both a mitigating and an aggravating effect. The subjective side has a significant impact not only on the design of the offenses of the Special Part of the Criminal Law, but also on the process of sentencing through legal regulation of circumstances mitigating or aggravating criminal punishment. In this regard, both general and mandatory features of the subject of the crime also affect the procedure for establishing guilt and determining punishment in accordance with the norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Of scientific interest is the study of the influence of the process of legal regulation of mitigating and aggravating circumstances in terms of the impact on this process of subjective signs of criminal behavior.

scholarly journals CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN INDONESIA ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPARISON

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Responsibility System

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.

scholarly journals ‘The Very Foundations of Any System of Criminal Justice’: Criminal Responsibility in the Australian Model Criminal Code

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlie Loughnan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Reform Process ◽  
Conceptual Level ◽  
Top Down ◽  
The Core ◽  
Reform Project

The Model Criminal Code (MCC) was intended to be a Code for all Australian jurisdictions. It represents a high point of faith in the value and possibility of systematising, rationalising and modernising criminal law. The core of the MCC is Chapter 2, the ‘general principles of criminal responsibility’, which outlines the ‘physical’ and ‘fault’ elements of criminal offences, and defines concepts such as recklessness. This paper assesses the MCC as a criminal law reform project and explores questions of how the MCC came into being, and why it took shape in certain ways at a particular point in time. The paper tackles these questions from two different perspectives—‘external’ and ‘internal’ (looking at the MCC from the ‘outside’ and the ‘inside’). I make two main arguments. First, I argue that, driven by a ‘top down’ law reform process, the MCC came into being at a time when changes in crime and criminal justice were occurring, and that it may be understood as an attempt to achieve stability in a time of change. Second, I argue that the significance of the principles of criminal responsibility, which formed the central pivot of the MCC, lies on the conceptual level—in relation to the language through which the criminal law is thought about, organised and reformed.

CORPORATION CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY MODEL BASED ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH IN INDONESIA

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Pujiyono Pujiyono
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Corporate Crime ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Solution Model ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Track System ◽  
Responsibility Model

Based on delinquiry non-potes doctrine, perpetrator and criminal responsibility are done by human (natuurlijk persoonen). Modernity can not be avoided by the development of corporation function. A research is needed to be conducted to answer questions whether criminal law is effective to overcome corporate crime and which corporation criminal responsibility model that can keep the balance of the protection of society and corporation interests through restorative justice approach. This study focuses on finding a win-win solution model of corporation criminal responsibility policy to keep the balance of the protection of society and corporation interests. This study used normative juridical method based on the secondary data,. The result of this research shows that criminal law with its retributive approach and its action which focus on the perpetrator is ineffective to handle corporate crime, because it ignores the victim To overcome those problems, corporation criminal responsibility model based on restorative justice approach in the form of “dual track system selective” is introduced.  Keywords: Criminal Responsibility, Corporation and Restorative Justice

scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 766
Author(s):  
I Dewa Made Suartha
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Concept Analysis ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
The Subject

The acceptance of corporation as the subject of criminal act brings problem to criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility. There are 2 principle problems in this study : (1) How is the current criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility?. (2) How is criminal law policy upon the corporation criminal act responsibility in ius constituendum perspective? The research used normative law method with legislation, comparative and law concept analysis approaches. The result of the research : (1) Criminal code has not regulates corporation as the subject of criminal act that is accountable for criminal law, nevertheless it is partial but inconsistent, (2) Criminal Code Bill 1999-2000 has clearly and completely regulated corporation as subject of criminal act and is accountable for criminal law and accept unconditional criminal responsibility as well as substitute criminal responsibility, although with the exception to solve difficult problem in order to prove mistakes made by corporation. Diterimanya korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana, dapat menimbulkan permasalahan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua permasalahan pokok, yaitu (1) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana pada saat ini dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi?. (2) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi dalam perspektif ius constituendum ? Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan dan analisis konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian adalah : (1) KUHP tidak mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana sedangkan di beberapa perundang-undangan di luar KUHP telah mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana, namun masih bersifat parsial dan tidak konsisten, (2) Rancangan KUHP 2014-2015 telah mengatur secara lengkap dan tegas korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan menerima pertanggungjawaban pidana mutlak serta pertanggungjawaban pidana pengganti, meskipun dengan pengecualian untuk memecahkan persoalan kesulitan dalam membuktikan adanya unsur kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh korporasi.

Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan Regarding Criminal Infractions and the Law Enforcement Practice

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Aibar S. NURKHAN
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Comparison Analysis ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

Studying of issues regarding criminal infractions – whether intended or imprudent – plays quite a significant role. Fundamental changes taking part in world economy and politics, globalization processes, as well as internal dynamics of country development, undoubtedly, have impact on national legal framework, including criminal law. Therefore, the main goal of the present paper is the analysis of legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan regarding criminal infractions and the law enforcement practice. To reach this goal authors have used methods of comparison, analysis and data systematization. As a result it has been found that in Kazakhstan there are at average 4,3 registered criminal infractions per a convict. The term of criminal infraction has appeared in the Criminal Code in 2014 to cover offences of small gravity and administrative violations that cannot be referred to the sphere of state administration. Authors have revealed the punishment in the present day Kazakhstan is not a main form of criminal responsibility realization. In the majority of cases linked to criminal infractions the persons committed them are relieved from criminal responsibility at the stage of prejudicial inquiry.

scholarly journals TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF RUSSIA: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 85-92
Author(s):  
Vasily N. Nekrasov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Innovative Activity ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Technical Innovations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Impact

In this paper, the author tried to consider the impact of such innovation results as technology on domestic criminal law and to understand whether the legislator is ready for them. In the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the legislator does not once use a single general concept in relation to technical innovations, which allows to characterize its various elements. At the same time, the legislator traditionally uses such private terms as tools, means, equipment, system, etc. When considering this issue, the first thought that comes to mind is that technical innova-tions in the Criminal Code are regarded as instruments or means of committing a crime. In criminal law theory, there are many points of view on the question of distinguishing between "instrument" and "means" of crime. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not clearly understand the concepts under analysis. Technical innovations, such as equipment by domestic lawmakers, are regarded as instruments and means of committing a crime. The above concepts were traditionally used by the legislator to construct the norms of the Russian criminal law. At the same time, due to the active development of innovation activity, new technical innovations are appearing today, which, firstly, did not exist before, and secondly, they have a number of specific features. At the same time, definitions that were not previously used in the Russian criminal law, which allow judging about new possibilities of technology, which only stimulate the discus-sion about the legal status of technology, both in criminal law and in legislation as a whole, are already in place today. Social relations are undergoing certain changes as a result of innovative activities. In this regard, the object of crime is also being transformed. As a result, a new type of property is emerging, namely intellectual property, which is also subject to criminal law protection. It seems that today there is a need to combine the norms in the field of crimes that infringe on innovative activity into a separate group of norms. These social relations have a number of features that make it possible to consider forming them into a separate type of crime object. Separating groups of crimes in the area of innovative activity will be of great importance. In particular, it will make it possible to establish public danger in relation to a group of crimes and to analyse changes in the degree of public danger of crime depending on the type of quali-fying and attracting circumstances.

scholarly journals The evolution of the criminal law protection of electoral rights in China

2021 ◽  
pp. 155-158
Author(s):  
Heng Zhou ◽  
Guanglong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Political System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Political Regime ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Regimes ◽  
Soviet Russia ◽  
Second Period

In comparison with other crimes, the political system has had and still has a great infl uence on the essence and legal registration of crimes against electoral rights. After the 20s of the XX century, the protection of electoral rights by criminal law in China can be divided into two periods: 1) in the conditions of the same political regime-until the end of the 80s and 2) in the conditions of different political regimes-from the end of the 80s to the present. In the fi rst period, the institution of protection of electoral rights by the criminal law of China was borrowed from Soviet Russia. In the second period after the adoption of the Criminal Code (1997), Article 256 has not yet undergone any changes. Currently, there is no incentive in China to change and improve the electoral and criminal laws.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document