A Preliminary Examination of Situation Awareness and Pilot Performance in a Synthetic Vision Environment

Author(s):  
Julie M. Stark ◽  
J. Raymond Comstock ◽  
Lance J. Prinzel ◽  
Daniel W. Burdette ◽  
Mark W. Scerbo
2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria L. Calhoun ◽  
Mark H. Draper ◽  
Michael F. Abernathy ◽  
Michael Patzek ◽  
Francisco Delgado

Author(s):  
Christopher D. Wickens ◽  
Angelia Sebok ◽  
Timothy Bagnall ◽  
Jill Kamienski

A two module computational model of situation awareness is presented. One module, characterizing stage 1 (noticing) SA is based on the SEEV model of selective attention in complex environments, and consists of components of Salience (capturing attention), Effort (inhibiting attention movement), Expectancy (for events along a channel) and Value (of attending those events). These are combined additively, and accurately predict visual scanning on the flight deck and in driving. The second module characterizing stage 2 (understanding) SA, results from the integration of noticed information, and its decay if unattended. We describe briefly the application and validation of the attention module to pilot scanning of the synthetic vision system display suite in aviation, and in more detail, the application to predicting differences in situation awareness supported by three formats of a wake vortex display, designed to alert aircraft pilots to dangers in the flight path ahead.


2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Hainley ◽  
Kevin R. Duda ◽  
Charles M. Oman ◽  
Alan Natapoff

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-69
Author(s):  
Amy Irwin ◽  
Nejc Sedlar ◽  
Oliver Hamlet

Abstract. The paper examines general aviation (GA) pilot risk perception and decision-making via an online vignette study. GA is a high-risk area of aviation with many GA accidents considered to be the result of pilot performance rather than mechanical failure. Pilots ( n = 101) were presented with 12 go/no-go take-off decision scenarios across four risk categories (compromised performance, environment, faulty equipment, missing equipment). Scenarios depicting a missing checklist, missing sunglasses, and stress were considered less risky than illness, a faulty airspeed indicator (ASI), and a broken seatbelt. Pilots weighed their take-off decisions against mitigating factors, protective measures, and flight parameters. Situation awareness training and a focus on pre-flight planning may help to enhance flight safety within this group.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Irwin ◽  
Nejc Sedlar ◽  
Oliver Hamlet

The paper examines General Aviation (GA) pilot risk perception and decision-making via an online vignette study. GA is a high-risk area of aviation with many GA accidents considered to be the result of pilot performance rather than mechanical failure. Pilots (n = 101) were presented with 12 go/no-go take-off decision scenarios across four risk categories (compromised performance, environment, faulty equipment, missing equipment). Scenarios depicting a missing checklist, missing sunglasses and stress were considered less risky than illness, a faulty airspeed indicator (ASI) and a broken seatbelt. Pilots weighed their take-off decisions against mitigating factors, protective measures and flight parameters. Situation awareness training and a focus on pre-flight planning may help to enhance flight safety within this group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document