The effect of pain management in reducing limb and spine radiography in stable traumatic patients admitted to the emergency department

Trauma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Torabi ◽  
Ali Mehri ◽  
Moghaddameh Mirzaei

Introduction Musculoskeletal pain caused by trauma is one of the common complaints of patients referred to the emergency department. Due to the lack of a proper pain control protocol, doctors and nurses do not pay attention to pain, and physicians may tend to request too many radiographs, many of which will be unnecessary. We aimed to study the effect of pain management by fentanyl in reducing the number of radiographs, reducing hospital costs and increasing satisfaction in the patients on patients with isolated trauma in limbs and spine causing musculoskeletal pain. Patients and methods A cohort of patients who were referred to the fast-track emergency department with isolated trauma of the upper and lower limbs or spine and triage levels 3, 4 and 5, were visited twice by an emergency medicine resident – before and after application of a pain management protocol using intravenous fentanyl as the principle analgesic. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in the number of radiographs requested; secondary outcomes included alterations in pain levels and patient satisfaction. Results A total of 158 patients were included in the study. The median age was 27.5 years, three quarters were male and 20.88% had a positive history of opium addiction. The number and costs of diagnostic radiography significantly decreased after the administration of fentanyl (P < 0.0001), as did pain levels measured on visual analogue scale with a consequent increase in patient satisfaction. There were only six complications resulting from fentanyl administration which were mild and transient. Follow-up after 24–72 h, revealed no missed fractures. Conclusions The administration of fentanyl as a strong analgesic as part of an emergency department pain management protocol for trauma patients can be performed with limited minor complications; it can reduce the number of unnecessary X-rays performed, exposure to ionizing radiation and hospital costs as well as improving patient satisfaction without missing fractures.

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
VCH Ng ◽  
FL Lau

Aim To review the clinical spectrum and outcome of radiological missed fractures in the Accident and Emergency Department of United Christian Hospital (UCH) in 2002. Method In UCH, radiologists report all X-Rays taken in the Accident and Emergency Department (AED) within 48 hours. The study period was from 1st January 2002 to 31st December 2002. AED notes, relevant clinical records and all X-rays of patients with suspected missed fractures as reported by radiologists were reviewed for information on clinical features, treatments and outcomes. Results A total of 286 cases of missed fractures were found. Fourteen (4.9%) involved the skull and maxillofacial region, 83 (29.0%) involved the chest region, 53 (18.5%) involved the spinal region, 72 (25.2%) involved the upper limbs and 64 (22.4%) involved the lower limbs. Of these 286 cases, 137 (47.9%) were followed up in AED, 90 (31.5%) were referred to specialist clinics for further management, 26 (9.1%) required admission to hospital for further assessment and treatment, and 33 (11.5%) defaulted follow up. Furthermore, 87 (30.4%) of these 286 missed fractures required a change in management plan: 3 missed fractures required operative intervention (internal fixation) and 84 missed fractures required some form of external immobilisation. This group of patient did not lodge any complaint or claim. Conclusion A&E doctors missed quite a number of fractures that might result in significant morbidity. However, a reporting system by radiologists within 48 hours from discharge can pick up all these missed fractures, and may prevent complaints and litigations.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Wazzan ◽  
Yazeed Albeladi ◽  
Rozan Altaifi ◽  
Mohammed Alqahtani ◽  
Rayan Bakheet

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Wazzan ◽  
Fidel Taguinoid ◽  
Rayan Bakheet ◽  
Rozan Altaifi ◽  
Mohammed Al-Sohail ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Swati Kanchan ◽  
Shripad Hebbar

Background: Patient satisfaction after a surgical procedure is an important outcome of hospital care. Many of the gynaecological menstrual problems such as abnormal uterine bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding requires endometrial evaluation which is done traditionally by dilatation and curettage. But this procedure is painful and requires appropriate pain management protocol. The aim is to evaluate the post-operative patient satisfaction following dilatation and curettage procedure.Methods: This study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital belonging to a medical college. A total of 236 patients were recruited for the study who subsequently underwent dilatation and curettage with different mode of Xylocaine anesthesia for pain relief. Of them 16 patients were excluded due to valid reasons and the remaining 220 were interviewed face to face following the procedure. The level of anxiety was assessed using Beck’s Anxiety inventory and also perception of satisfaction was documented along with complication related to the anesthesia.Results: The overall level of satisfaction was higher in the group receiving both paracervical block and intrauterine instillation of lidocaine during the procedure of dilatation and curettage. A further analysis showed that increase in level of satisfaction was due to improvement in pain scores due to combined mode of paracervical and endometrial anesthesia.Conclusions: A multimodal pain management protocol which involves pre-procedural sedation, combined cervical and endometrial anesthesia improves overall outcome with respect to reduction in anxiety scores and postoperative satisfaction levels.


2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Boessio dos Santos ◽  
Cristiana Maria Toscano ◽  
Ruth Ester Assayag Batista ◽  
Elena Bohomol

ABSTRACT Objectives: to assess the implementation of a nurse-initiated pain management protocol for patients triaged as semi-urgent, and its impact in pain intensity, in the Emergency Department. Methods: a prospective cohort study for adult patients with pain who had been triaged as semi-urgent and admitted to the hospital’s Emergency Department. Patients who received the intervention (pain-management protocol with analgesic administration) were compared to those who were managed using the conventional approach (physician evaluation prior to analgesic administration). Results: of the 185 patients included, 55 (30%) received the intervention, and 130 (70%) were managed conventionally. Patients in the intervention group were more likely to have taken pain medication in the 4 hours prior to admission, and reported higher levels of pain at admission and more significant reductions in pain level. Conclusions: despite low protocol adherence, the intervention resulted in higher reported pain relief.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document