In This Issue: Pacific Worldviews to Frame Mixed Methods Research, Advances in Integration, and a Novel Venn Diagram Joint Display

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Michael D. Fetters ◽  
José F. Molina-Azorin
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Venn Diagram

A Vignette-Based Transformative Multiphase Mixed Methods Interventional Study Featuring Venn Diagram Joint Displays: Financial Education With Hong Kong Early Adolescent Ethnic Minority Students

2021 ◽  
pp. 155868982198983
Author(s):  
Hua Loon Ling ◽  
Ming Fai Pang
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Ethnic Minority ◽  
Minority Students ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Financial Education ◽  
Early Adolescent ◽  
Venn Diagram ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Ethnic Minority Students

Despite great interest in the transformative mixed methods, an example of using vignettes in a multiphase mixed methods interventional study has been lacking. This study investigates the social justice problem of poverty in the context of financial education with Hong Kong early adolescent ethnic minority students. The discussion contributes to the field of mixed methods research by demonstrating the use of a vignette-based methodology as a tool for integration, representation, and utilization of participant voices in a multiphase design. The use of joint displays in the form of Venn diagrams illustrates how interdisciplinary research findings that may reveal multiple aspects of noncohering phenomena can be interpreted through simultaneous visualization of integration and diffraction.

A Theoretical Framework for Mixed Methods Research with Canadian Families Living with Low Income

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Ginn ◽  
◽  
Karen Benzies ◽  
Leslie-Anne Keown ◽  
Shelley Raffin Bouchal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Theoretical Framework

Planning and Conducting a Large-Scale Mixed Methods Research Study: Research Team Experiences and Recommendations

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 283-295
Author(s):  
Katrin Niglas ◽  
◽  
Meril Ümarik ◽  
Maarja Tinn ◽  
Ivor Goodson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Research Team ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Study Research

Crowdsourcing Memories: Mixed Methods Research by Cultural Insiders-Epistemological Outsiders

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Khanna ◽  
Karim R. Lakhani ◽  
Shubhangi Bhadada ◽  
Nabil Khan ◽  
Saba Kohli Davé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research

Change, Challenges, and Mixed Methods

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeasik Cho
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Evaluation Strategy ◽  
Validity Criteria ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
The Way

This chapter discusses three ongoing issues related to the evaluation of qualitative research. First, the chapter considers whether a set of evaluation criteria is either determinative or changeable. Due to the evolving nature of qualitative research, it is likely that the way in which qualitative research is evaluated can change—not all at once, but gradually. Second, qualitative research has been criticized by newly resurrected positivists whose definitions of scientific research and evaluation criteria are narrow. “Politics of evidence” and a recent big-tent evaluation strategy are examined. Last, this chapter analyzes how validity criteria of qualitative research are incorporated into the evaluation of mixed methods research. The elements of qualitative research seem to be fairly represented but are largely treated as trivial. A criterion, the fit of research questions to design, is identified as distinctive in the review guide of the Journal of Mixed Methods Research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document