scholarly journals Towards an object-relations theory of consumerism: The aesthetics of desire and the unfolding materiality of social life

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Woodward

This paper addresses some fundamental questions in the field of consumption studies through an exploration of literatures within object-relations psychoanalytic theory. It takes materiality as its central concern, dealing especially with questions of actor–commodity relations. In particular the paper uses the conceptual apparatus of the object-relations approach to propose a new way for theorizing aspects of consumption practice relating to person–object relationships. After situating the discussion within contemporary debates in consumption studies, the paper uses DW Winnicott's work as a point from which to integrate broader literatures on aesthetic experience and subject–object relations. The paper draws out the cultural implications and affinities of Winnicott's model and argues that his approach usefully suggests pathways for developing a model of consumption which neither reduces person–object exchanges to the psyche, assemblages of practices, or to the dead hand of social-structural forces. Rather, it is argued that Winnicott's model is suggestive of the more widespread and powerful cultural implications arising from relations between actors and objects of consumption.

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-51
Author(s):  
Seán Kennedy

This essay reads Beckett's relationship to psychoanalysis as a central concern of Molloy, arguing that Molloy's quest for mother traces Beckett's re-evaluation of the British school of object-relations theory of Wilfred Bion and Donald Winnicott. Tracing fine furniture, in Irish literature of the 1920s and 1930s, as an objective correlative of Anglo-Irish distinction, and linking that tradition to a Winnicottian reading of Molloy's impulsive theft of silverware, I argue that Molloy parodies the language of object-relations in order to situate Beckett newly in relation to it. In other words, Beckett intimates that Molloy's unhealthy obsession with mother is mirrored in psychoanalytic theory itself. In this way, writing Molloy allows him to re-evaluate psychoanalysis in its obsession with ‘mother’ as the founding site of psychic health and wellness.


1979 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 557-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.M. Robertson

In this second part of a review of the psychoanalytic theory of depression the major themes of the theory, as they appear in the works of the major contributors, are discussed. It is difficult to approach the complexities and ambiguities of psychoanalytic theory in general, and the theory of depression in particular, without an historical perspective. Accordingly, the author decided to group the major themes of the theory under three headings: Instinct Theory, Structural Theory, Object Relations Theory. The themes included under Instinct Theory are constitutional factors, aggression and orality. Under the heading of Structural Theory those themes associated with the ego, with the concepts of narcissism and the self, and finally those associated with the superego are discussed. It is of note that under narcissism the work of both Kohut and Kernberg is considered, including its relevance to any investigation of depression. The concepts of object loss and object failure are discussed under the heading of Object Relations Theory. It is suggested that a psychoanalytic approach has much to offer both the clinician and the researcher in their attempts to develop a comprehensive theory to explain the protean manifestations of human depression.


1955 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-367
Author(s):  
Dan L. Adler

Author(s):  
Graham S. Clarke

In what follows I will develop an account of Fairbairn's object relations theory as I have understood and developed it, and, apply that theory to an understanding of the threeact opera King Roger, Op. 26 (1926) by Karol Szymanowski. My Fairbairnian approaches to the opera come from my previous work on Fairbairn's object relations theory. In order to fully understand the first of the approaches I employ you may need to read my book Personal Relations Theory (Clarke, 2006), in particular chapters one, five, and six. In order to fully understand the second of the approaches I am using you need to read Thinking Through Fairbairn (Clarke, 2018a), in particular chapters two, three, and four, as well as my paper in the journal Attachment (Clarke, 2018b) on MPD/DID and Fernando Pessoa's heteronyms.


Author(s):  
Jay R. Greenberg ◽  
Stephen A. Mitchell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document