scholarly journals Palliative Care During COVID-19: Data and Visits From Loved Ones

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 988-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Heath ◽  
Sharon Yates ◽  
Matthew Carey ◽  
Mary Miller

Objectives: A vital component of the coronavirus response is care of the dying COVID-19 patient. We document the demographics, symptoms experienced, medications required, effectiveness observed, and challenges to high-quality holistic palliative care in 31 patients. This will aid colleagues in primary and secondary care settings anticipate common symptoms and formulate management plans. Methods: A retrospective survey was conducted of patients referred to the hospital palliative care service in a tertiary hospital, south east of England between March 21 and April 26, 2020. Patients included had a confirmed laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-Cov-2 or radiological evidence of COVID-19. Results: The thirty-one patients included were predominantly male (77%), elderly (median [interquartile range]: 84 [76-89]), and had multiple (4 [3-5]) comorbidities. Referral was made in the last 2 [1-3] days of life. Common symptoms were breathlessness (84%) and delirium (77%). Fifty-eight percent of patients received at least 1 “as required” dose of an opioid or midazolam in the 24 hours before death. Sixty percent of patients needed a continuous subcutaneous infusion and the median morphine dose was 10 mg S/C per 24 hours and midazolam 10 mg S/C per 24 hours. Nineteen percent of our cohort had a loved one or relative present when dying. Conclusion: We provide additional data to the internationally reported pool examining death arising from infection with SARS-CoV-19. The majority of patients had symptoms controlled with low doses of morphine and midazolam, and death was rapid. The impact of low visitation during dying needs exploring.

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Fernandes ◽  
Tago Pugliese Branco ◽  
Maria Clara Navarro Fernandez ◽  
Carolina Paparelli ◽  
Mariana Sarkis Braz ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Kate Senior ◽  
David Perkins

This paper identifies the challenges in researching the impact of a rural palliative care service on its patients, carers and providers in the context of the National Palliative Care Strategy. It describes the use of an anthropological method to overcome problems of acceptability and respondent burden and to enable the elaboration of meaning and valuation by participants. It uses the Griffith Area Palliative Care Service as a case study to illustrate the problems of such research and the value of the anthropological method over more conventional research and evaluation approaches. It makes recommendations about how to assess the outcomes of services such as palliative care where the focus of care is complex, individual and family, and the outcomes go far beyond what can be measured with the medical model.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8034-8034
Author(s):  
A. F. Elsayem ◽  
R. Jenkins ◽  
L. Parmley ◽  
M. L. Smith ◽  
J. L. Palmer ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8034-8034
Author(s):  
A. F. Elsayem ◽  
R. Jenkins ◽  
L. Parmley ◽  
M. L. Smith ◽  
J. L. Palmer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Elverson ◽  
Helen Aspey ◽  
Owen Lever ◽  
Ellie Bond ◽  
Christine Mackerness ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Heneka ◽  
Tim Shaw ◽  
Debra Rowett ◽  
Samuel Lapkin ◽  
Jane L Phillips

Opioids are a high-risk medicine frequently used to manage palliative patients’ cancer-related pain and other symptoms. Despite the high volume of opioid use in inpatient palliative care services, and the potential for patient harm, few studies have focused on opioid errors in this population.ObjectivesTo (i) identify the number of opioid errors reported by inpatient palliative care services, (ii) identify reported opioid error characteristics and (iii) determine the impact of opioid errors on palliative patient outcomes.MethodsA 24-month retrospective review of opioid errors reported in three inpatient palliative care services in one Australian state.ResultsOf the 55 opioid errors identified, 84% reached the patient. Most errors involved morphine (35%) or hydromorphone (29%). Opioid administration errors accounted for 76% of reported opioid errors, largely due to omitted dose (33%) or wrong dose (24%) errors. Patients were more likely to receive a lower dose of opioid than ordered as a direct result of an opioid error (57%), with errors adversely impacting pain and/or symptom management in 42% of patients. Half (53%) of the affected patients required additional treatment and/or care as a direct consequence of the opioid error.ConclusionThis retrospective review has provided valuable insights into the patterns and impact of opioid errors in inpatient palliative care services. Iatrogenic harm related to opioid underdosing errors contributed to palliative patients’ unrelieved pain. Better understanding the factors that contribute to opioid errors and the role of safety culture in the palliative care service context warrants further investigation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 305-309
Author(s):  
Shirlyn Hui Shan Neo ◽  
Grace Su Yin Pang ◽  
Patricia Soek Hui Neo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document