scholarly journals Physician Attitudes Toward Living Kidney Donation

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Trachtman ◽  
Brendan Parent ◽  
Ari Kirshenbaum ◽  
Arthur Caplan
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Physician Attitudes ◽  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Living Donation ◽  
Living Kidney Donation ◽  
Kidney Donor ◽  
Living Kidney Donor ◽  
Kidney Donors ◽  
Living Kidney Donors

Background: Compared to dialysis, living kidney donation has a greater chance of restoring health and is associated with better outcomes than deceased kidney donation. Although physicians advocate for this treatment, it is uncertain how they would act as potential living kidney donors or recipients. Methods: We surveyed 104 physicians, pediatric, and internal medicine nephrologists, to ascertain their attitudes toward living donation. Results: Among surveyed nephrologists, there was nearly universal support for living kidney donation as a viable medical option, and nearly all of them would support a healthy and medically cleared patient who wishes to participate. Although support was still strong, nephrologists were significantly less likely to support their friends and relatives participating in living kidney donation, and their support declined further for friends and relatives donating to nonrelatives. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the need to more deeply examine physician-perceived risks involved in serving as a living kidney donor. Based on differences in surveyed nephrologist attitudes regarding donation to and from loved ones versus nonrelatives, we suggest that physicians should give careful consideration to how they describe the risks of living donation to potential donors.

scholarly journals Perioperative Complications During Living Donor Nephrectomy: Results From a Multicenter Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205435811985771
Author(s):  
Carlos Garcia-Ochoa ◽  
Liane S. Feldman ◽  
Christopher Nguan ◽  
Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros ◽  
Jennifer Arnold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Living Kidney Donation ◽  
Kidney Donor ◽  
Living Kidney Donor ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Kidney Donors ◽  
Living Kidney Donors

Background: While living kidney donation is considered safe in healthy individuals, perioperative complications can occur due to several factors. Objective: We explored associations between the incidence of perioperative complications and donor characteristics, surgical technique, and surgeon’s experience in a large contemporary cohort of living kidney donors. Design: Living kidney donors enrolled prospectively in a multicenter cohort study with some data collected retrospectively after enrollment was complete (eg, surgeon characteristics). Setting: Living kidney donor centers in Canada (n = 12) and Australia (n = 5). Patients: Living kidney donors who donated between 2004 and 2014 and the surgeons who performed the living kidney donor nephrectomies. Measurements: Operative and hospital discharge medical notes were collected prospectively, with data on perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) information abstracted from notes after enrollment was complete. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo system and further classified into minor and major. In 2016, surgeons who performed the nephrectomies were invited to fill an online survey on their training and experience. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to compare perioperative complication rates between different groups of donors. The effect of surgeon characteristics on the complication rate was explored using a similar approach. Poisson regression was used to test rates of overall perioperative complications between high- and low-volume centers. Results: Of the 1421 living kidney donor candidates, 1042 individuals proceeded with donation, where 134 (13% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11%-15%]) experienced 142 perioperative complications (55 intraoperative; 87 postoperative). The most common intraoperative complication was organ injury and the most common postoperative complication was ileus. No donors died in the perioperative period. Most complications were minor (90% of 142 complications [95% CI: 86%-96%]); however, 12 donors (1% of 1042 [95% CI: 1%-2%]) experienced a major complication. No statistically significant differences were observed between donor groups and the rate of complications. A total of 43 of 48 eligible surgeons (90%) completed the online survey. Perioperative complication rates did not vary significantly by surgeon characteristics or by high- versus low-volume centers. Limitations: Operative and discharge reporting is not standardized and varies among surgeons. It is possible that some complications were missed. The online survey for surgeons was completed retrospectively, was based on self-report, and has not been validated. We had adequate statistical power only to detect large effects for factors associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications. Conclusions: This study confirms the safety of living kidney donation as evidenced by the low rate of major perioperative complications. We did not identify any donor or surgeon characteristics associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications. Trial registration(s): NCT00319579: A Prospective Study of Living Kidney Donation ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00319579 ) NCT00936078: Living Kidney Donor Study ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00936078 )

P1718COMPARISON OF MEASURED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE USING 24-HOUR URINE CREATININE CLEARANCE WITH 51-CHROMIUM EDTA IN A MALAYSIAN COHORT OF LIVING KIDNEY DONOR CANDIDATES

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chee Keong Thye ◽  
Yee Wan Lee ◽  
Maisarah Jalalonmuhali ◽  
Soo Kun Lim ◽  
Kok Peng Ng
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Kidney Donor ◽  
Living Kidney Donor ◽  
Kidney Donors ◽  
Living Kidney Donors ◽  
51Cr Edta

Abstract Background and Aims All living kidney donors undergo assessment of renal function by evaluation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR). 51Cr-EDTA is one of the most widely used marker for measuring GFR but it is hampered by cost and laboriousness as well as not being widely available in Malaysia. Measuring 24-hour urine for creatinine clearance (Ccr) is a common alternative when exogenous filtration markers are not available. Ccr suffers from over/underestimation of measured GFR (mGFR) due to errors in urine collection and tubular secretion of creatinine. This is a study to compare the correlation of Ccr against 51Cr-EDTA in measuring GFR among the living donors in Malaysian population. Method This is a cross-sectional, single-centre study of a cohort of living kidney donor candidates from January 2007 to March 2019. All candidates who had mGFR done with both 51Cr-EDTA and Ccr in University Malaya Medical Centre were enrolled. Special consideration was taken to account for adequate urine sampling for Ccr. Clinical data was analysed for correlation, bias, precision and accuracy between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA. Results A total of 83 living kidney donors with a mean age of 45.60 ± 11.06 years and body mass index (BMI) of 24.36 ± 4.03 were enrolled. Female comprised 74.7% of the donors while Chinese, Malay and Indian accounted for 67.5%, 20.5% and 7.2% of the donors respectively. The study group had a mean serum creatinine of 63.37 ± 16.00 umol/L with a urine volume of 2.03 ± 0.81 L (range 0.70 – 3.82). mGFR from 51Cr-EDTA was 125.56 ± 27.64 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 77.0 – 194.3) whereas calculated Ccr was 136.05 ± 36.15 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 75.32 – 280.06). The correlation coefficient between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA is moderate (r = 0.43) (p < 0.01). Mean absolute bias between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA was 10.59 ± 37.99 ml/min/1.73m2 (p < 0.05). The accuracy of Ccr within 30% of 51Cr-EDTA was 77.11%. Conclusion Our study showed that Ccr significantly overestimates mGFR compared to 51Cr-EDTA. However, there is a significantly moderate positive correlation between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA. Thus, in the absence of 51Cr-EDTA, Ccr is a clinically acceptable alternative if utilized with care and understanding its limitations.

The Risk in Living Kidney Donation

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
WALTER GLANNON
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Lifetime Risk ◽  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Living Kidney Donation ◽  
Kidney Donors ◽  
Living Kidney Donors ◽  
Closing The Gap ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Abstract:This article examines two questions. (1) If prospective living kidney donors knew of the lifetime risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in their remaining kidney, then would they be as willing to give it up? and (2) What should transplant organizations and physicians be telling those who express an interest in donating a kidney about risk? Based on the principle that prospective donors must be fully informed of the risk, I raise the issue of a possible obstacle to closing the gap between the availability and need of transplantable kidneys. Some strategies are offered to address this problem.

scholarly journals Self-Reported Incident Hypertension and Long-Term Kidney Function in Living Kidney Donors Compared with Healthy Nondonors

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1493-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtenay M. Holscher ◽  
Christine E. Haugen ◽  
Kyle R. Jackson ◽  
Jacqueline M. Garonzik Wang ◽  
Madeleine M. Waldram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Living Kidney Donation ◽  
Kidney Donors ◽  
Incident Hypertension ◽  
Living Kidney Donors ◽  
Parametric Survival Model ◽  
Yearly Change ◽  
Parametric Survival ◽  
Multilevel Linear Regression

Background and objectivesThe risk of hypertension attributable to living kidney donation remains unknown as does the effect of developing postdonation hypertension on subsequent eGFR. We sought to understand the association between living kidney donation, hypertension, and long-term eGFR by comparing donors with a cohort of healthy nondonors.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe compared 1295 living kidney donors with median 6 years of follow-up with a weighted cohort of 8233 healthy nondonors. We quantified the risk of self-reported hypertension using a parametric survival model. We examined the association of hypertension with yearly change in eGFR using multilevel linear regression and clustering by participant, with an interaction term for race.ResultsKidney donation was independently associated with a 19% higher risk of hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.41; P=0.04); this association did not vary by race (interaction P=0.60). For white and black nondonors, there was a mean decline in eGFR (−0.4 and −0.3 ml/min per year, respectively) that steepened after incident hypertension (−0.8 and −0.9 ml/min per year, respectively; both P<0.001). For white and black kidney donors, there was a mean increase in eGFR after donation (+0.4 and +0.6 ml/min per year, respectively) that plateaued after incident hypertension (0 and −0.2 ml/min per year, respectively; P=0.07 and P=0.01, respectively, after hypertension).ConclusionsKidney donors are at higher risk of hypertension than similar healthy nondonors, regardless of race. Donors who developed hypertension had a plateau in the usual postdonation increase of eGFR.

scholarly journals A multicenter cohort study of potential living kidney donors provides predictors of living kidney donation and non-donation

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 1249-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillippa K. Bailey ◽  
Charles R.V. Tomson ◽  
Stephanie MacNeill ◽  
Ann Marsden ◽  
Dominique Cook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Kidney Donation ◽  
Living Kidney Donation ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Kidney Donors ◽  
Living Kidney Donors ◽  
Multicenter Cohort
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document