scholarly journals CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LIVING KIDNEY DONOR PROFILE INDEX IN LIVING KIDNEY DONORS FOR PREDICTING OF POST-TRANSPLANT OUTCOME: KOREAN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION REGISTRY

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (S3) ◽  
pp. S403-S403
Author(s):  
Min Hye Kang ◽  
Ji Yoon Kong ◽  
Cheol-Woong Jung ◽  
Deok Gie Kim ◽  
Yeong Hoon Kim ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chee Keong Thye ◽  
Yee Wan Lee ◽  
Maisarah Jalalonmuhali ◽  
Soo Kun Lim ◽  
Kok Peng Ng

Abstract Background and Aims All living kidney donors undergo assessment of renal function by evaluation of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR). 51Cr-EDTA is one of the most widely used marker for measuring GFR but it is hampered by cost and laboriousness as well as not being widely available in Malaysia. Measuring 24-hour urine for creatinine clearance (Ccr) is a common alternative when exogenous filtration markers are not available. Ccr suffers from over/underestimation of measured GFR (mGFR) due to errors in urine collection and tubular secretion of creatinine. This is a study to compare the correlation of Ccr against 51Cr-EDTA in measuring GFR among the living donors in Malaysian population. Method This is a cross-sectional, single-centre study of a cohort of living kidney donor candidates from January 2007 to March 2019. All candidates who had mGFR done with both 51Cr-EDTA and Ccr in University Malaya Medical Centre were enrolled. Special consideration was taken to account for adequate urine sampling for Ccr. Clinical data was analysed for correlation, bias, precision and accuracy between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA. Results A total of 83 living kidney donors with a mean age of 45.60 ± 11.06 years and body mass index (BMI) of 24.36 ± 4.03 were enrolled. Female comprised 74.7% of the donors while Chinese, Malay and Indian accounted for 67.5%, 20.5% and 7.2% of the donors respectively. The study group had a mean serum creatinine of 63.37 ± 16.00 umol/L with a urine volume of 2.03 ± 0.81 L (range 0.70 – 3.82). mGFR from 51Cr-EDTA was 125.56 ± 27.64 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 77.0 – 194.3) whereas calculated Ccr was 136.05 ± 36.15 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 75.32 – 280.06). The correlation coefficient between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA is moderate (r = 0.43) (p < 0.01). Mean absolute bias between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA was 10.59 ± 37.99 ml/min/1.73m2 (p < 0.05). The accuracy of Ccr within 30% of 51Cr-EDTA was 77.11%. Conclusion Our study showed that Ccr significantly overestimates mGFR compared to 51Cr-EDTA. However, there is a significantly moderate positive correlation between Ccr and 51Cr-EDTA. Thus, in the absence of 51Cr-EDTA, Ccr is a clinically acceptable alternative if utilized with care and understanding its limitations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Trachtman ◽  
Brendan Parent ◽  
Ari Kirshenbaum ◽  
Arthur Caplan

Background: Compared to dialysis, living kidney donation has a greater chance of restoring health and is associated with better outcomes than deceased kidney donation. Although physicians advocate for this treatment, it is uncertain how they would act as potential living kidney donors or recipients. Methods: We surveyed 104 physicians, pediatric, and internal medicine nephrologists, to ascertain their attitudes toward living donation. Results: Among surveyed nephrologists, there was nearly universal support for living kidney donation as a viable medical option, and nearly all of them would support a healthy and medically cleared patient who wishes to participate. Although support was still strong, nephrologists were significantly less likely to support their friends and relatives participating in living kidney donation, and their support declined further for friends and relatives donating to nonrelatives. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the need to more deeply examine physician-perceived risks involved in serving as a living kidney donor. Based on differences in surveyed nephrologist attitudes regarding donation to and from loved ones versus nonrelatives, we suggest that physicians should give careful consideration to how they describe the risks of living donation to potential donors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205435811985771
Author(s):  
Carlos Garcia-Ochoa ◽  
Liane S. Feldman ◽  
Christopher Nguan ◽  
Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros ◽  
Jennifer Arnold ◽  
...  

Background: While living kidney donation is considered safe in healthy individuals, perioperative complications can occur due to several factors. Objective: We explored associations between the incidence of perioperative complications and donor characteristics, surgical technique, and surgeon’s experience in a large contemporary cohort of living kidney donors. Design: Living kidney donors enrolled prospectively in a multicenter cohort study with some data collected retrospectively after enrollment was complete (eg, surgeon characteristics). Setting: Living kidney donor centers in Canada (n = 12) and Australia (n = 5). Patients: Living kidney donors who donated between 2004 and 2014 and the surgeons who performed the living kidney donor nephrectomies. Measurements: Operative and hospital discharge medical notes were collected prospectively, with data on perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) information abstracted from notes after enrollment was complete. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo system and further classified into minor and major. In 2016, surgeons who performed the nephrectomies were invited to fill an online survey on their training and experience. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to compare perioperative complication rates between different groups of donors. The effect of surgeon characteristics on the complication rate was explored using a similar approach. Poisson regression was used to test rates of overall perioperative complications between high- and low-volume centers. Results: Of the 1421 living kidney donor candidates, 1042 individuals proceeded with donation, where 134 (13% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11%-15%]) experienced 142 perioperative complications (55 intraoperative; 87 postoperative). The most common intraoperative complication was organ injury and the most common postoperative complication was ileus. No donors died in the perioperative period. Most complications were minor (90% of 142 complications [95% CI: 86%-96%]); however, 12 donors (1% of 1042 [95% CI: 1%-2%]) experienced a major complication. No statistically significant differences were observed between donor groups and the rate of complications. A total of 43 of 48 eligible surgeons (90%) completed the online survey. Perioperative complication rates did not vary significantly by surgeon characteristics or by high- versus low-volume centers. Limitations: Operative and discharge reporting is not standardized and varies among surgeons. It is possible that some complications were missed. The online survey for surgeons was completed retrospectively, was based on self-report, and has not been validated. We had adequate statistical power only to detect large effects for factors associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications. Conclusions: This study confirms the safety of living kidney donation as evidenced by the low rate of major perioperative complications. We did not identify any donor or surgeon characteristics associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications. Trial registration(s): NCT00319579: A Prospective Study of Living Kidney Donation ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00319579 ) NCT00936078: Living Kidney Donor Study ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00936078 )


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e033906
Author(s):  
Phillippa K Bailey ◽  
Katie Wong ◽  
Matthew Robb ◽  
Lisa Burnapp ◽  
Alistair Rogers ◽  
...  

BackgroundA living-donor kidney transplant is the best treatment for most people with kidney failure. Population cohort studies have shown that lifetime living kidney donor risk is modified by sex, age, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), comorbidity and relationship to the recipient.ObjectivesWe investigated whether the UK population of living kidney donors has changed over time, investigating changes in donor demographics.DesignWe undertook a cross-sectional analysis of the UK living kidney donor registry between January 2006 to December 2017. Data were available on living donor sex, age, ethnicity, BMI, hypertension and relationship to recipient.SettingUK living donor registry.Participants11 651 consecutive living kidney donors from January 2006 to December 2017.Outcome measuresLiving kidney donor demographic characteristics (sex, age, ethnicity, BMI and relationship to the transplant recipient) were compared across years of donation activity. Donor characteristics were also compared across different ethnic groups.ResultsOver the study period, the mean age of donors increased (from 45.8 to 48.7 years, p<0.001), but this change appears to have been limited to the White population of donors. Black donors were younger than White donors, and a greater proportion were siblings of their intended recipient and male. The proportion of non-genetically related non-partner donations increased over the 12-year period of analysis (p value for linear trend=0.002).ConclusionsThe increasing age of white living kidney donors in the UK has implications for recipient and donor outcomes. Despite an increase in the number of black, Asian and minority ethnic individuals waitlisted for a kidney transplant, there has been no increase in the ethnic diversity of UK living kidney donors. Black donors in the UK may be at a much greater risk of developing kidney failure due to accumulated risks: whether these risks are being communicated needs to be investigated.


2020 ◽  
pp. 152692482097859
Author(s):  
Kara Schick-Makaroff ◽  
Rebecca E. Hays ◽  
Julia Hunt ◽  
Laura A Taylor ◽  
Dianne LaPointe Rudow

Introduction: Although informed consent content elements are prescribed in detailed regulatory guidance, many live kidney donors describe feeling underprepared and under informed. The goal of this pilot study was to explore the educational components needed to support an informed decision-making process for living kidney donors. Methods/Approach: A qualitative description design was conducted with thematic analysis of 5 focus groups with 2 cohorts: living kidney donor candidates (n = 11) and living kidney donors (n = 8). Findings: The educational components needed to engage in an informed decision-making process were: 1) contingent upon, and motivated by, personal circumstances; 2) supported through explanation of risks and benefits; 3) enhanced by understanding the overall donation experience; and 4) personalized by talking to another donor. Discussion: Tailoring education to meet the needs for fully informed decision-making is essential. Current education requirements, as defined by regulatory bodies, remain challenging to transplant teams attempting to ensure fully informed consent of living kidney donor candidates. Information on the emotional, financial, and overall life impact is needed, along with acknowledgement of relational ties driving donor motivations and the hoped-for recipient outcomes. Discussion of care practices, and access to peer mentoring may further strengthen the informed decision-making process


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 896-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit X. Garg ◽  
Andrew S. Levey ◽  
Bertram L. Kasiske ◽  
Michael Cheung ◽  
Krista L. Lentine ◽  
...  

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2017 “Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors” was developed to assist medical professionals who evaluate living kidney donor candidates and provide care before, during, and after donation. This guideline Work Group concluded that a comprehensive approach to donor candidate risk assessment should replace eligibility decisions on the basis of assessments of single risk factors in isolation. To address all issues important to living donors in a pragmatic and comprehensive guideline, many of the guideline recommendations were on the basis of expert consensus opinion even when no direct evidence was available. To advance available evidence, original data analyses were also undertaken to produce a “proof-of-concept” risk projection model for kidney failure. This was done to illustrate how the community can advance a new quantitative framework of risk that considers each candidate’s profile of demographic and health characteristics. A public review by stakeholders and subject matter experts as well as industry and professional organizations informed the final formulation of the guideline. This review highlights the guideline framework, key concepts, and recommendations, and uses five patient scenarios and 12 guideline statements to illustrate how the guideline can be applied to support living donor evaluation and care in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Okubo ◽  
Hideki Yokoi ◽  
Kaoru Sakai ◽  
Takeshi Matsubara ◽  
Motoko Yanagita

Abstract Background and Aims Renal function decreases with aging. Aging is associated with significant changes in structure and function of the kidney. On the macrostructural level, kidney cortical volume decreases, therefore total kidney volume (TKV) also decreases with aging. On the microstructural level, the number of glomerulosclerosis increases, therefore nephron number decreases with aging. Some reports show that the decline of TKV and nephron number is accompanied by a reduction in renal function. However, in the field of living kidney transplantation, TKV and glomerulosclerosis are not fully evaluated as factors influencing the donor’s post-transplant renal function. Living kidney transplantation is an established renal replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease patients. To predict living kidney recipient’s renal function, one-hour protocol biopsy is conducted during the operation. From one-hour protocol biopsy, donor’s pathophysiological findings such as glomerulosclerosis can be evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the correlation of potential influencing factors including TKV and glomerulosclerosis with pre- and post-transplant renal function in living kidney donors. Method This is a retrospective study including all 37 living related kidney donors seen at Kyoto University Hospital from January 2013 to April 2019. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using equation for Japanese population from serum creatinine levels at pre- and post-transplant. TKV was calculated from the 3D volume-rendered images of enhanced CT (=π/6×length×width×thickness), and adjusted to standard body surface area (BSA) by individual BSA. The ratio of number of non-glomerulosclerosis per that of whole glomeruli (non-GS) was evaluated by protocol renal biopsy at one hour after renal reperfusion. This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on human research of the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. Results We evaluated 37 living kidney donors (35.1% male, mean age 58.2 ± 12.0 years). Mean pre-transplant eGFR was 75.7 ± 12.1 ml/min/1.73m2, mean post-transplant eGFR; 44.9 ± 7.75 ml/min/1.73m2, adjusted TKV (aTKV); 349.3 ± 58.4 ml, and non-GS; 0.892 ± 0.086. Pre-transplant eGFR was associated with aTKV and aTKV×nonGS (r=0.525, 0.569 respectively, p&lt;0.01). Post-transplant eGFR was associated with age (≧65 years old, p&lt;0.01), aTKV, non-GS, and aTKV×non-GS (r=0.527, 0.344, 0.626 respectively, p&lt;0.05). The rate of eGFR decline was associated with age (≧65 years old, p=0.044), but not with aTKV and non-GS, aTKV×non-GS. Conclusion These results suggest that non-GS and age are correlated with post-transplant renal function but not pre-transplant renal function in living kidney donor, and the decline rate of eGFR are correlated with age.


2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (S3) ◽  
pp. S239-S239
Author(s):  
Yunmi Kim ◽  
Min Ji Kim ◽  
Jin Seok Jeon ◽  
Heungman Jun ◽  
Kyunghwan Jeong ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 916-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla S. Hanson ◽  
Jeremy R. Chapman ◽  
John S. Gill ◽  
John Kanellis ◽  
Germaine Wong ◽  
...  

Background and objectivesLiving kidney donor candidates accept a range of risks and benefits when they decide to proceed with nephrectomy. Informed consent around this decision assumes they receive reliable data about outcomes they regard as critical to their decision making. We identified the outcomes most important to living kidney donors and described the reasons for their choices.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsPrevious donors were purposively sampled from three transplant units in Australia (Sydney and Melbourne) and Canada (Vancouver). In focus groups using the nominal group technique, participants identified outcomes of donation, ranked them in order of importance, and discussed the reasons for their preferences. An importance score was calculated for each outcome. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically.ResultsAcross 14 groups, 123 donors aged 27–78 years identified 35 outcomes. Across all participants, the ten highest ranked outcomes were kidney function (importance=0.40, scale 0–1), time to recovery (0.27), surgical complications (0.24), effect on family (0.22), donor-recipient relationship (0.21), life satisfaction (0.18), lifestyle restrictions (0.18), kidney failure (0.14), mortality (0.13), and acute pain/discomfort (0.12). Kidney function and kidney failure were more important to Canadian participants, compared with Australian donors. The themes identified included worthwhile sacrifice, insignificance of risks and harms, confidence and empowerment, unfulfilled expectations, and heightened susceptibility.ConclusionsLiving kidney donors prioritized a range of outcomes, with the most important being kidney health and the surgical, lifestyle, functional, and psychosocial effects of donation. Donors also valued improvements to their family life and donor-recipient relationship. There were clear regional differences in the rankings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document