Effect of a maximal treadmill test on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure: The mediating role of fitness level

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Vera ◽  
Raimundo Jiménez ◽  
Beatríz Redondo ◽  
Amador García-Ramos ◽  
David Cárdenas

Objectives: We compared the impact of a maximal treadmill test on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure between trained and untrained individuals. Methods: Based on the maximal aerobic capacity (relative VO2 max), 31 military helicopter pilots were divided into groups of trained (n = 16; VO2 max = 57.06 ± 1.66) and untrained (n = 15; VO2 max = 43.42 ± 1.19) individuals. Intraocular pressure and blood pressure were collected before effort, just after volitional exhaustion and after 5 and 15 min of recovery. Results: The maximal treadmill test induced significant changes on intraocular pressure (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.52) and ocular perfusion pressure (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.60). Intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure increased just after volitional exhaustion (effect size = 0.88 and 1.59, respectively), and these values returned to baseline levels after 5 (effect size = 0.87 and 1.26, respectively) and 15 (effect size = 1.23 and 1.91, respectively) min of recovery. The untrained group exhibited higher intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure values in comparison with the trained group just after volitional exhaustion (effect size = 1.43 and 0.11 for intraocular pressure and effect size = 2.81 and 0.96 for ocular perfusion pressure). Five minutes of recovery was insufficient to reach baseline intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure values only for the untrained group (effect size = 0.91 and 0.72, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings reveal that fitness level modulates the intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure responses to a maximal treadmill test, being high fitness levels desirable in order to attenuate the impact of maximal efforts on these indices. These outcomes may be of clinical relevance for the management of glaucoma patients or those at risk, although future studies are needed to test these results in a clinical population.

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1351-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Cheng ◽  
Alexandre Todorov ◽  
René Tempelhoff ◽  
Tom McHugh ◽  
C. Michael Crowder ◽  
...  

Background Ocular perfusion pressure is commonly defined as mean arterial pressure minus intraocular pressure (IOP). Changes in mean arterial pressure or IOP can affect ocular perfusion pressure. IOP has not been studied in this context in the prone anesthetized patient. Methods After institutional human studies committee approval and informed consent, 20 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III) without eye disease who were scheduled for spine surgery in the prone position were enrolled. IOP was measured with a Tono-pen XL handheld tonometer at five time points: awake supine (baseline), anesthetized (supine 1), anesthetized prone (prone 1), anesthetized prone at conclusion of case (prone 2), and anesthetized supine before wake-up (supine 2). Anesthetic protocol was standardized. The head was positioned with a pinned head-holder. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance and paired t test. Results Supine 1 IOP (13 +/- 1 mmHg) decreased from baseline (19 +/- 1 mmHg) (P &lt; 0.05). Prone 1 IOP (27 +/- 2 mmHg) increased in comparison with baseline (P &lt; 0.05) and supine 1 (P &lt; 0.05). Prone 2 IOP (40 +/- 2 mmHg) was measured after 320 +/- 107 min in the prone position and was significantly increased in comparison with all previous measurements (P &lt; 0.05). Supine 2 IOP (31 +/- 2 mmHg) decreased in comparison with prone 2 IOP (P &lt; 0.05) but was relatively elevated in comparison with supine 1 and baseline (P &lt; 0.05). Hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters remained unchanged during the prone period. Conclusions Prone positioning increases IOP during anesthesia. Ocular perfusion pressure could therefore decrease, despite maintenance of normotension.


2018 ◽  
pp. 15-18

Background: Glaucoma is a frequent leading cause of blindness. Objective evidence showed that it can be secondary to optic nerve head hypoperfusion and autonomic dysfunction, not only to ocular hypertension. This makes the assessment of ocular blood flow a crucial step in the management of this disease. Aim: To investigate the circadian fluctuations of the intraocular pressure (IOP) and of the mean ocular perfusion pressure (mOPP) in patients with different types of glaucoma. Materials and methods: Sixty-five eyes of 65 glaucoma patients, managed in the Ophthalmology Department of the Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy (2012-2014). Among these eyes, 22 had normotensive glaucoma (NTG), 21 hypertensive glaucoma (HTG), and 22 exfoliative glaucoma (XTG). The IOP was measured by Goldmann tonometry and the blood pressure, both systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP), by Riva-Rocci sphygmomanometry, at three time points (8am, 2pm, 8pm). The mOPP was then calculated according to the formula mOPP = [2/3 (2/3 dBP + 1/3sBP) - IOP]. Results: The fluctuations of IOP and mOPP were statistically significant in all the studied eyes (p<0.001 for all the comparisons). Both IOP and mOPP showed significantly larger fluctuations in the XFG eyes than in the NTG and HTG ones (p<0.001 for IOP and p=0.001 for mOPP). Conclusions: In our study, the mOPP had larger circadian fluctuations in eyes with XFG than in those with NTG and HTG. This parameter deserves to be assessed in all types of glaucoma. Key words: Glaucoma, intraocular pressure, mean ocular perfusion pressure.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Ristin ◽  
Sarah Dougherty Wood ◽  
Michael Sullivan-Mee ◽  
Andrew Rixon ◽  
Brett Bence ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document