Transaortic Endoclamp for Mitral Valve Operation through Right Minithoracotomy in 369 Patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 394-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald D. Glower ◽  
Bhargavi Desai
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Ascending Aorta ◽  
Intercostal Space ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Aortic Clamping ◽  
Mitral Valve Operation ◽  
Group A ◽  
Aortic Cannula ◽  
Group B ◽  
Valve Operation

Objective The effects and benefits of a transaortic endoclamp for mitral valve operation through right minithoracotomy have not been established. Methods The records were examined in 671 patients undergoing mitral valve operation using aortic cannulation through a 6-cm right minithoracotomy in the fourth intercostal space. The ascending aorta was cannulated with a 24-Fr cannula through a 12-mm port in the first intercostal space. The experience from 1998 to 2006 with aortic endoclamping (group A, N = 436) was compared with the experience from 2006 to 2009 with external aortic clamping (group B, N = 235). Aortic endoclamping was achieved with a 30 mL endoclamp introduced through the aortic cannula into the ascending aorta to provide aortic endoclamping, anterograde cardioplegia, and root venting. Percutaneous femoral venous cannulation was used. Results Group A and group B had similar demographics. Endoclamp availability (group A) resulted in significantly less fibrillatory arrest (no clamping) in 67 of 436 (15%) versus 104 of 235 (44%) patients in group B (P = 0.001). In patients with aortic clamping, endoclamp (group A) versus external clamp (group B) was not a determinant of clamp time or pump time. Hospital and late outcomes were not different between groups. No patient complications could be attributed to the endoclamp. Conclusions Aortic endoclamping requires no more clamp or pump time than external clamping and can provide a more bloodless field than ventricular fibrillation without obstructing hardware. Aortic endoclamping is a safe alternative for mitral surgery through right minithoracotomy.

Video-Assisted Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery External Aortic Clamp versus Endoclamp Techniques

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Loforte ◽  
Giampaolo Luzi ◽  
Andrea Montalto ◽  
Federico Ranocchi ◽  
Vincenzo Polizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Aortic Clamping ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery can be performed through different approaches. The aim of the study was to report our early results and compare the external transthoracic aortic clamping with the endoaortic balloon occlusion techniques according to our experience. Methods Between January 2000 and March 2010, 138 patients (103 women, aged 58.4 ± 10.2 years) underwent video-assisted mitral valve surgery through a right thoracotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted by femoral arterial and bicaval cannulation with active venous drainage and normothermia; cardioplegic arrest achieved with intermittent blood cardioplegia. In group A (93 patients, 68 women, aged 58.8 ± 7.8 years, 72 MV replacement, 21 MV repair), aortic clamping was achieved using the external transthoracic aortic clamp. In group B (45 patients, 35 women, aged 58.1 ± 11.4 years, 33 MV replacement, 12 MV repair), aortic clamping was achieved with endoaortic balloon occlusion. Results Intraoperative procedure-associated problems were experienced in one patient (0.7%) in group A (one conversion to sternotomy for pleural adhesions and bad exposure). At a mean follow-up of 36 ± 18 months, 135 patients (97.8%) were in New York Heart Association class I to II, with satisfactory echocardiographic follow-up. In group A, two patients had noncardiac-related deaths. No perioperative deaths were observed in both groups. There were four (2.8%) transient ischemic attacks and one (0.7%) peripheral ischemic event (group A) during the early postoperative period. Mitral valve repair patients had a 5-year freedom from reoperation of 100% in both groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding preoperative variables, such as age, sex, New York Heart Association class, and left ventricular ejection fraction (P ≥ 0.05). Postoperative levels of myocardial cytonecrosis enzymes (MB fraction, creatine kinase, and troponine I) as well as operative time, extracorporeal circulation, and aortic cross-clamping times or ventilation and intensive care unit times were not significantly different between the two groups (P ≥ 0.05). More microembolic events were observed in group A than in group B (total 143.4 ± 30.6 per patient vs 78.9 ± 28.6 per patient) by means of continuous automated intraoperative transcranial Doppler evaluations (P < 0.05) applied to part of population. Conclusions Both techniques proved safe and comparable with low risk of morbidity and mortality. Patients undergoing endoclamp technique resulted to be less subject to embolism.

Abstract 15277: Monitoring Progression of Aneurysms of the Ascending Aorta: Timing, Cost and Radiation Exposure

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E Callow ◽  
Jordan Long ◽  
Sahar Rehman ◽  
Isna H Khaliq ◽  
Sebastian Boland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Cardiac Imaging ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Ascending Aorta ◽  
Medicare Reimbursement ◽  
Serial Imaging ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Current guidelines of the American Heart Association (AHA) recommend annual serial imaging for patients with aneurysm of the ascending aorta (AscAoA). However, recent data (Park K-H et al. Eur J CT Surg 2017;51:959-64) have suggested that this imaging frequency may not be necessary. This study was designed to compare the progression in growth rates of AscAoA using cardiac MRI (CMR) in 2 large cohorts of patients reassessed every 1 year and every 2 years. Methods: An institutional cardiac imaging database was queried for all patients with AscAoA, defined as a maximum ascending aorta diameter > 3.5 cm measured perpendicular to flow using CMR. The study cohort was divided into two groups; patients who had a follow up CMR every 1 (Group A), and those who had a CMR every 2 years (Group B). AscAoA growth rates were computed for each group and statistically compared using a two-sample t-test. For analysis of cost to the healthcare system, Medicare reimbursement rates for 2019 were utilized. Published mean radiation dose for cardiac CT (CCT) was utilized to assess radiation exposure. Results: Of 6,210 patients in the cardiac imaging database, 1,849 had a diagnosis of AscAoA, of which 941 had serial CMR studies. Of these 941 patients, 342 had a follow up CMR every 1 year, while 206 had a follow up CMR every 2-years. The mean progression of AscAoA was 0.0247 ± 0.475 cm for Group A and 0.0598 ± 0.209 cm for Group B. The growth rate of AscAoA was not significantly different between groups (p=0.236). The Medicare reimbursement for CMR was $23,056 per 100 patients (CPT 75557) without radiation exposure. If CCT had been used for these patients, Medicare reimbursement would have been $20,174 per 100 patients (CPT 75572) with exposure to 10.5 mSv of radiation per study. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in progression of AscAoA diameter between Groups A and B. These data suggest that serial imaging of AscAoA every 2 years may be appropriate, with reduced cost to the healthcare system and cumulative radiation exposure. Although CMR is slightly more costly than CCT, it eliminates cumulative breast radiation exposure, a feature of particular importance for female patients.

Left ventricular function after mitral valve operation in congenital mitral regurgitation

2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 737
Author(s):  
Young Min Eun ◽  
Jae Young Choi ◽  
Jong Kyun Lee ◽  
Jun Hee Sul ◽  
Seung Kyu Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Left Ventricular Function ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Mitral Valve Operation ◽  
Congenital Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Valve Operation

scholarly journals Video-assisted Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery versus Conventional Mitral Surgery in Rheumatic Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Badawy ◽  
Mohamed Alaa Nady ◽  
Mohamed Ahmed Khalil Salama Ayyad ◽  
Ahmed Elminshawy
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Mitral Valve Replacement ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery became an attractive option because of its cosmetic advantages over the conventional approach. The superiority of the minimally invasive approach regarding other aspects is still debatable. The aim of our study was to determine the potential benefits of minimally invasive mitral valve replacement with intraoperative video assistance over conventional surgery. Methods: This is a single-center prospective cohort study that included 60 patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent mitral valve replacement. Patients were divided into two groups: group (A) included patients who had conventional sternotomy (n= 30), and group (B) included patients who had video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve replacement (n= 30). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between both groups. Results: Mortality occurred in one patient in the group (A). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 118.93 ± 29.84 minutes vs. 64.73 ± 19.16 minutes in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001), and ischemic time was 102.27 ± 30.03 minutes vs. 53.67± 18.46 minutes in group B and A respectively (P < 0.001). Ventilation time was 2.77± 2.27 vs. 6.28 ± 4.48 hours in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001) and blood transfusion was 0.50 ± 0.63 vs. 2.83 ± 1.34 units in group B and A respectively (p< 0.001).  ICU stay was 1.73 ± 0.64 days in the group (B) vs. 4.47 ± 0.94 days in group A (p< 0.001). Postoperative bleeding was 353.33 ± 146.77 ml in the group (B) vs. 841.67 ± 302.03 ml in group A (p <0.001). No conversion to full sternotomy was reported in group B. In group (B), two cases (6.6%) required re-exploration for bleeding vs. four cases (13.2%) in group (A) (p=0.67). The hospital stay was 6.13 ± 1.59 days in the group (B) vs. 13.27 ± 7.62 days in group A (p< 0.001). Four cases (13.3%) developed mediastinitis in group A and in the group (B), there was one case of acute right lower limb embolic ischemia. Conclusion: Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral operations could be a safe alternative to conventional sternotomy with the potential of lesser morbidity and earlier hospital discharge.

Enoximone, a post-operative inodilator in patients following mitral valve operation: a prospective and controlled study

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hausen ◽  
H. von der Leyen ◽  
J. Vogelpohl ◽  
Ch. Dresler ◽  
B. Heublein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Mitral Valve Operation ◽  
Valve Operation

scholarly journals Standardized subannular repair for type IIIb functional mitral regurgitation in a minimally invasive mitral valve surgery setting†

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Pausch ◽  
Eva Harmel ◽  
Christoph Sinning ◽  
Hermann Reichenspurner ◽  
Evaldas Girdauskas
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Type Iiib ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract OBJECTIVES Subannular repair techniques in addition to undersized ring annuloplasty have been developed to address high mitral regurgitation (MR) recurrence rates after mitral valve repair in type IIIb MR. We compared the results of annuloplasty with simultaneous standardized subannular repair versus isolated annuloplasty, focusing on the periprocedural outcomes of minimally invasive procedures. METHODS A consecutive series of 108 patients with type IIIb functional MR with severe signs of bileaflet tethering underwent an annuloplasty + subannular repair (group A; n = 60) versus isolated annuloplasty (group B; n = 48). The primary end point of this prospective, parallel cohort study was death or recurrent MR >2, 1 year postoperatively. The secondary end points were survival and clinical outcomes, with special regard for the minimally invasively treated subgroups. RESULTS Duration of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time were comparable between both study groups. Procedural outcomes as well as echocardiographic outcome parameters were similar and independent of access (fully endoscopic versus full sternotomy). At the 12-month follow-up, death or MR >2 occurred in 3.3% (2/60) of patients in group A vs in 20.8% (10/48) of patients in group B (P = 0.037). The overall mortality rate during the follow-up period was 1.7% (1/60) in group A vs 12.5% (6/48) in group B (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Standardized realignment of papillary muscles is feasible and reproducible via a minimally invasive approach, resulting in excellent periprocedural outcomes, and has a clear potential to significantly decrease MR recurrence and improve 1-year outcomes compared to isolated annuloplasty.

scholarly journals Mitral valve re-repair vs replacement following failed initial repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muthu Veerappan ◽  
Prashasth Cheekoty ◽  
Faizus Sazzad ◽  
Theo Kofidis
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Operative Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Mitral Valve Operation ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies ◽  
Valve Operation

Abstract Background The optimal treatment strategy following a failed mitral valve repair remains unclear. This study aims to compare and analyse available studies which report the clinical outcomes post mitral valve re-repair (MVr) or replacement (MVR) after a prior mitral valve repair. Methods Based on PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was performed utilising PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases to identify retrospective cohort studies that reported outcomes of MVr and MVR after a prior mitral valve repair. Data regarding operative mortality, clinical outcomes and complications were extracted, synthesized and meta-analysed where appropriate. Results Eight studies with a total cohort of 1632 patients were used. After analysis, no significant differences in the short term and long-term operative mortality, incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure, Grade 1 and Grade 2 mitral regurgitation, requirement of 3rd mitral valve operation and reoperation due bleeding were found between the two groups. However, a slightly higher incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR: 0.11, CI: 0.02 to 0.17, I2 = 0%, p = 0.02) was observed in the MVR group, as compared to the MVr group. Conclusion MVr appears to be a viable alternative to MVR for mitral valve reoperation, given that they are associated with similar post-operative outcomes.

scholarly journals Mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis: Kobe experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 384-389
Author(s):  
Yukikatsu Okada ◽  
Takeo Nakai ◽  
Takashi Muro ◽  
Hisato Ito ◽  
Yu Shomura
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Pericardium ◽  
Ring Annuloplasty ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives We retrospectively analyzed our experience of mitral valve repair for native mitral valve endocarditis in a single institution. Methods From January 1991 to October 2011, 171 consecutive patients underwent surgery for infective endocarditis. Of these, 147 (86%) had mitral valve repair. At the time of surgery, 98 patients had healed (group A) and 49 had active infective endocarditis (group B). Repair procedures included resection of all infected tissue and thick restricted post-infection tissue, leaflet and annulus reconstruction with treated autologous pericardium, chordal reconstruction with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures, and ring annuloplasty if necessary. Fifty-two (35%) patients required concomitant procedures. The study endpoints were overall survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from valve-related events. The median follow-up was 78 months. Results There was one hospital death (hospital mortality 0.7%). Survival at 10 years was 88.5% ± 3.5% with no significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.052). Early reoperation was required in 4 patients in group B due to persistent infection or procedure failure. Freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 99% ± 1.0% in group A and 89.6 ± 4.0% in group B ( p = 0.024). Event-free survival at 10 years was 79.3% ± 4.8% (group A: 83.4% ± 5.9%, group B: 72.6% ± 6.9%, p = 0.010). Conclusions Mitral valve repair was highly successful using autologous pericardium, chordal reconstruction, and ring annuloplasty if required. Long-term results were acceptable in terms survival, freedom from reoperation, and event-free survival. Mitral valve repair is recommended for mitral infective endocarditis in most patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document