scholarly journals Palliative Prognostic Index accuracy of survival prediction in an inpatient palliative care service at a Brazilian tertiary hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Fernandes ◽  
Tago Pugliese Branco ◽  
Maria Clara Navarro Fernandez ◽  
Carolina Paparelli ◽  
Mariana Sarkis Braz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Survival Prediction ◽  
Palliative Prognostic Index

Palliative Prognostic Index application at an inpatient palliative care service from a Brazilian tertiary Hospital: A prospective observational study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11537-11537
Author(s):  
Tiago Pugliese Branco ◽  
Alze Pereira dos Santos Tavares ◽  
Mariana Sarkis Braz ◽  
Mariana Ribeiro Monteiro ◽  
Ana Beatriz Kinupe Abrahao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Survival Prediction ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

11537 Background: Palliative Care Index (PPI) has been proposed to improve the accuracy of survival prediction for advanced cancer patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and real-world prognosis survival of oncology inpatients from a Brazilian tertiary hospital using PPI. Methods: Hospitalized advanced cancer patients who have been referred to the Palliative Care Team were enrolled from May 2011 to December 2018. The PPI was collected within 24 hours of the referral by the palliative care physician. Primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), estimated with the use of the Kaplan–Meier method, in three groups: PPI < 4.0; 4.0 ≤ PPI > 6.0 and PPI ≥ 6.0. Secondary endpoints were OS rate at 3-week for patients with PPI ≥ 6.0, and the most accurate PPI value to predict 6 and 3-week survival, calculated by ROC curve. Results: Total of 1.381 patients were included in this cohort with a median age of 68-year-old, and 51.3% of females. The most frequent primary cancer sites were lung/chest (17,2%), colorectal (14,3%), breast (11,2%), and biliopancreatic (10,9%). Among 454 patients with PPI < 4.0, median OS was 44 days (95% CI: 35,5-52,4); 20 days (95% CI: 15,4-24,5) for 260 patients with 4.0≤ PPI < 6.0 and 8 days (95% CI: 7-8,9) between 655 patients with PPI ≥ 6. Differences in OS among the groups adjusted for primary site, age and gender were significant (p < 0,001). OS rate at 3 weeks for PPI≥ 6.0 was 28.1% (OR 5,39 p < 0.001). PPI value of < 5,5 best predicted 6-week OS (79% sensibility, 55% specificity, AUC 0,714) and the PPI value of ≥ 5,5 predicted 3-week OS (67% sensibility, 73% specificity, AUC 0,753). Conclusions: PPI is feasible and suitable for routine clinical practice to predict survival among Brazilian patients with advanced cancer. In our study, PPI 5.5 seems to be the most accurate value to predict survival within 3 weeks.

Dyspnea—Can we do more? A view from a tertiary hospital palliative care service

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 305-309
Author(s):  
Shirlyn Hui Shan Neo ◽  
Grace Su Yin Pang ◽  
Patricia Soek Hui Neo
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Tertiary Hospital

scholarly journals Incorporating Routine Survival Prediction in a U.S. Hospital-Based Palliative Care Service

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 1439-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik K. Fromme ◽  
Mary Denise Smith ◽  
Paul B. Bascom ◽  
Tawni Kenworthy-Heinige ◽  
Karen S. Lyons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Survival Prediction

scholarly journals Palliative Care During COVID-19: Data and Visits From Loved Ones

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 988-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Heath ◽  
Sharon Yates ◽  
Matthew Carey ◽  
Mary Miller
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Loved One ◽  
Management Plans ◽  
Vital Component ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: A vital component of the coronavirus response is care of the dying COVID-19 patient. We document the demographics, symptoms experienced, medications required, effectiveness observed, and challenges to high-quality holistic palliative care in 31 patients. This will aid colleagues in primary and secondary care settings anticipate common symptoms and formulate management plans. Methods: A retrospective survey was conducted of patients referred to the hospital palliative care service in a tertiary hospital, south east of England between March 21 and April 26, 2020. Patients included had a confirmed laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-Cov-2 or radiological evidence of COVID-19. Results: The thirty-one patients included were predominantly male (77%), elderly (median [interquartile range]: 84 [76-89]), and had multiple (4 [3-5]) comorbidities. Referral was made in the last 2 [1-3] days of life. Common symptoms were breathlessness (84%) and delirium (77%). Fifty-eight percent of patients received at least 1 “as required” dose of an opioid or midazolam in the 24 hours before death. Sixty percent of patients needed a continuous subcutaneous infusion and the median morphine dose was 10 mg S/C per 24 hours and midazolam 10 mg S/C per 24 hours. Nineteen percent of our cohort had a loved one or relative present when dying. Conclusion: We provide additional data to the internationally reported pool examining death arising from infection with SARS-CoV-19. The majority of patients had symptoms controlled with low doses of morphine and midazolam, and death was rapid. The impact of low visitation during dying needs exploring.

scholarly journals 77 National Audit of Care At the End of Life (NACEL)—Round Two Findings

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
D Hibbert
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Experience Of Care ◽  
Outcomes Of Care ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care Service ◽  
The Right

Abstract   NACEL is a national comparative audit of the quality and outcomes of care experienced by the dying person and those important to them during the final admission in acute and community hospitals in England and Wales. Mental health inpatient providers participated in the first round but excluded from the second round. NACEL round two, undertaken during 2019/20, comprised: Data was collected between June and October 2019. 175 trusts in England and 8 Welsh organisations took part in at least one element of NACEL (97% of eligible organisations). Key findings include Recognising the possibility of imminent death: The possibility that the patient may die was documented in 88% of cases. The median time from recognition of dying to death was 41 hours (36 hours in the first round). Individual plan of care: 71% of patients, where it had been recognised that the patient was dying (Category 1 deaths), had an individualised end of life care plan. Of the patients who did not have an individualised plan of care, in 45% of these cases, the time from recognition of dying to death was more than 24 hours. Families’ and others’ experience of care: 80% of Quality Survey respondents rated the quality of care delivered to the patient as outstanding/excellent/good and 75% rated the care provided to families/others as outstanding/excellent/good. However, one-fifth of responses reported that the families’/others’ needs were not asked about. Individual plan of care: 80% of Quality Survey respondents believed that hospital was the “right” place to die; however, 20% reported there was a lack of peace and privacy. Workforce Most hospitals (99%) have access to a specialist palliative care service. 36% of hospitals have a face-to-face specialist palliative care service (doctor and/or nurse) available 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. NACEL round three will start in 2021.

scholarly journals The association between ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation and receipt of hospital-based palliative care for people with Covid-19: A dual centre service evaluation

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110229
Author(s):  
Sabrina Bajwah ◽  
Polly Edmonds ◽  
Emel Yorganci ◽  
Rosemary Chester ◽  
Kirsty Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Ethnic Minority ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Minority Groups ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Palliative Care Service ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
Socioeconomic Deprivation ◽  
Black British ◽  
Multivariable Regression

Background: People from ethnic minority groups and deprived socioeconomic backgrounds have worse outcomes from COVID-19. Aim: To examine associations between ethnicity and deprivation with timing of palliative care referral for inpatients with COVID-19. Design: Service evaluation of consecutive patients with COVID-19 referred to palliative care. Sociodemographic (including age, sex, Index of Multiple Deprivation, ethnicity coded as White/non-White) and clinical variables were described. The primary outcome was timing of referral to palliative care. Associations between ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation with the primary outcome were explored using multivariable regression. Setting/participants: Patients with COVID-19 referred to a hospital palliative care service across two London hospitals February–May 2020. Results: A total of 334 patients were included. 119 (36%) were from a non-White ethnic group; most commonly Black British (77, 23%) and Asian British (26, 8%). A longer time between admission and palliative care referral was associated with male gender (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14–1.34) and lower levels of socioeconomic deprivation (IRR 1.61, 95% CI 1.36–1.90) but not ethnicity (IRR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.87–1.06). Conclusions: This large service evaluation showed no evidence that patients from ethnic minority or more deprived socioeconomic groups had longer time to palliative care referral. Ongoing data monitoring is essential for equitable service delivery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document