The Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Health Care Utilization

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Kern ◽  
Alison Edwards ◽  
Rainu Kaushal ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 42-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Edwards ◽  
L.M. Kern ◽  
R. Kaushal ◽  

SummaryBackground: The federal government is investing approximately $20 billion in electronic health records (EHRs), in part to address escalating health care costs. However, empirical evidence that provider use of EHRs decreases health care costs is limited.Objective: To determine any association between EHRs and health care utilization.Methods: We conducted a cohort study (2008–2009) in the Hudson Valley, a multi-payer, multi-provider community in New York State. We included 328 primary care physicians in predominantly small practices (median practice size four primary care physicians), who were caring for 223,772 patients. Data from an independent practice association was used to determine adoption of EHRs. Claims data aggregated across five commercial health plans was used to characterize seven types of health care utilization: primary care visits, specialist visits, radiology tests, laboratory tests, emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and readmissions. We used negative binomial regression to determine associations between EHR adoption and each utilization outcome, adjusting for ten physician characteristics.Results: Approximately half (48%) of the physicians were using paper records and half (52%) were using EHRs. For every 100 patients seen by physicians using EHRs, there were 14 fewer specialist visits (adjusted p < 0.01) and 9 fewer radiology tests (adjusted p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in rates of primary care visits, laboratory tests, emergency department visits, hospitalizations or readmissions.Conclusions: Patients of primary care providers who used EHRs were less likely to have specialist visits and radiology tests than patients of primary care providers who did not use EHRs.Citation: Kaushal R, Edwards A, Kern LM, with the HITEC Investigators. Association between electronic health records and health care utilization. Appl Clin Inf 2015; 6: 42–55http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-10-RA-0089


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Kern ◽  
Alison M. Edwards ◽  
Michelle Pichardo ◽  
Rainu Kaushal

Abstract The longitudinal effects of electronic health records (EHRs) on ambulatory quality are not clear. It is not known whether adoption and meaningful use of EHRs result in a brief period of quality improvement that then plateaus, or whether with ongoing use quality improvement continues. We studied health care quality at six sites of a Federally Qualified Health Center in New York State over 3 years (2008–2010) for 25 290 unique patients. Patients were twice as likely to receive recommended care on a set of 12 quality measures (11 of which are included in Stage 1 Meaningful Use) 3 years post-EHR implementation, compared to 1-year post-implementation (odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.91–2.03). The magnitude of absolute improvement ranged from 5% to 20% per measure. EHRs were associated with continuing improvement in health care quality for at least 3 years post-implementation in the safety-net setting of a Federally Qualified Health Center.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Stablein ◽  
Joseph Lorenzo Hall ◽  
Chauna Pervis ◽  
Denise L. Anthony

Author(s):  
Claire M. Campbell ◽  
Daniel R. Murphy ◽  
George E. Taffet ◽  
Anita B. Major ◽  
Christine S. Ritchie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document