scholarly journals Microsurgical clipping and endovascular flow diversion of ruptured anterior circulation blood blister-like aneurysms

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Hellstern ◽  
M Aguilar-Pérez ◽  
M AlMatter ◽  
P Bhogal ◽  
E Henkes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Microsurgical Clipping ◽  
Safety Margins

Background Detection and treatment of blister-like intracranial aneurysms as a source of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) can be challenging. In the past the results of both microsurgical and endovascular treatment were difficult. We present our experience with the treatment of blister-like aneurysms in the acute phase of SAH using microsurgical clipping, endovascular parent vessel occlusion or flow diversion. Methods A retrospective analysis of the cases of eight consecutive patients presenting in the acute phase after SAH from an intracranial blister aneurysm was performed. The demographic data of the patients, aneurysm characteristics, the clinical results of the treatment and the follow-up examinations were recorded. Procedural safety margins and aneurysm occlusion on follow-up digital subtraction angiography were the main interest of this evaluation. Results Between January 2012 and November 2017 a total of eight ruptured blister aneurysms were treated in our center, six patients endovascularly. Five patients were treated in the acute phase of SAH, four by flow diversion. All endovascular procedures were feasible and no procedure-related complications were observed, especially no recurrent hemorrhage. In the first angiographic follow-up all blood blister-like aneurysms were completely occluded; two of the six patients treated by flow diverter implantation showed mild, transient intimal hyperplasia without clinical symptoms or the need for treatment. Conclusions Endovascular flow diversion is a viable option in the acute phase after SAH due to the rupture of a blister aneurysm. Implants with reduced thrombogenicity, obviating dual-platelet function inhibition, and flow diverters for vessel bifurcations would extend the indications for this treatment modality.

scholarly journals Pipeline embolization device for recurrence of previously treated aneurysms

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Dornbos ◽  
Constantine L. Karras ◽  
Nicole Wenger ◽  
Blake Priddy ◽  
Patrick Youssef ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Diversion ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Endovascular Coiling ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Complete Occlusion ◽  
Microsurgical Clipping ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Angiographic Evidence

OBJECTIVEThe utilization of the Pipeline embolization device (PED) has increased significantly since its inception and original approval for use in large, broad-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. While microsurgical clipping and advances in endovascular techniques have improved overall efficacy in achieving complete occlusion, recurrences still occur, and the best modality for retreatment remains controversial. Despite its efficacy in this setting, the role of PED utilization in the setting of recurrent aneurysms has not yet been well defined. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of PED in the recurrence of previously treated aneurysms.METHODSThe authors reviewed a total of 13 cases in which patients underwent secondary placement of a PED for aneurysm recurrence following prior treatment with another modality. The PEDs were used to treat aneurysm recurrence or residual following endovascular coiling in 7 cases, flow diversion in 2, and microsurgical clipping in 4. The mean time between initial treatment and retreatment with a PED was 28.1 months, 12 months, and 88.7 months, respectively. Clinical outcomes, including complications and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and angiographic evidence of complete occlusion were tabulated for each treatment group.RESULTSAll PEDs were successfully placed without periprocedural complications. The rate of complete occlusion was 80% at 6 months after PED placement and 100% at 12 months in these patients who underwent PED placement following failed endovascular coiling; there were no adverse clinical sequelae at a mean follow-up of 26.1 months. In the 2 cases in which PEDs were placed for treatment of residual aneurysms following prior flow diversion, 1 patient demonstrated asymptomatic vessel occlusion at 6 months, and the other exhibited complete aneurysm occlusion at 12 months. In patients with aneurysm recurrence following prior microsurgical clipping, the rate of complete occlusion was 100% at 6 and 12 months, with no adverse sequelae noted at a mean clinical follow-up of 27.7 months.CONCLUSIONSThe treatment of recurrent aneurysms with the PED following previous endovascular coiling, flow diversion, or microsurgical clipping is associated with a high rate of complete occlusion and minimal morbidity.

Parent vessel occlusion after Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms of the anterior circulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 1333-1341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Potts ◽  
Maksim Shapiro ◽  
Daniel W. Zumofen ◽  
Eytan Raz ◽  
Erez Nossek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Complex Aneurysms ◽  
Aneurysm Size ◽  
Parent Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation Aneurysms

OBJECTIVEThe Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is now a well-established option for the treatment of giant or complex aneurysms, especially those arising from the anterior circulation. Considering the purpose of such treatment is to maintain patency of the parent vessel, postembolization occlusion of the parent artery can be regarded as an untoward outcome. Antiplatelet therapy in the posttreatment period is therefore required to minimize such events. Here, the authors present a series of patients with anterior circulation aneurysms treated with the PED who subsequently experienced parent vessel occlusion (PVO).METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of all anterior circulation aneurysms consecutively treated at a single institution with the PED through 2014, identifying those with PVO on follow-up imaging. Aneurysm size and location, number of PEDs used, and follow-up digital subtraction angiography results were recorded. When available, pre- and postembolization platelet function testing results were also recorded.RESULTSAmong 256 patients with anterior circulation aneurysms treated with the PED, the authors identified 8 who developed PVO after embolization. The mean aneurysm size in this cohort was 22.3 mm, and the number of PEDs used per case ranged from 2 to 10. Six patients were found to have asymptomatic PVO discovered incidentally on routine follow-up imaging between 6 months and 3 years postembolization, 3 of whom had documented “delayed” PVO with prior postembolization angiograms confirming aneurysm occlusion and a patent parent vessel at an earlier time. Two additional patients experienced symptomatic PVO, one of which was associated with early discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.CONCLUSIONSIn this large series of anterior circulation aneurysms, the authors report a low incidence of symptomatic PVO, complicating premature discontinuation of postembolization antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. Beyond the subacute period, asymptomatic PVO was more common, particularly among complex fusiform or very large–necked aneurysms, highlighting an important phenomenon with the use of PED for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms, and suggesting that extended periods of antiplatelet coverage may be required in select complex aneurysms.

scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in the Flow Diverter Era: Frequency of Use and Results in a Consecutive Series of 550 Treatments in a Single Centre

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem Jan van Rooij ◽  
Ratna S Bechan ◽  
Jo P. Peluso ◽  
Menno Sluzewski
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Permanent Neurological Deficit ◽  
Flow Diverters

Flow diverter devices became available in our department in 2009. We considered treatment with flow diverters only in patients with aneurysms not suitable for surgery or conventional endovascular techniques. This paper presents our preliminary experience with flow diverters in a consecutive series of 550 endovascular aneurysm treatments. Between January 2009 and July 2013, 550 endovascular treatments for intracranial aneurysms were performed. Of these, 490 were first-time aneurysm treatments in 464 patients and 61 were additional treatments of previously coiled aneurysms in 51 patients. Endovascular treatments consisted of selective coiling in 445 (80.8%), stent-assisted coiling in 68 (12.4%), balloon-assisted coiling in 13 (2.4%), parent vessel occlusion in 12 (2.2%) and flow diverter treatment in 12 (2.2%). Eleven patients with 12 aneurysms were treated with flow diverters. Two patients had ruptured dissecting aneurysms. One patient with a basilar trunk aneurysm died of acute in stent thrombosis and another patient died of brain stem ischaemia at 32 months follow-up. One patient had ischaemia with permanent neurological deficit. Two aneurysms are still open at up to 30 months follow-up. Flow diversion was used in 2% of all endovascular treatments. Both our own poor results and the high complication rates reported in the literature have converted our initial enthusiasm to apprehension and hesitancy. The safety and efficacy profile of flow diversion should discourage the use of these devices in aneurysms that can be treated with other techniques.

scholarly journals Flow diversion of tandem cerebral aneurysms: a multi-institutional retrospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al-Wala Awad ◽  
Karam Moon ◽  
Nam Yoon ◽  
Marcus D. Mazur ◽  
M. Yashar S. Kalani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Salt Lake ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Salt Lake City ◽  
Cerebral Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Single Session ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lake City

OBJECTIVEFlow diversion has proven to be an efficacious means of treating cerebral aneurysms that are refractory to other therapeutic means. Patients with tandem aneurysms treated with flow diversion have been included in larger, previously reported series; however, there are no dedicated reports on using this technique during a single session to treat this unique subset of patients. Therefore, the authors analyzed the outcomes of patients who had undergone single-session flow diversion for the treatment of tandem aneurysms.METHODSThe authors conducted a retrospective review of flow diversion with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) for the treatment of tandem aneurysms in a single session at 2 participating medical centers: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona. Patient demographic data, aneurysm characteristics, treatment strategy and results, complications, and follow-up data were collected from the medical record and analyzed.RESULTSBetween January 2011 and December 2015, 17 patients (12 female, 5 male) with a total of 38 aneurysms (mean size 4.7 ± 2.7 mm, mean ± SD) were treated. Sixteen patients had aneurysms in the anterior circulation, and 1 patient had tandem aneurysms in the posterior circulation. Twelve patients underwent only placement of a PED, whereas 5 underwent adjunctive coil embolization of at least 1 aneurysm. One PED was used in each of 9 patients, and 2 PEDs were required in each of 8 patients. There were 2 intraprocedural complications; however, in both instances, the patients were asymptomatic at the last follow-up. The follow-up imaging studies were available for 15 patients at a mean of 7 months after treatment (216 days, range 0–540 days). The mean initial Raymond score after treatment was 2.7 ± 0.7, and the mean final score was 1.3 ± 0.7.CONCLUSIONSIn this series, the use of flow diversion for the treatment of tandem cerebral aneurysms had an acceptable safety profile, indicating that it should be considered as an effective therapy for this complicated subset of patients. Further prospective studies must be performed before more definitive conclusions can be made.

Long-term Follow-up of In-stent Stenosis After Pipeline Flow Diversion Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

Neurosurgery ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 862-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seby John ◽  
Mark D. Bain ◽  
Ferdinand K. Hui ◽  
M. Shazam Hussain ◽  
Thomas J. Masaryk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intimal Hyperplasia ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Stent Occlusion ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Metallic Mesh ◽  
Stent Stenosis

Abstract BACKGROUND: There is scant information on in-stent stenosis after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence, severity, nature, and clinical consequences of in-stent stenosis on angiographic follow-up after treatment with the PED. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent aneurysm treatment with the PED was conducted. In-stent stenosis was assessed on subsequent follow-up angiography. Intimal hyperplasia was defined as a uniform growth process beyond the limits of the metallic mesh at <25%. In-stent stenosis represented an area of parent vessel narrowing, most often focal, graded as mild (25%-50%), moderate (50%-75%), or severe (>75%). RESULTS: Between June 2011 and April 2015, 80 patients were treated with the PED. Angiographic follow-up was available for 51 patients (representing 76% of available or 64% of all patients). Mean follow-up was 12.5 months. In-stent stenosis was detected in 5 patients (9.8%) at a median of 6 months. Stenosis was mild in 4 of 5 (80%) and moderate in 1 of 5 (20%) patients. There were no cases of severe stenosis. No stenosis caused flow limitation, clinical symptoms, or required re-treatment. Additional follow-up angiography was available in 2 of 5 stenosis patients showing marked improvement. Sixteen patients (31%) had intimal hyperplasia, and 28 patients (55%) had no stenosis. Asymptomatic stent occlusion occurred in 2 patients (4%) related to medication noncompliance. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the PED was associated with a 9.8% rate of in-stent stenosis, detected on first angiographic follow-up, at a median of 6 months. None were symptomatic or required re-treatment, and they showed significant improvement on follow-up.

scholarly journals Normative distribution of posterior circulation tissue time-to-maximum: Effects of anatomic variation, tracer kinetics, and implications for patient selection in posterior circulation ischemic stroke

2021 ◽  
pp. 0271678X2098239
Author(s):  
Adam E Goldman-Yassen ◽  
Matus Straka ◽  
Michael Uhouse ◽  
Seena Dehkharghani
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Arterial Input Function ◽  
Anatomic Variation ◽  
Input Function ◽  
Posterior Circulation ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Perfusion Time

The generalization of perfusion-based, anterior circulation large vessel occlusion selection criteria to posterior circulation stroke is not straightforward due to physiologic delay, which we posit produces physiologic prolongation of the posterior circulation perfusion time-to-maximum (Tmax). To assess normative Tmax distributions, patients undergoing CTA/CTP for suspected ischemic stroke between 1/2018-3/2019 were retrospectively identified. Subjects with any cerebrovascular stenoses, or with follow-up MRI or final clinical diagnosis of stroke were excluded. Posterior circulation anatomic variations were identified. CTP were processed in RAPID and segmented in a custom pipeline permitting manually-enforced arterial input function (AIF) and perfusion estimations constrained to pre-specified vascular territories. Seventy-one subjects (mean 64 ± 19 years) met inclusion. Median Tmax was significantly greater in the cerebellar hemispheres (right: 3.0 s, left: 2.9 s) and PCA territories (right: 2.9 s; left: 3.3 s) than in the anterior circulation (right: 2.4 s; left: 2.3 s, p < 0.001). Fetal PCA disposition eliminated ipsilateral PCA Tmax delays (p = 0.012). Median territorial Tmax was significantly lower with basilar versus any anterior circulation AIF for all vascular territories (p < 0.001). Significant baseline delays in posterior circulation Tmax are observed even without steno-occlusive disease and vary with anatomic variation and AIF selection. The potential for overestimation of at-risk volumes in the posterior circulation merits caution in future trials.

scholarly journals Flow diversion in the treatment of aneurysms: a randomized care trial and registry

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Raymond ◽  
Jean-Christophe Gentric ◽  
Tim E. Darsaut ◽  
Daniela Iancu ◽  
Miguel Chagnon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Safety Outcome ◽  
Standard Management ◽  
Efficacy Outcome ◽  
Parent Vessel Occlusion

OBJECTIVEThe Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm Trial (FIAT) was designed to guide the clinical use of flow diversion, an innovative method to treat intracranial aneurysms, within a care trial and to study safety and efficacy.METHODSFIAT, conducted in 3 Canadian hospitals, proposed randomized allocation to flow diversion or standard management options (observation, coil embolization, parent vessel occlusion, or clip placement), and a registry of non-randomized patients treated with flow diversion. The primary safety outcome was death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale score > 2) at 3 months, to be determined for all patients who received flow diversion at any time. The primary efficacy outcome was angiographic occlusion at 3–12 months combined with an independent clinical outcome.RESULTSOf 112 participating patients recruited between May 2, 2011, and February 25, 2015, 78 were randomized (39 in each arm), and 34 received flow diversion within the registry. The study was halted due to safety concerns. Twelve (16%) of 75 patients (95% CI 8.9%–26.7%) who were allocated to or received flow diversion at any time were dead (n = 8) or dependent (n = 4) at 3 months or more, crossing a predefined safety boundary. Death or dependency occurred in 5 (13.2%) of 38 patients randomly allocated and treated by flow diversion (95% CI 5.0%–28.9%) and in 5 (12.8%) of 39 patients allocated to standard treatment (95% CI 4.8%–28.2%). Efficacy was below expectations of the trial hypothesis: 16 (42.1%) of 38 patients (95% CI 26.7%–59.1%) randomly allocated to flow diversion failed to reach the primary outcome, as compared with 14 (35.9%) of 39 patients allocated to standard treatment (95% CI 21.7%–52.9%).CONCLUSIONSFlow diversion was not as safe and effective as hypothesized. More randomized trials are needed to determine the role of flow diversion in the management of aneurysms.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01349582 (clinicaltrials.gov)

scholarly journals Endovascular treatment of intracranial ‘blister’ and dissecting aneurysms

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 353-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius G Kaschner ◽  
Bastian Kraus ◽  
Athanasios Petridis ◽  
Bernd Turowski
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Parent Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Reconstruction ◽  
Dissecting Aneurysms

IntroductionBlister and dissecting aneurysms may have a different pathological background but they are commonly defined by instability of the vessel wall and bear a high risk of fatal rupture and rerupture. Lack of aneurysm sack makes treatment challenging.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of endovascular treatment of intracranial blister and dissecting aneurysms.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed all patients with ruptured and unruptured blister and dissecting aneurysms treated endovascularly between 2004–2018. Procedural details, complications, morbidity/mortality, clinical favourable outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) and aneurysm occlusion rates were assessed.ResultsThirty-four patients with endovascular treatment of 35 aneurysms (26 dissecting aneurysms and 9 blister aneurysms) were included. Five aneurysms were treated by parent vessel occlusion, and 30 aneurysms were treated by vessel reconstruction using stent monotherapy ( n = 9), stent-assisted coiling ( n = 7), flow diverting stents ( n = 13) and coiling + Onyx embolization ( n = 1). No aneurysm rebleeding and no procedure-related major complications or deaths occurred. There were five deaths in consequence of initial subarachnoid haemorrhage. Complete occlusion (79.2%) was detected in 19/24 aneurysms available for angiographic follow-up, and aneurysm recurrence in 2/24 (8.3%). The modified Rankin Scale ≤2 rate at mean follow-up of 15.1 months was 64.7%.ConclusionTreatment of blister and dissecting aneurysms developed from coil embolization to flow diversion with multiple stents to the usage of flow diverting stents. Results using modern flow diverting stents encourage us to effectively treat this aneurysm entity endovascularly by vessel reconstruction. Therefore, we recommend preference of vessel reconstructive techniques to parent vessel occlusion.

A2, M2, P2 aneurysms and beyond: results of treatment with pipeline embolization device in 65 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 903-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T Primiani ◽  
Zeguang Ren ◽  
Peter Kan ◽  
Ricardo Hanel ◽  
Vitor Mendes Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Cerebral Artery ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Vascular Pathology ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Rare Type ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Aneurysm Size

BackgroundIntracranial aneurysms located in the distal vessels are rare and remain a challenge to treat through surgical or endovascular interventions.ObjectiveTo describe a multicenter approach with flow diversion using the pipeline embolization device (PED) for treatment of distal intracranial aneurysms.MethodsCases of distal intracranial aneurysms defined as starting on or beyond the A2 anterior cerebral artery, M2 middle cerebral artery, and P2 posterior cerebral artery segments were included in the final analysis.Results65 patients with distal aneurysms treated with the PED were analyzed. Median aneurysm size at the largest diameter was 7.0 mm, 60% were of a saccular morphology, and 9/65 (13.8%) patients presented in the setting of acute rupture. Angiographic follow-up data were available for 53 patients, with a median follow-up time of 6 months: 44/53 (83%) aneurysms showed complete obliteration, 7/53 (13.2%) showed reduced filling, and 2/53 (3%) showed persistent filling. There was no association between patient characteristics, including aneurysm size (P=0.36), parent vessel diameter (P=0.27), location (P=0.81), morphology (P=0.63), ruptured status on admission (P=0.57), or evidence of angiographic occlusion at the end of the embolization procedure (P=0.49). Clinical outcome data were available for 60/65 patients: 95% (57/60) had good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) at 3 months.ConclusionsThis large multicenter study of patients with A2, M2, and P2 distal aneurysms treated with the PED showed that flow diversion may be an effective treatment approach for this rare type of vascular pathology. The procedural compilation rate of 7.7% indicates the need for further studies as the flow diversion technology constantly evolves.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document