Time Banditry and Impression Management Behavior

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meagan E. Brock Baskin ◽  
Victoria McKee ◽  
M. Ronald Buckley
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2039-2058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda L. Berkelaar

This article proposes an empirically-grounded typology to describe how people approach online impression management across multiple digital sites given employers’ use of online information for personnel selection. Qualitative analysis revealed four primary online impression management types: acceptor, dissident, scrubber, and strategist. The four types are primarily differentiated based on people’s relatively fixed or relatively flexible implicit theories about information, technology, visibility, and identity, and whether people take passive, reactive, or active approaches to online impression management. Although research on implicit theories usually focuses on individual attributes, these findings highlight how people’s implicit theories about the context or field of communicative action work in combination to influence impression management behavior. This study suggests practical interventions to increase people’s agency and effectiveness in managing online information and provides foundations for future research on online impression, information management, and implicit theories.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy G. Wingate ◽  
Joshua S. Bourdage

Abstract. Research suggests that early impressions influence employment interview outcomes. A highly controlled experiment examined the effects of pre-interview qualifications information and early applicant impression management behavior on interviewers’ early impressions and, in turn, applicant outcomes. Mock interviewers ( N = 247) judged the same applicant with a poorer pre-interview qualification ranking to be a poorer performer, but also perceived the applicant to have faked (deceived) more, and considered the applicant less likeable, less competent, less dedicated, and more conceited. Early applicant impression management behavior did not consistently contribute to interviewers’ early impressions, or to perceptions and judgments. Overall, these findings suggest that early applicant information can affect interviewer cognitions and judgments through the formation of early impressions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute-Christine Klehe ◽  
Martin Kleinmann ◽  
Christiane Nieß ◽  
Jessica Grazi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document