Quantifying the Precision of Biomechanical Calculations using Experimental Data

1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-317
Author(s):  
M. Tracy ◽  
E.N. Corlett

Biomechanical calculations are a useful tool to evaluate the severity of manual materials handling tasks. The exactness of the calculated forces depends on a number of factors. On one level is the precision of the inputs such as postural data and the force exerted by the operator. At another level is the exactitude of the biomechanical model itself. The effect of the imprecision of each factor upon the final result can be calculated so that on one hand, the range of values within which the final result is likely to fall is known, and on the other hand, the importance of each factor can be assessed, by comparing the standard deviation of one or more factors with the standard deviation of the result. Calculations of forces on the low back have been carried out in the laboratory using an optical scanner (CODA-3) to record posture on-line to a computer, as well as a handle equipped with strain gauges to record the force exerted. The program automatically carries out biomechanical calculations from these inputs. It takes into account the uncertainties on muscle lever arms and intra-abdominal pressure, using mean values for these and estimating the confidence limits within which the calculated low-back forces will lie, given the variance of one or more of the inputs.

Author(s):  
Gang Yang ◽  
Riley Splittstoesser ◽  
Gregory Knapik ◽  
David Trippany ◽  
Sahika Vatan Korkmaz ◽  
...  

Kneeling in a restricted posture during manual materials handling has been associated with increased risk of low back pain. Little is known about the effect of kneeling posture on spinal loads. The purpose of this study was to compare differences in spinal loading between kneeling and standing postures for lifting tasks. Twelve subjects asymmetrically lifted luggage of three weights to three heights from floor while kneeling. Three subjects also performed the same tasks from waist height while standing. An adapted free-dynamic EMG-assisted biomechanical model was used to calculate spinal loads. Statistical analysis showed that there was no difference in compression between kneeling and standing (p=0.9605), but kneeling resulted in increased anterior-posterior and lateral shear forces on the lumbar spine (p =0.0002 and p<0.0001, respectively). Spinal loading changes while kneeling in a restricted posture may increase the risk of low back injury and must be considered in ergonomic job design.


Author(s):  
Colleen Brents ◽  
Molly Hischke ◽  
Raoul Reiser ◽  
John Rosecrance

Craft brewing is a rapidly growing industry in the U.S. Most craft breweries are small businesses with few resources for robotic or other mechanical-assisted equipment, requiring work to be performed manually by employees. Craft brewery workers frequently handle stainless steel half-barrel kegs, which weigh between 13.5 kg (29.7 lbs.) empty and 72.8 kg (161.5 lbs.) full. Moving kegs may be associated with low back pain and even injury. In the present study, researchers performed a quantitative assessment of trunk postures using an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based kinematic measurement system while workers lifted kegs at a craft brewery. Results of this field-based study indicated that during keg handling, craft brewery workers exhibited awkward and non-neutral trunk postures. Based on the results of the posture data, design recommendations were identified to reduce the hazardous exposure for musculoskeletal disorders among craft brewery workers.


1986 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 146-150
Author(s):  
S.S. Asfour ◽  
A.M. Genaidy ◽  
T.M. Khalil ◽  
S. Muthuswamy

Author(s):  
Kevin Granata ◽  
Patrick Lee ◽  
Tim Franklin

Pushing and pulling tasks account for 20% of occupational low-back injury claims but few studies have investigated the neuromuscular control of the spine during these tasks. Primary torso muscle groups recruited during pushing tasks include the rectus abdominis and external obliques. However, theoretical analyses suggest that co-contraction of the paraspinal muscles is necessary to stabilize the spine during flexion exertions. A biomechanical model was implemented to estimate co-contraction and spinal load from measured surface EMG and trunk moment data recorded during trunk flexion and extension exertions. Results demonstrate that co-contraction during flexion exertions was approximately twice the value of co-contraction during extension. Co-contraction accounted for up to 47% of the total spinal load during flexion exertions and spinal load attributed to co-contraction was nearly 50% greater during flexion than during extension exertions despite similar levels of trunk moment. Results underscore the need to consider neuromuscular recruitment when evaluating biomechanical risks. Keywords: Spine; Co-contraction; Push; Manual Materials Handling; Biomechanics


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document