Attitudes of intensive care and emergency physicians in Australia with regard to the organ donation process: A qualitative analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 1601-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Macvean ◽  
Eva YN Yuen ◽  
Gregory Tooley ◽  
Heather M Gardiner ◽  
Tess Knight

Specialized hospital physicians have direct capacity to impact Australia’s sub-optimal organ donation rates because of their responsibility to identify and facilitate donation opportunities. Australian physicians’ attitudes toward this responsibility are examined. A total of 12 intensive care unit and three emergency department physicians were interviewed using a constructionist grounded theory and situational analysis approach. A major theme emerged, related to physicians’ conflicts of interest in maintaining patients’/next-of-kin’s best interests and a sense of duty-of-care in this context. Two sub-themes related to this main theme were identified as follows: (1) discussions about organ donation and who is best to carry these out and (2) determining whether organ donation is part of end-of-life care; including the avoidance of non-therapeutic ventilation; and some reluctance to follow clinical triggers in the emergency department. Overall, participants indicated strong support for organ donation but would not consider it part of end-of-life care, representing a major obstacle to the support of potential donation opportunities. Findings have implications for physician education and training. Continued efforts are needed to integrate the potential for organ donation into end-of-life care within intensive care units and emergency departments.

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Y. Lee ◽  
K. Ranse ◽  
W. Silvester ◽  
A. Mehta ◽  
F. M. P. Van Haren

The incidence of organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) has steadily increased in recent years. Intensive care doctors are vital to the implementation of DCD and healthcare professionals’ attitudes to DCD can influence their participation. In order to determine ANZ intensive care doctors’ attitudes to DCD, to explore if demographic characteristics influence attitude to DCD and to assess if attitude to DCD can predict palliative prescription rationale at the end of life of DCD donors, a cross-sectional online survey was distributed to ANZ intensive care doctors and responses collected between 29 April and 10 June 2016. Exploratory factor analysis was used to define various attributes of attitude to DCD. Results were subjected to comparative statistical analyses to examine the relation between demographic data and attitude to DCD. Multiple regression models were used to examine if attitude to DCD could predict intensive care doctors’ palliative prescription rationales at the end of life of DCD donors. One hundred and sixty-one intensive care doctors responded to the survey with 69.4% having worked in intensive care for ten years or more. Respondents responded positively to the support of and perceived importance of DCD in helping those who would benefit from the donations (constructive attributes) (mean composite factor score = 3.84, standard deviation [SD] 0.83), they positively perceived that conducive and facilitative orchestration of DCD helps families cope (mean composite factor score = 3.94, SD 0.72) and that they would manage a DCD donor similar to any patient at the end of their life (mean score = 3.94, SD 0.72). Respondents responded negatively to having concerns that the circulatory death of potential DCD donors does not occur within the specified time frame (mean score = 2.28, SD 1.02). There was an association between organ donation professional education courses, familiarity with national guidelines and positive attitudes to certain attributes of attitude to DCD. Regression models demonstrated the attitude to DCD may predict intensive care doctors’ palliative medication prescription rationales at the end of life of the DCD donor. Intensive care doctors in ANZ adopt a morally neutral attitude to DCD where they recognise the importance of organ donation, and support and conduct DCD as a part of good end-of-life care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 1500-1504
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Leith ◽  
Nathan L. Haas ◽  
Carrie E. Harvey ◽  
Cynthia Chen ◽  
Crystal Ives Tallman ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renea L. Beckstrand ◽  
Lynn Clark Callister ◽  
Karin T. Kirchhoff

• Background Providing appropriate end-of-life care has become a primary concern of nurses and the public. The highly technological critical care environment may not facilitate such care. • Objective To collect suggestions from critical care nurses for improving end-of-life care in intensive care units. • Methods A geographically dispersed, random sample of 1409 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses was sent a 72-item survey on perceptions of end-of life care. The survey included a request for suggestions on ways to improve end-of life care. • Results Of the 861 critical care nurses who responded to the survey, 485 offered 530 suggestions for improving end-of-life care. Providing a “good death” was the major theme; specific suggestions included ways to help ensure death with dignity and peace. Barriers to providing good deaths included nursing time constraints, staffing patterns, communication challenges, and treatment decisions that were based on physicians’ rather than patients’ needs. Suggestions for providing a good death included facilitating dying with dignity; not allowing patients to be alone while dying; managing patients’ pain and discomfort; knowing, and then following, patients’ wishes for end-of-life care; promoting earlier cessation of treatment or not initiating aggressive treatment at all; and communicating effectively as a health-care team. Educational initiatives for professionals and the public were also suggested. • Conclusions Implementation of specific suggestions provided by experienced critical care nurses might increase the quality of end-of-life care, facilitating a good death for intensive care patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Schimmer ◽  
C Yildirim ◽  
M Oezkur ◽  
SP Sommer ◽  
B Hörning ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 003022282199770
Author(s):  
Janet Sopcheck ◽  
Ruth M. Tappen

Residents who are terminally ill often experience transfers to the emergency department resulting in hospitalizations, which may be potentially avoidable with treatment in the nursing home. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of 15 residents, 10 family members, and 20 nursing home staff regarding end-of-life care and the circumstances prompting resident transfers. Data analysis of participant interviews conducted January to May 2019 in a South Florida nursing home identified four themes related to transfer to the hospital: time left to live, when aggressive treatments would be unavailing, not knowing what the nursing home can do, and transfer decisions are situation-dependent. Study findings underscore the importance of increasing resident and family awareness of treatments available in the nursing home and person-centered advance care planning discussions. Further research should explore the reasons for residents’ and family members’ choice of aggressive therapies and their goals for care at the end of life.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 2207-2208
Author(s):  
Mohamed Y. Rady ◽  
Joseph L. Verheijde

Author(s):  
Cameron Stewart ◽  
Wendy Lipworth ◽  
Paul Komesaroff ◽  
Ian Kerridge

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document