scholarly journals Efficacy of Smartphone-Based Secondary Preventive Strategies in Coronary Artery Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117954682092740
Author(s):  
Alexandra C Murphy ◽  
Georgina Meehan ◽  
Anoop N Koshy ◽  
Phelia Kunniardy ◽  
Omar Farouque ◽  
...  

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation programs provide a comprehensive framework for the institution of secondary preventive measures. Smartphone technology can provide a platform for the delivery of such programs and is a promising alternative to hospital-based services. However, there is limited evidence to date supporting this approach. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis examining smartphone-based secondary prevention programs to traditional cardiac rehabilitation in patients with established coronary artery disease to ascertain the feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with the outcomes of interest being 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and body mass index (BMI). Results: A total of 8 studies with 1120 patients across 5 countries were included in the quantitative analysis. Follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 12 months. Five studies examined all patients post acute coronary syndrome, 2 studies examined only patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and 1 study examined all patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease, independent of intervention. Exercise capacity, as measured by the 6MWT, was significantly greater in the smartphone group (20.10 meters, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.44-33.97; P < .001; I2 = 45.58). There was no significant difference in BMI reduction, systolic blood pressure, or LDL cholesterol levels between groups ( P value for all > .05). Conclusion: Publicly available smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation programs are a convenient and easily disseminated intervention which show merit in exercise promotion in patients with established coronary artery disease. Further research is required to establish the clinical significance of recent findings favoring their use.

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy Francis ◽  
Nader Kabboul ◽  
Valeria Rac ◽  
Nicholas Mitsakakis ◽  
Petros Pechlivanoglou ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 466-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayoshi Fukui ◽  
Yasukiyo Mori ◽  
Kazuya Takehana ◽  
Hiroya Masaki ◽  
Masayuki Motohiro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayuko Harada Yamada ◽  
Kazuya Fujihara ◽  
Satoru Kodama ◽  
Takaaki Sato ◽  
Taeko Osawa ◽  
...  

<b>Aims: </b>To determine associations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with new-onset coronary artery disease (CAD) or cerebrovascular disease (CVD) according to glucose status. <p><b>Research Design and Methods: </b>Examined was a nationwide claims database from 2008 – 2016<b> </b>on 593,196 individuals. Cox proportional hazards model identified risks of CAD and CVD events among 5 levels of SBP and DBP. </p> <p><b>Results:</b> During the study period 2,240 CAD and 3,207 CVD events occurred. Compared with SBP ≤119 mmHg, which was the lowest quintile of SBP, hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval) for CAD/CVD in the 4 higher quintiles (120-129, 130-139, 140-149, ≥150 mmHg) gradually increased from 2.10 (1.73 to 2.56)/ 1.46 (1.27 to 1.68) in quintile 2 to 3.21 (2.37 to 4.34)/4.76 (3.94 to 5.75) in quintile 5 for normoglycemia; from 1.39 (1.14 to 1.69)/1.70 (1.44 to 2.10) in quintile 2 to 2.52 (1.95 to 3.26)/4.12 (3.38 to 5.02) in quintile 5 for borderline glycemia; and from 1.50 (1.19 to 1.90)/1.72 (1.31 to 2.26) in quintile 2 to 2.52 (1.95 to 3.26)/3.54 (2.66 to 4.70) in quintile 5 for diabetes. A similar trend was observed for DBP across 4 quintiles (75-79, 80-84, 85-89, ≥90 mmHg) compared with ≤74 mmHg, which was the lowest quintile. </p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Results indicated that cardiovascular risks gradually increased with increases in SBP and DBP regardless of the presence of and degree of a glucose abnormality. Further interventional trials are required to apply findings from this cohort study to clinical practice. </p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed El Missiri ◽  
Walaa Adel Abdel Halim ◽  
Abdo Saleh Almaweri ◽  
Tarek Rashid Mohamed

Abstract Background Obesity is associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality effects. Cardiac rehabilitation programs cause a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and a reduction in all cardiovascular risk factors. Up to 80% of patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation programs are either overweight or obese. This study aimed to compare the effects of a phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation program on obese and non-obese patients with stable coronary artery disease following total revascularization by coronary angioplasty. Results This was a prospective study including 120 patients with stable coronary artery disease. Patients were enrolled in a 12-week phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation program. Patients were classified into two groups based on their body mass index (BMI): those with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 were considered non-obese (n = 58) while those with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were considered obese (n = 62). At baseline, BMI and blood pressure (BP) were recorded; fasting blood sugar, triglyceride levels, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were assessed; and echocardiography was used to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). These were re-assessed after completion of the program. At baseline, there were more females in the obese group 20 (32.25%) vs 6 (10.13%) (p = 0.04), more hypertensives (p = 0.023), and less smokers 32 (51%) vs 46 (79%) (p = 0.025). Obese patients achieved fewer metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs) 7.97 ± 2.4 vs 9.74 ± 2.47 (p = 0.007) and had higher LDL-C levels 121.63 ± 36.52 mg/dl vs 95.73 ± 31.51 mg/dl (p = 0.005). At the end of the program, obese patients showed more reduction in BMI − 1.78 ± 1.46 kg/m2 vs − 0. 60 ± 0.70 kg/m2 (p < 0.001) and systolic and diastolic BP (p = 0.016 and 0.038, respectively). LDL-C level was more reduced in the obese group − 25.76 ± 14.19 mg/dl vs − 17.37 ± 13.28 mg/dl (p = 0.022). Non-obese patients had more increase in LVEF (p = 0.024). There was no difference between obese and non-obese patients in the magnitude of increase in METs achieved (p = 0.21). Conclusion Cardiac rehabilitation programs lead to an improvement in cardiovascular disease risk factors with more reduction in BMI, BP, and LDL-C levels in obese patients compared to non-obese ones. LVEF was more increased in non-obese individuals. Exercise capacity in the form of METs achieved was equally improved in both groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document