scholarly journals Stereotypic morality: The influence of group membership on moral foundations

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 710-725
Author(s):  
Jeremy R. Winget ◽  
R. Scott Tindale
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Moral Foundations ◽  
Moral Foundations Theory ◽  
Group Level ◽  
Stereotype Content Model ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content

Today’s modern world affords many benefits, one of which is the ability to have near-instantaneous interactions with groups and cultures other than our own. Though advantageous in many situations, one challenge for these groups is navigating what they perceive to be right and wrong in a cooperative manner despite having different modes of morality. Moral foundations theory holds groups use the same moral foundations to guide their judgments and decision making, but there has been little research on how the perception of these foundations differs within and between groups. Thus, the current study examined how moral foundations operate from a group perspective and potential outgroup moderators of moral foundations. Participants rated the extent to which various groups used moral foundations in one of two conditions. Each condition contained an ingroup and three outgroups that conformed to the quadrants of the stereotype content model. Results showed significant differences in the harm, fairness, and loyalty foundations between ingroups and outgroups. Moreover, the type of outgroup significantly influenced moral foundations scores. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering moral foundations at the group level.

scholarly journals Stereotypic morality: The influence of group membership on moral foundations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy R. Winget ◽  
Scott Tindale
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Membership ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Moral Foundations ◽  
Moral Foundations Theory ◽  
Group Level ◽  
Stereotype Content Model ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content

Today’s modern world affords many benefits, one of which is the ability to have near-instantaneous interactions with groups and cultures other than our own. Though advantageous in many situations, one challenge for these groups is navigating what they perceive to be right and wrong in a cooperative manner despite having different modes of morality. Moral foundations theory holds groups use the same moral foundations to guide their judgments and decision making, but there has been little research on how the perception of these foundations differ within and between groups. Thus, the current study examined how moral foundations operate from a group perspective and potential outgroup moderators of moral foundations. Participants rated the extent to which various groups used moral foundations in one of two conditions. Each condition contained an ingroup and three outgroups that conformed to the quadrants of the stereotype content model. Results showed significant differences in the harm, fairness, and loyalty foundations between ingroups and outgroups. Moreover, the type of outgroup significantly influenced moral foundations scores. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering moral foundations at the group level.

scholarly journals Shaping the modern world with a stone-age brain: Brexit and the Moral Foundations Theory

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 863-889
Author(s):  
David S. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Evolutionary Psychology ◽  
Media Coverage ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Moral Foundations ◽  
Moral Foundations Theory ◽  
Stone Age ◽  
Contemporary Politics ◽  
Political Decisions ◽  
Evolutionary Criterion

Decision making is not always a reasoned process. It is often subject to reflexive heuristics. The Moral Foundations Theory is a popular theoretical framework that characterises political decisions by adherence to an evolutionary criterion. Based on recurrent ancestral pressures, this model anticipates our species’ tribal history has resulted in a set of intuitive ethics: Care/ Harm, Fairness/ Cheating, Loyalty/ Betrayal, Authority/ Subversion, and Sanctity/ Degradation. Focusing on the winning side, this paper analyses official communications, polling data and media coverage to explore how the Leave campaigners intentionally or unintentionally appealed to the public’s moral intuitions. In doing so, it aims to show why evolutionary psychology potentially offers a useful layer of analysis with which to understand contemporary politics.

The Tourist Stereotype Model: Positive and Negative Dimensions

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Wing Sun Tung ◽  
Brian Edward Melville King ◽  
Serene Tse
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Public Perceptions ◽  
Two Dimensions ◽  
Stereotype Content Model ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Destination Management Organizations ◽  
Additional Sample

This research proposes a measurement model to evaluate tourist stereotypes. Study 1 assesses the positive and negative tourist stereotypes that Hong Kong residents hold toward Chinese outbound tourists by connecting previous research on stereotypes from the Princeton Trilogy and from the stereotype content model. Six positive stereotypes were identified across two dimensions (i.e., Approachable: friendly, sincere, and good; and Competent: intelligent, industrious, and competent) as well as six inappropriate biases across two factors (i.e., Boastful: materialistic and loud; Rude: unreasonable, immoral, rude, and uncivilized). Study 2 provides further support for the measurement model by using an additional sample to investigate tourist self-stereotypes. Collectively, studies 1 and 2 contribute to the tourism literature by highlighting the dynamics involved in (self)-stereotyping that are relevant for destination management organizations (DMOs) and public policymakers involved in managing public perceptions of tourist stereotypes.

scholarly journals BENEVOLENT AGEISM: THE CORRELATES OF OVERACCOMMODATION TOWARDS OLDER ADULTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S970-S971
Author(s):  
Jennifer F Sublett ◽  
Toni L Bisconti
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Predictive Utility ◽  
Older Adulthood ◽  
Stereotype Content Model ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content ◽  
Environmental Mastery ◽  
The Face ◽  
Perceived Age

Abstract Using the Stereotype Content Model as a framework for understanding ageism, our two objectives are (1) examining the predictive utility of benevolent ageism on well-being outcomes and (2) identifying conditional relationships between sex, perceived age, benevolent ageism, and well-being outcomes. In a snowball sample of 150 older adults who were 65 years old and older, we examined sex, perceived age, ageism, environmental mastery, and depression. Our benevolent ageism scale is an expanded version of the Ambivalent Ageism Scale that included additional items of accommodation created by us. Environmental mastery and depression were assessed by standard, internally valid, measures. Using regression analyses, we found that benevolent ageism predicted depression above and beyond hostile ageism. Additionally, benevolent ageism uniquely predicted environmental mastery for men, whereas hostile ageism uniquely predicted environmental mastery and depression for women. Finally, perceived age was a better predictor of well-being than chronological age. It is essential to consider how benevolent ageism relates to well-being due to the tenets of the Stereotype Content Model. Additionally, delineating the ways that sex and perceived age contribute to double jeopardy vs. crisis competence in the face of benevolence will lead to a more intricate understanding of the paths in which overaccommodative behaviors relate to well-being in older adulthood.

scholarly journals YOUNG ADULTS STEREOTYPE OLDER SPEAKERS WHO ADOPTED A POWER POSE AS LESS COMPETENT COMPARED TO SUBMISSIVE OR CONTROL

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S80-S80
Author(s):  
Jennifer R Turner ◽  
Jennifer T Stanley
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Embodied Cognition ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Age Stereotypes ◽  
Stereotype Content Model ◽  
Representativeness Heuristic ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content ◽  
Within Subjects

Abstract Young adults (YA) frequently endorse age stereotypes (Levy, 2009). We examined whether older adult (OA) speakers influenced by embodied-cognition (“power posing”; Cuddy et al., 2015) would reduce YAs’ stereotype-related judgments. Following the Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske et al., 2002), we hypothesized that OA who held a power pose prior to giving their speech would be rated as higher in Competency, Performance, and Electability, but not Warmth. Sixty-three YA viewed and rated 9 videos of OA performing speeches after modeling a pose (power, submissive, control). Within-subjects ANOVAs revealed embodiment condition differences for Performance (F2,124 = 207.76, ηp2 = .77). For ratings of Performance, speakers in the power condition were judged worse than either submissive or control (ps < .001). For Warmth ratings, power (M = 4.81, SD = .62) was worse than control (M = 5.07, SD = .89, p = .003, d = .34), but submissive (M = 4.97, SD = .87) was not significantly different from either group. These results suggest that YA may judge the Performance and Warmth of OA who adopted a power pose harsher because OA are not supposed to be powerful or adopt expansive postures (consistent with the SCM). In comparison, YA may be drawing upon the Representativeness Heuristic of OA in positions of power (e.g., Senators) when rating Electability and Competence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document