Evaluating Predictors of Program Attrition Among Women Mandated Into Batterer Intervention Treatment

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick P. Buttell ◽  
Dolores Powers ◽  
Asia Wong
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Mohr Carney ◽  
Frederick P. Buttell ◽  
John Muldoon

Author(s):  
Taylor L. Claxton ◽  
Tara N. Richards

Recent research has emphasized the applicability of the Principles of Effective Intervention for batterer intervention treatment programs (BIPs), including using differentiated treatment models for first-time offenders compared to repeat offenders. The current study seeks to examine treatment matching across clients in two such differentiated BIPs from a mid-Atlantic state—one short-term program aimed at first-time IPV offenders ( n = 121) and one program implementing BIP “as usual” ( n = 125)—regarding client characteristics and recidivism. Findings indicate that clients in the short-term program were not significantly different than those referred to BIP “as usual” regarding common risk factors such as substance use, education, or employment, and while clients in the short-term program had fewer criminal history offenses, participants were rarely first-time criminal offenders. Further analyses showed no impact of the short-term program completion on client recidivism, while completion of BIP as usual was related to lower rates of reoffending among the program’s clients. Findings suggest the importance of how clients are matched to their level of treatment and more education and monitoring of referral agencies regarding differentiated BIP models. Further research is needed to assess whether short-term BIP programs are associated with recidivism reduction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-311
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Priester ◽  
Shanti Kulkarni ◽  
Annelise Mennicke ◽  
Bethany A. Bell

Batterer intervention programs' (BIPs) curriculum have been criticized for their one-size-fits-all approach to rehabilitation with recent research suggesting specialized and client-centric approaches to batterer intervention may be more effective than traditional programming. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been examined as a risk factor for intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration and numerous studies suggest a relationship between ACEs and low mental health treatment engagement. However, absent from the conversation is how ACEs may influence BIP treatment engagement and more specifically how ACEs influence BIP program attendance and attrition. The current study used administrative data from a sample of 268 men enrolled in a county-operated BIP to explore this question. BIP participants who experienced any ACEs, only household dysfunction ACEs, and/or both household dysfunction ACEs and child abuse/neglect ACEs had decreased odds of BIP attrition compared to participants with no ACEs. These findings have practical implications regarding screening, service delivery, and BIP curricula and highlight additional research needed on this topic.


Author(s):  
Shelly Jackson ◽  
Lynette Feder ◽  
David R. Forde ◽  
Robert C. Davis ◽  
Christopher D. Maxwell ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 371-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micaela Mitolo ◽  
Caterina Tonon ◽  
Chiara La Morgia ◽  
Claudia Testa ◽  
Valerio Carelli ◽  
...  

Background: Bright light treatment is a therapeutic intervention mainly used to treat sleep and circadian disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Recently, a handful of studies also focused on the effect on cognition and behavior. Conflicting findings are reported in the literature, and no definite conclusions have been drawn about its specific therapeutic effect. Summary: The aim of this review is to provide a critical evaluation of available evidence in this field, highlighting the specific characteristics of effective bright light treatment. Eligible studies were required to assess at least one of the following outcome measures: sleep, cognition, mood, and/or behavior (e.g., depression, agitation). A total of 32 articles were included in this systematic review and identified as research intervention studies about light treatment in AD. The quality of the papers was evaluated based on the US Preventive Service Task Force guidelines. Key Messages: Overall, the current literature suggests that the effects of light treatment in AD patients are mixed and may be influenced by several factors, but with a general trend toward a positive effect. Bright light seems to be a promising intervention treatment without significant adverse effects; therefore, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed taking into account the highlighted recommendations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document