SODAR STUDIES OF THE MONSOON TROUGH BOUNDARY LAYER AT JODHPUR (INDIA)

A monostatic sodar was set up at Jodhpur, the extreme end of the monsoon trot*, to study the thermal boundary layer up to a height of 700 m. This effort was a part of the co-ordinated multi institutional project to study the monsoon dynamics. The usual structures of thermal plumes, ground based stable layers, elevated/multi- layers with or without undulations and dot echoes were seen. However, erosion of the inversion layer normally observed in the morning in the form of a rising layer over land areas was absent all through the period of observation from June to August 1990. In the paper, a study of the observed data in relation to the rainfall activity has been made. A preliminary examination shows that sodar structures may provide addi• tional information, not available normally through the conventional meteorological tools.

Why Is The Hague Sitting on the Fence in Prosecuting Boko Haram Terrorism in Nigeria?

On 18 November, 2010 a preliminary examination of the situation in Nigeria was announced and for almost a decade, investigation has not yet begun. Ten potential cases have been identified, seven for Boko Haram and three for Nigerian Security Forces (NSF). This article investigates whether issues of complementarity and admissibility provide any legal barriers capable of withholding investigation; and whether granting national amnesty to Boko Haram can hinder investigation and prosecution by the International Criminal Court. It employs a qualitative methodological approach for investigation and evaluation regarding the issues discussed. It argues that the situation in Nigeria has met the entire legal framework for investigation and prosecution to proceed and that the arrest of Abubakar Shekau, Abu Musab AlBarnawi, and Abu Abdullahi Ibn Umar al-Barnawi, the Boko Haram leaders will weaken the group, and provide the needed external help and intervention desired to end the terrorism.

The courtroom as a built environment: On the usefulness of Amos Rapoport’s theoretical framework

Amos Rapoport is one of the pioneers of the studies on the relationship between people and their environments. At the same time, analyzing the built environment as a factor co-determining human interactions in the courtroom tends to be more and more popular in literature. Following this line, the paper aims to consider whether Rapoport’s theoretical framework (especially its part related to non-verbal communication through the environment) could be fruitfully applied to the study of the courtroom, especially to shed some light on the spatial, physical, or architectural aspects of the courtroom (which is treated as a particular environment). This paper offers a very initial, preliminary examination of the usefulness of Rapoport’s framework in reference to the courtroom interior. What needs to be stressed is that, rather than focusing on a given jurisdiction as a point of reference when elaborating on the usefulness of Rapoport’s framework, the authors try to examine its general applicability.

Fundamentals of Common Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge Building

The article discusses the general issues of creating a Common Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge (CDSSK) as a modern integrated structure focused on supporting the tasks of information support for science and education, popularizing and storing knowledge reflected in various digital objects. The tasks of the CDSSK are formulated, user groups are determined, the architecture of the space is considered. The CDSSK includes a set of subspaces related to various scientific fields. The unity of space is ensured by unified principles for constructing subspaces and ontological connections between their objects. Each subspace includes digital objects, metadata containing facts associated with objects, and subject ontologies that provide advanced searches and navigation through space. All information is reflected in the CDSSK according to the rules of the “Semantic Web”. The content of each subspace includes a core (time-tested reliable scientific results) and a superstructure - new scientific results that have passed preliminary examination article describes

Hate speech operationalization: a preliminary examination of hate speech indicators and their structure

Hate speech should be tackled and prosecuted based on how it is operationalized. However, the existing theoretical definitions of hate speech are not sufficiently fleshed out or easily operable. To overcome this inadequacy, and with the help of interdisciplinary experts, we propose an empirical definition of hate speech by providing a list of 10 hate speech indicators and the rationale behind them (the indicators refer to specific, observable, and measurable characteristics that offer a practical definition of hate speech). A preliminary exploratory examination of the structure of hate speech, with the focus on comments related to migrants (one of the most reported grounds of hate speech), revealed that two indicators in particular, denial of human rights and promoting violent behavior, occupy a central role in the network of indicators. Furthermore, we discuss the practical implications of the proposed hate speech indicators—especially (semi-)automatic detection using the latest natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) methods. Having a set of quantifiable indicators could benefit researchers, human right activists, educators, analysts, and regulators by providing them with a pragmatic approach to hate speech assessment and detection.