Impacts of Maryland’s Global Budgets on Medicare and Commercial Spending and Utilization

2020 ◽  
pp. 107755872095469
Author(s):  
Marisa Morrison ◽  
Susan Haber ◽  
Heather Beil ◽  
Katherine Giuriceo ◽  
Katherine Sapra

In 2014, Maryland incorporated global budgets into its long-running all-payer rate-setting model for hospitals in order to improve health, increase health care quality, and reduce spending. We used difference-in-differences models to estimate changes in Medicare and commercial insurance utilization and spending in Maryland relative to a hospital-based comparison group. We found slower growth in Medicare hospital spending in Maryland than in the comparison group 4.5 years after model implementation and for commercial plan members after 4 years. We identified reductions in Maryland Medicare admissions but no changes for commercial plan members, although their inpatient spending declined. Relative declines in emergency department and other hospital outpatient spending in Maryland drove slower Medicare hospital spending growth, saving $796 million. Our findings suggest global budgets reduce hospital spending and utilization but aligning incentives between hospital and nonhospital providers may be necessary to further reduce utilization and total spending.

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia M. Borkhoff ◽  
Mark L. Wieland ◽  
Elena Myasoedova ◽  
Zareen Ahmad ◽  
Vivian Welch ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 852-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol S. Navathe ◽  
Kevin G. Volpp ◽  
Amelia M. Bond ◽  
Kristin A. Linn ◽  
Kristen L. Caldarella ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Anne C. Kirchhoff ◽  
Sapna Kaul ◽  
Mark Fluchel ◽  
Christopher F Parmeter ◽  
Holly Lynn Spraker

21 Background: To evaluate perceived health care quality among a national sample of survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer relative to individuals from the general population. Methods: Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys from 2008-2012, we identified 1,163 survivors diagnosed with cancer ages 15-39 who were at least five years from diagnosis and currently ages of 20-64. A comparison group with no history of cancer was created via propensity score matching on sex, age at study, race/ethnicity, census-region, and survey year. Participants with one or more health care visit in the past 12 months were asked to rate health care quality from all providers (0 = worst to 10 = best), which we categorized as low (0-4), moderate (5-7) and high (8-10). Among survivors, we identified factors such insurance and health status associated with health care quality using ordinal logistic regression. Results: Mean time since diagnosis was 18.3 years. A total of 18% of survivors of AYA cancer reported no health care visits in the previous 12 months compared to 25% of the comparison group (p < 0.001). Survivors rated their health care quality lower than the comparison group (low/moderate: 30.8% vs. 22.5%, respectively, p = 0.003). Among survivors, those who were publicly insured (odds ratio (OR) = 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-0.97, p = 0.04) and uninsured (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.13-0.48, p < 0.001) were more likely to provide lower health care quality ratings than privately insured survivors. Survivors in fair/poor health also reported poorer quality compared to those in excellent/very good/good health (OR = 0.43, 95% CI, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Survivors of AYA cancer reported greater health care use and poorer health care quality compared to individuals without cancer. Our results call for targeted interventions to meet AYA cancer survivors’ health care needs and expectations.


2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1931-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis P. Scanlon ◽  
Shailender Swaminathan ◽  
Woolton Lee ◽  
Michael Chernew

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document