scholarly journals Comparison of Local-Only Anesthesia Versus Sedation in Patients Undergoing Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Trial

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrhett G. Via ◽  
Andrew R. Esterle ◽  
Hisham M. Awan ◽  
Sonu A. Jain ◽  
Kanu S. Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Hand Laterality ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
High Satisfaction ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Second Procedure ◽  
Wide Awake

Purpose: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common disease treated operatively. During the operation, the patient may be wide-awake or sedated. The current literature has only compared separate cohorts. We sought to compare patient experience with both local-only anesthesia and sedation. Methods: Staged bilateral carpal tunnel release utilizing open or endoscopic technique was scheduled and followed through to completion of per-protocol analysis in 31 patients. Patients chose initial hand laterality and were randomized regarding initial anesthesia method: local-only or sedation. Data collection via questionnaires began at consent and continued to 6 weeks postoperatively from second procedure. Primary outcome measures included patient satisfaction and patient anesthesia preference. Results: At final follow-up, 6 weeks postoperatively, high satisfaction (30 of 31 patients per method) was reported with both types of anesthesia. Among these patients, 17 (54%) preferred local-only anesthesia, 10 (34%) preferred sedation, 2 had no preference, and 2 opted out of response. Although anesthesia fees were approximately $390 lower with local-only anesthesia, total costs for carpal tunnel release were not significantly different with respect to the anesthesia cohorts. Total time in surgical facility was approximately 26 minutes quicker with local-only anesthesia, largely due to shorter time in the post-anesthesia care unit. Scaled comparison of worst postoperative pain following the 2 procedures revealed no difference between local-only anesthesia and sedation. Conclusions: Patients reported equal satisfaction scores with carpal tunnel release whether performed under local-only anesthesia or with sedation. In addition, local-only anesthesia was indicated as the preference of patients in 59% of cases.

scholarly journals Tourniquet Use in Wide-Awake Carpal Tunnel Release

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Sasor ◽  
Julia A. Cook ◽  
Stephen P. Duquette ◽  
Elizabeth A. Lucich ◽  
Adam C. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Without Tourniquet ◽  
Wide Awake

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common cause of upper extremity discomfort. Surgical release of the median nerve can be performed under general or local anesthetic, with or without a tourniquet. Wide-awake carpal tunnel release (CTR) (local anesthesia, no sedation) is gaining popularity. Tourniquet discomfort is a reported downside. This study reviews outcomes in wide-awake CTR and compares tourniquet versus no tourniquet use. Methods: Wide-awake, open CTRs performed from February 2013 to April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: with and without tourniquet. Demographics, comorbidities, tobacco use, operative time, estimated blood loss, complications and outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 304 CTRs were performed on 246 patients. The majority of patients were male (88.5%), and the mean age was 59.9 years. One hundred patients (32.9%) were diabetic, and 92 patients (30.2%) were taking antithrombotics. Seventy-five patients (24.7%) were smokers. A forearm tourniquet was used for 90 CTRs (29.6%). Mean operative time was 24.97 minutes with a tourniquet and 21.69 minutes without. Estimated blood loss was 3.16 mL with a tourniquet and 4.25 mL without. All other analyzed outcomes were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Operative time was statistically longer and estimated blood loss was statistically less with tourniquet use, but these findings are not clinically significant. This suggests that local anesthetic with epinephrine is a safe and effective alternative to tourniquet use in CTR. The overall rate of complications was low, and there were no major differences in postoperative outcomes between groups.

An Assessment of Sleep Disturbance in Patients before and after Carpal Tunnel Release

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 144-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Erickson ◽  
Daniel Polatsch ◽  
Steven Beldner ◽  
Eitan Melamed
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
English Speaking

Background: Night time numbness is a key characteristic of CTS and relief of night time symptoms is one of the outcomes most important to patients. This study tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference between sleep quality and night symptoms before and after carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods: Forty-four, English-speaking adult patients requesting open CTR for electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome completed questionnaires before and after surgery. Average age was 59, 24 patients were men and 20 were women. Patient with a primary or secondary sleep disorder were excluded. Before surgery, patients completed the Pittsburg Sleep Quality index (PSQI). At an average of 3 months after surgery, participants completed PSQI questionnaires. Onset of sleep quality improvement was specifically addressed. Differences between preoperative and postoperative sleep quality were evaluated using the paired t-test. Spearman correlations were used to assess the relationship between continuous variables. Results: Of the 44 patients, 32 (72%) were classified as poor sleepers (PSQI > 5.5) prior to surgery. At 3 months follow up, there was a significant improvement PSQI global scores (7.8 ± 5.1 vs 4 ± 3.5, p < 0.001) as well as subdivisions. Daytime dysfunction (0.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) and medication use (1.0 ± 1.2 vs 0.9 ± 1.2, p < 0.045) secondary to sleep disturbance and was improved as well. In all patients, onset of improvement was within 24 hours of surgery. Conclusions: CTR is associated with improvement in sleep quality at 3 months follow-up. CTR improves daytime dysfunction related to the sleep disturbance. The onset of sleep improvement is 24 hours after surgery in most cases.

scholarly journals Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Paulo Henrique Pires De Aguiar ◽  
Carlos Alexandre Martins Zicarelli ◽  
Fabio V. C. Sparapani ◽  
Pedro Augusto De Santana Jr ◽  
Alexandros Theodoros Panagoupolos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Motor Branch ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Open Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Nerve Entrapment Syndrome ◽  
Mini Open

Introduction: Median nerve compression is the most common nerve entrapment syndrome. After carpal tunnel release, patients often complain about the scar cosmetic appearance. Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome, surgical technique and complications of mini-open carpal release. Methods: We reviewed data from 48 surgical procedures for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in 32 patients at the Pinheiros Neurologicaland Neurosurgical Clinic in the period of 2000 and 2008. The mean age was 49 years-old. We used a 2 cm incision and microscopic technique to obtain meticulous access of the palmar hand anatomy with special attention to both the recurrent motor branch and palmar cutaneous nerve. Results: Twenty-two patients had total resolution of symptoms. Two patients had no change of neurological symptoms. During the follow up no infection or neurological deficits were observed. Conclusion: Mini-open is a safe and effective approach for carpal tunnel syndrome release. However detailed palmar hand anatomy is mandatory to prevent lesion of branching palmar nerve. The use of microscope is desirable to help identify important structures and avoid complications.

Comparison of short wrist transverse open and limited open techniques for carpal tunnel release: a randomized controlled trial of two incisions

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. J. Cho ◽  
J. H. Lee ◽  
D. J. Shin ◽  
K. H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare outcomes of limited open and short wrist transverse techniques in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. In a single centre randomized controlled trial, 84 patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomized before surgery to limited open or short wrist transverse open carpal tunnel release. The patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after surgery. At every follow-up, the Brigham and Women’s Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire scores, scar discomfort, and subjective patient satisfaction were evaluated. Two years after surgery, five patients were lost to follow-up. The groups had similar Brigham and Women’s Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity and Functional Status scores and subjective satisfaction scores. The incidence of scar discomfort was not significantly different between the two groups on serial postoperative follow-up. Short wrist transverse open release surgery showed similar early postoperative symptoms and subjective and functional outcomes to limited open release. Level of evidence: II

scholarly journals Open Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes: Performed Wide Awake versus with Sedation

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 074-079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayoung Kim ◽  
Jack Abboudi ◽  
Christopher Jones ◽  
Frederic Liss ◽  
William Kirkpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Syndrome Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Without Tourniquet ◽  
Open Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Wide Awake

Background Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is the most common surgery of the hand, and interest is growing in performing it under local anesthesia without tourniquet. To better understand differences, we hypothesized that patients undergoing CTR under wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) versus sedation (monitored anesthesia care [MAC]) would not result in a difference in outcome. Methods Consecutive cases of electrodiagnostically confirmed open CTR across multiple surgeons at a single center were prospectively enrolled. Data included demographic data, visual analog scale, Levine-Katz carpal tunnel syndrome scale, QuickDASH questionnaire, customized Likert questionnaire, and complications. Results There were 81 patients enrolled in the WALANT group and 149 patients in the MAC group. There were no reoperations in either group or any epinephrine-related complications in the WALANT group. Disability and symptom scores did not differ significantly between WALANT and sedation groups at 2 weeks or 3 months. Average postoperative QuickDASH, Levine-Katz, and VAS pain scales were the same in both groups. Both groups of patients reported high levels of satisfaction at 91 versus 96% for the WALANT versus MAC groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Patients in each group were likely to request similar anesthesia if they were to undergo surgery again. Conclusion Patients undergoing open CTR experienced similar levels of satisfaction and outcomes with either the WALANT or MAC techniques. There was no statistically significant difference between either group relative to the tested outcome measures. These data should facilitate surgeons and patients' choosing freely between WALANT and MAC techniques relative to complications and outcomes.

scholarly journals Trigger Fingers After Open Carpal Tunnel Release

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 192-195
Author(s):  
Duffield Ashmead ◽  
Haruko Okada ◽  
Jonathan Macknin ◽  
Steven Vander Naalt ◽  
Ilene Staff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Trigger Thumb ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Surgery ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Compensation Status ◽  
Open Carpal Tunnel Release

Trigger finger (TF) and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are common conditions often occurring together with an unclear relationship. While some studies conclude that TFs occur as a result of carpal tunnel release (CTR), others have not established a causal relationship. Our purpose was to evaluate the prevalence and timing of TF development in the same hand after open CTR in our population. This was a retrospective review of 497 patients undergoing open CTR by a single surgeon. Two hundred twenty-nine charts were analysed for age, gender, handedness, BMI, workers’ compensation status, and background disease. We analysed the specific digit involved and timing to development of triggering after CTR. Thirty-one patients developed triggering after CTR (13.5%). Mean age was 52.5 (14.0) years. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 53 months with a median follow-up of 6 months (interquartile range = 2-13). The thumb was the most common to trigger (42.22%), followed by the ring 24.44%, middle 22.22%, little 8.89%, and index fingers 2.22%. Trigger thumb occurred at 3.5 months (3.6) post-operatively, while other digits triggered at 7.5 months (4-10.25) after surgery ( P = .022). No risk factors were associated with TF development. Our results suggest that a trigger thumb develops more frequently and earlier than other trigger digits after an open CTR. Further study is needed to clarify the mechanisms involved and may enable specific treatment such as local anti-inflammatory medication following CTR. We suggest educating prospective carpal tunnel surgery patients to high risk of triggering following CTR.

scholarly journals Early Postoperative Improvement in Sleep and Pain After Carpal Tunnel Release

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Niedermeier ◽  
Robert J. Pettit ◽  
Travis L. Frantz ◽  
Kara Colvell ◽  
Hisham M. Awan
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Compressive Neuropathy ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Surgery ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
And Function

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. We sought to assess the subjective improvement in preoperative symptoms related to CTS, particularly those affecting sleep, and describe opioid consumption postoperatively. Methods: All patients undergoing primary carpal tunnel release (CTR) for electromyographically proven CTS were studied prospectively. All procedures were performed by hand surgery fellowship–trained adult orthopedic and plastic surgeons in the outpatient setting. Patients underwent either endoscopic or open CTR from June 2017 to December 2017. Outcomes assessed were pre- and postoperative Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), visual analog scale (VAS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores as well as postoperative pain control. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled. At 2 weeks, all showed significant ( P < .05) improvement in QuickDASH scores. At 6 weeks, 40 patients were available for follow-up. When compared with preoperative scores, QuickDASH (51 vs 24.5; P < .05), VAS (6.7 vs 2.9; P < .05), and PSQI (10.4 vs 6.4; P < .05) scores continued to improve when compared with preoperative scores. At 2-week follow-up, 39 patients responded to the question, “How soon after your carpal tunnel surgery did you notice an improvement in your sleep?” Seventeen patients (43.6%) reported they had improvement in sleep within 24 hours, 12 patients (30.8%) reported improvement between 2 and 3 days postoperatively, 8 patients (20.5%) reported improvement between 4 and 5 days postoperatively, and 2 patients (5.1%) reported improvement between 6 and 7 days postoperatively. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates rapid and sustained improvement in sleep quality and function following CTR.

Surgical Release of the Median Nerve under Local Anaesthesia for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-396
Author(s):  
M. ALTISSIMI ◽  
G. B. MANCINI
Keyword(s):  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Surgical Release

Carpal tunnel release was performed under local anaesthesia in 124 wrists of 108 patients. The local anaesthetic was injected into the carpal tunnel and into the subcutaneous tissue under the line of the skin incision. A tourniquet was used in all cases. Analgesia was complete in all but six patients. Only one patient had real difficulty in tolerating the tourniquet. In 18 cases the median nerve, when exposed at operation, showed evidence of some damage caused by the needle or by injection of local anaesthetic but, at follow-up, no symptoms or signs related to this damage were found.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document