Who are our owners? Exploring the ownership links of businesses to identify illicit financial flows

2021 ◽  
pp. 147737082098036
Author(s):  
Alberto Aziani ◽  
Joras Ferwerda ◽  
Michele Riccardi
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Economic Incentives ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Holding Companies ◽  
Business Ownership ◽  
Cultural Proximity ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
High Level

This article investigates the patterns of business ownership in Europe, using a unique dataset on the nationality of 28.7 million shareholders of companies registered in 41 European countries. By means of an exploratory multivariate analysis, it tests whether ownership links between different countries are driven exclusively by social and macroeconomic variables – such as trade or geographical or cultural proximity – or are also related to measures of financial secrecy, corruption and lack of compliance with anti-money laundering regulations. The results indicate that factors other than licit economic incentives explain the international ownership structure of European companies. European firms have an abnormal number (that is, above the predicted value) of owners from tax havens and countries with poor financial transparency, which may suggest the use of holding companies for money laundering and tax evasion and to conceal illicit financial flows. However, ceteris paribus, the number of owners is abnormal in countries where rule of law and the control of corruption are more effective, suggesting that a high level of corruption may be a cost in money laundering activities. The findings contribute to the current international debate on illicit financial flows – as framed by United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16.4 – and can be used by public agencies and private actors to detect anomalies in business ownership and prevent potential financial crime schemes at corporate level.

Curbing Illicit Financial Flows

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodon Liang
Keyword(s):  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
International System ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Incentive Structure ◽  
Global Finance ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Playing Field ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows

Illicit financial flows (IFFs) drain state finances and economic vitality, with disproportionate impact on developing economies. IFFs—including money laundering, tax evasion, and tax avoidance—pose a transnational problem addressed so far through international regimes of coordination and cooperation. But meaningful reductions in IFFs require addressing the root of the problem: information asymmetries. Developed nations and tax havens know where money is hidden and profits are made, while developing nations do not. Since the international system of global finance creates the incentive structure and permissive environment for illicit flows, it is at this level that states must focus their policy-making attention. New information-sharing mechanisms, such as automatic exchange of tax information and public country-by-country tax reporting, can level the playing field and enable lower-income states to effectively address the IFF problem.

Addressing illicit financial flows in Africa

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1074-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Otto Schlenther
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Profit Shifting ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Priority Areas ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows

Purpose This paper aims to identify the underlying key components of illicit financial flows (IFFs) and highlights the priority areas where government resources should be pooled under a whole of government approach to mitigate the risks posed by IFFs. These areas are tax avoidance and tax evasion (specifically intra-company profit shifting, investment and profit shifting within the extractive sector, fraud and beneficial ownership), anti-corruption measures, governance and accountability measures, anti-money laundering effectiveness and effectiveness in the detection of falsified customs declarations. Design/methodology/approach The concept of IFFs is emerging as an umbrella term for bringing together seemingly disconnected issues. The concept is ill-defined, but there are various identifiable components supporting the term IFF such as capital flight, corruption, money laundering, tax avoidance, tax havens and transfer pricing practices. The author identifies the key areas of concern through a literature review and recommends prioritization of short- to medium-term risk areas and long-term policy imperatives. Findings In the short- to medium-term, an effective “whole-of-government” approach should be based on uniform risk identification and prioritization between mandated government agencies and in the long run, it should be focused on building responsive and effective institutions through a process of good governance and effective taxation. Originality/value A large body of literature deals with “IFFs” and the “whole-of-government approach” as separate concepts. This paper draws on the existing literature and identifies priority areas for addressing IFFs, and, for these to be successful, they are entirely dependent on a whole-of-government approach – both in the short and long run.

scholarly journals How Big Are Illicit Financial Flows?

2021 ◽  
pp. 75-88
Author(s):  
Joras Ferwerda ◽  
Brigitte Unger
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Tax Regulation

In recent years several leaks have given us insight into how the wealthy and criminals hide their money. The boom of leaks has resulted in a ‘hot phase’ in tax regulation. As a result, the number of studies that want to measure illicit financial flows has also increased. This chapter tries to provide an overview of this booming new field. What do all these studies teach us about the seriousness and size of tax avoidance, tax evasion, and money laundering? What is precisely measured, and how? This chapter concludes that the term ‘Illicit Financial Flows’ has become a bit of a floating identifier, a name that is vague enough to be used for many different concepts but at the cost of losing its meaning. We argue that decomposing the problem of illicit financial flows and what each study aims to measure, might give more useful insights.

Illicit Financial Flows: Concepts, Measurement, and Evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-86
Author(s):  
Matthew Collin
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Empirical Work ◽  
Risk Indicators ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Illicit Flows ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
The Subject

Abstract There is a growing consensus that the presence of illegal and harmful cross-border financial flows is one of the factors impeding economic and human development. In recent years, a new conceptual framework for describing these “illicit” financial flows (IFFs) has emerged that combines issues ranging from cross-border money laundering to tax evasion. This article summarizes and clarifies recent empirical work in this area. Three types of studies are considered and critiqued: (i) methods of measuring IFFs, (ii) constructed risk indicators, and (iii) forensic studies that aim to uncover instances where illicit flows have occurred. The article discusses the limitations of all three approaches and proposes ways in which the research agenda on IFFs could be reasonably advanced, given the hidden nature of the subject.

scholarly journals Illicit financial flows and foreign direct investment in developing countries

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-447
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Innocents Edoun ◽  
Alexandre Essome Dipita ◽  
Dikgang Motsepe
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Direct Investment ◽  
Interest Rates ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Direct Investment ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows

Africa is facing a number of challenges that are negatively affecting socio-economic development at all levels of governments and local governments are expected to play a leading role for Africa’s development. One of these challenges are illicit financial flows that are perceived by many as a crime against Africa’s transformation. The continent is losing billions of dollars every year because of tax evasion, corruption and inappropriate transfer pricing and maladministration. With tax being one of Africa’s main sources of revenue, current and past researches revealed that, illicit financial flows (IFFs) cripple African Governments tax base as a results of capital outflows and lack of good governance. This situation obviously is a challenge for Africa’s development as governments struggle to finance structuring projects and this in turn compels these governments to seek funds from international organisations at very high interest rates. It is also important to reveal that Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) rapidly grew after the Second World War with the intention to maximize profit on investment in less developed countries and specifically in the African continent. In competing in Africa, most multinationals main objective is to pay less tax, make extensive profits and transfer the proceeds to their country of origin. This subsequently gave rise to illicit financial flows in Africa where the continent is losing billions of dollars. Past studies equally revealed that, Africa’s revenue could increase between 55 and 65%, if appropriate mechanisms of monitoring the flows were in place. This study therefore is based on the premise that, tax evasion, illicit financial flows, corruption and abusive transfers pricing are all factors that affect Africa’s development. Using appropriate method of inquiry, this study wants to demonstrate the presence of FDI’s in Africa as a modus operandi behind tax evasion. It also using the “Appropriability Theory” to explain the rationale for FDI in Africa.

How Countries Should Share Tax Information

2019 ◽  
pp. 303-322
Author(s):  
Arthur J. Cockfield
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Transaction Costs ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Academic Support ◽  
Tax Planning ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Optimal Outcomes ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
International Tax

This chapter looks at exchange of information (EOI) policies, proposing several ways to make EOI policies fairer and more efficient, so as to maximize their potential to reduce illicit financial flows and curb abusive tax practices that undermine human rights. While there appears increasing policy and academic support for EOI initiatives that promote global financial transparency, the current international tax regime, with its high transaction costs for taxpayers and tax authorities, does not seem particularly amenable to producing optimal outcomes. The chapter then emphasizes how, to promote enforceability, the ideal EOI system delivers high-quality tax information while providing needed legal protections for taxpayer privacy. The exchange and usage of high-quality tax information would reduce transaction costs for tax authorities as they could more readily identify taxpayers engaged in offshore tax evasion and aggressive international tax planning.

Illicit money flows pose Africa development dilemma

2015 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
African Union ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Macroeconomic Fundamentals ◽  
Money Flows ◽  
Commodity Export ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
High Level ◽  
Effective Use

Subject Illicit money flows from Africa. Significance Illicit financial flows (IFFs) could cost sub-Saharan African (SSA) states up to 50 billion dollars per year in lost revenues, according to a high-level UN panel. The new report, commissioned by the African Union and SSA finance ministers, highlights the detrimental development consequences of IFFs -- in a context where many states are battling with declining commodity export revenues and rising debt burdens. Impacts In SSA states with weak macroeconomic fundamentals and rising debt servicing costs will exacerbate fiscal losses caused by IFFs. Nevertheless, the attractiveness of bond issuances as a form of cheap capital (with minimal conditions) means further issuances are likely. Yet buyers of SSA paper are likely to become more discerning, making it harder for issuers to borrow on favourable terms. Efforts to curtail poaching will be assisted by drone technology in Southern Africa, but their effective use risks community-level blowback.

London summit will improve global tax transparency

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Political Commitment ◽  
Slow Process ◽  
Political Leaders ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Beneficial Ownership ◽  
Illicit Financial Flows ◽  
High Level ◽  
New Instruments

Subject Anti-corruption summit outcome. Significance New transparency initiatives at the anti-corruption summit promise to inhibit illicit financial flows. The summit has given political momentum to the traditionally bureaucratic and slow process of implementing anti-corruption conventions, together with creating new instruments. Impacts Transparency over beneficial ownership will make it harder for individuals to avoid tax and will increase scrutiny over financial flows. Nevertheless, corrupt elites and criminal gangs will still have numerous routes through which to channel their money. High-level political commitment to fight corruption will provide a benchmark against which political leaders can be held to account.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document