Adherence to instruction for use after endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysm

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110073
Author(s):  
Axel Wrede ◽  
Leena Lehti ◽  
Jonas Peter Eiberg ◽  
Stefan Acosta
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Popliteal Artery ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Size Difference ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Popliteal Artery Aneurysm ◽  
One Year

Objectives Endovascular repair (ER) of popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is an alternative to open repair. However, there is no standardized protocol for when to opt for ER and the decision is therefore at the discretion of the clinician. This study aims to evaluate the adherence to the Instruction For Use (IFU) in patients undergoing ER for PAA and factors associated with stent graft patency at one year. Methods The adherence to IFU provided by the manufacturer in 55 patients treated with Gore Viabahn® Endoprosthesis with Heparin Bioactive Surface for PAA between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Duplex follow-up was performed at 30 days and one year. Results The two groups of patients treated within ( n = 10) and not within ( n = 45) IFU did not differ in patient demographics, diagnostic assessment, treatment or outcome. Forty-five patients (81.8%) received stent graft placement with at least one deviation according to IFU. Distal oversizing >20% was the most frequent deviation against IFU ( n = 22, 40.0%). Primary patency at one year was 72%. Diameter size difference >1 mm between overlapping stent grafts (6/14 [43%], p = 0.013) and renal insufficiency (5/12 [42%], p = 0.0086) were associated with lower primary patency at one year. Age-adjusted analysis of tortuosity index (HR 1.78/SD, 95% CI 1.17–2.71; p = 0.0071) and maximal PAA angle (HR 1.73/SD, 95% CI 1.018–2.95; p = 0.043) were associated with major amputation/mortality at end of follow-up. Conclusion The majority of patients undergoing ER for PAA were not treated within IFU. Diameter size difference >1 mm between overlapping stent grafts was associated with a higher loss of primary patency at one year. Multi-center studies with larger sample size and long-term follow up of patency are warranted.

A Matched Case-Control Study on Open and Endovascular Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms

2018 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Dorigo ◽  
A. Fargion ◽  
F. Masciello ◽  
G. Piffaretti ◽  
G. Pratesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Popliteal Artery ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Popliteal Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Matched Case ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Matched Case Control Study ◽  
Control Study

Objective: To compare early and late results of open and endovascular management of popliteal artery aneurysm in a retrospective single-center matched case-control study Methods: From 1981 to 2015, 309 consecutive interventions for popliteal artery aneurysm were performed in our institution, in 59 cases with endovascular repair and in 250 cases with open repair. Endovascular repair was preferred in older asymptomatic patients, while open repair was offered more frequently to patients with a thrombosed popliteal artery aneurysm and a poor run-off status. A one-to-one coarsened exact matching on the basis of the baseline demographic, clinical, and anatomical covariates significantly different between the two treatment options was performed and two equivalent groups of 56 endovascular repairs and open repairs were generated. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative results with χ2 test and of follow-up outcomes with the Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test. Results: There were no differences between the two groups in terms of perioperative outcomes. Median duration of follow-up was 38 months. Five-year survival rates were 94% in endovascular repair group and 89.5% in open repair group (p = 0.4, log-rank 0.6). Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 78%, and 72% in endovascular repair group and 82.5%, 80%, and 64% in open repair group (p = 0.8, log-rank 0.01). Freedom from reintervention at 5 years was 65.5% in endovascular repair group and 76% in open repair group (p = 0.2, log-rank 1.2). Secondary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94%, 86%, and 74% in endovascular repair group, and 94%, 89%, and 71% in open repair group, respectively (p = 0.9, log-rank 0.01). The rates of limb preservation at 5 years were 94% in endovascular repair group and 86.4% in open repair group (p = 0.3, log-rank 0.8). Conclusion: Open repair and endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms provided in this retrospective single-center experience similar perioperative and follow-up results in equivalent groups of patients.

scholarly journals Successful Endovascular Repair of a Ruptured Popliteal Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Duncan Muir ◽  
Sachin R. Kulkarni
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Popliteal Artery ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Popliteal Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Ct Angiogram ◽  
Endovascular Approach

Introduction. It is rare for a popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) to present with rupture. This case reports a longer-term success in the management of a large ruptured popliteal artery aneurysm with an endovascular approach, with a literature review of management of such cases. Case Report. An 80-year-old man presented to the accident and emergency department with pain and swelling behind the left knee and at the back of the thigh. An ultrasound scan and subsequent CT angiogram revealed a large 9.4 cm ruptured PAA. The patient had significant comorbidities deeming him unfit for a major surgical intervention of drainage of haematoma and exclusion bypass. Therefore, he underwent urgent endovascular treatment of the ruptured PAA with a covered stent graft. A follow-up duplex scan at 1 year showed a patent stent with no evidence of endoleak, and the patient remained asymptomatic. A clinical follow-up at 18- and 24-month postprocedure showed a patent stent graft and complete resolution of haematoma. Conclusion. Whilst open repair with exclusion bypass may still be a treatment of choice, an endovascular approach is both safe and effective in the management of a ruptured PAA in an unfit patient with an acceptable longer-term outcome.

Aortic endograft and bridging stent-graft remodeling after branched endovascular aortic repair

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812098369
Author(s):  
Stefano Fazzini ◽  
Giovanni Torsello ◽  
Martin Austermann ◽  
Efthymios Beropoulis ◽  
Roberta Munaò ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Instability Rate ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Objectives The results of branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms are mainly dependent on durability of the graft used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative aortic main body and bridging stent-graft remodeling, and their impact on bridging stent-graft instability at one year. Methods Computed tomoangiographies of 43 patients (43 aortic main body mated with 171 bridging stent-grafts) were analyzed before and after branched endovascular repair as well as after a follow-up of 12 months. Primary endpoint was aortic main body remodeling (migration >5 mm, shortening >5 mm, scoliosis >5° or lordosis >5°). Shortening was defined as a reduced length in the long axis, scoliosis as left-right curvature, and lordosis as antero-posterior curvature. Aortic main body remodeling, aneurysm sac changes, and bridging stent-graft tortuosity were evaluated to study their correlations and the impact on the bridging stent-graft instability. Results At 12 months, aortic main body remodeling was observed in 72% of the cases, migration in 39.5% (mean 5.21 mm), shortening in 41.9% (mean 5.79 mm), scoliosis in 58.1%, (mean 10.10°), lordosis in 44.2% (mean 5.78°). Migration, shortening, and scoliosis were more frequent in patients with larger aneurysms ( p = .005), while scoliosis was significantly more frequent in type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm ( p = .019). Aortic main body remodeling was significantly associated to bridging stent-graft remodeling (r: 0.3–0.48). The bridging stent-graft instability rate was 9.3%. Despite a trend toward significance ( p = .07), none of the evaluated aortic main body and bridging stent-graft changes were associated with bridging stent-graft instability at 12 months. Conclusions Aortic main body remodeling is frequent especially in large and extended thoracoabdominal aneurysm aneurysms. Aortic main body and bridging stent-graft remodeling was significantly correlated. While these geometric changes had no significant impact on bridging stent-graft instability at one year, a close long-term follow-up after branched endovascular repair could predict bridging stent-graft failures.

One-year outcomes of the BeGraft stent graft used as chimney graft in conjunction with the Endurant device for the treatment of complex abdominal diseases

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergana T Taneva ◽  
Marco V Usai ◽  
Georgios A Pitoulias ◽  
Giovanni Torsello ◽  
Martin Austermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Group A ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Chimney Graft

Aim To evaluate the performance of two different flexible devices, the balloon-expandable BeGraft stent as on-label chEVAR use with the Endurant (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, USA) stent graft compared to the self-expandable off-label employment of Viabahn (Gore Flagstaff, Arizona, USA). Methods All patients treated for pararenal aortic pathologies between 2008 and 2017 using Endurant II (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) abdominal endograft in combination with Viabahn (Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) or BeGraft (Bentley, Hechingen, Germany) at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the employed chimney graft, namely Viabahn (group A) and BeGraft (group B). The primary endpoint was the incidence of type IA endoleak at one month and last follow-up. Secondary endpoints included reintervention rates, primary patency of the chimney graft, and need for additional placement of bare metal stents also known as relining. Results A total of 27 patients (mean age: 76 years) were treated with overall 47 chimney grafts. In particular, 11 patients received 21 Viabahn and 16 patients underwent placement of 26 BeGraft stents. Mean follow-up was 14.3 ± 9.0 months for group A and 13.0 ± 13.7 for group B, p = .451. The mean chimney graft length was 85.1 ± 38.9 mm for group A and 34.9 ± 9.8mm for group B ( p < .001). The oversizing rate at the proximal sealing zone was significantly higher in group B (Group A: 23.1 ± 16.5% vs. Group B: 33.6 ± 7.6%, p = .007). The primary patency rates were similar between groups ( p = .250). The subgroup analysis showed a significantly higher early (9–42.9% vs. 2–7.7%, p = .005) and at last CT follow-up (5–23.8% vs. 0–0.0%, p = .011) type IA endoleak, higher primary relining (14–66.7% vs. 5–19.2%, p = .001) and reintervention rates (5–23.8% vs. 0–0.0%; p = .011) for group A chimney stent grafts. Conclusions Both chEVAR combinations displayed similar patency rate, showing the BeGraft-Endurant composition less need for relining and fewer one-year type IA endoleak and reintervention rates in the subgroup analysis.

Elective and Emergent Endovascular Treatment of Subclavian Artery Aneurysms and Injuries

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schoder ◽  
Manfred Cejna ◽  
Thomas Hölzenbein ◽  
Georg Bischof ◽  
Fritz Lomoschitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stent Graft ◽  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Graft Patency ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Luminal Narrowing

Purpose: To demonstrate our short and long-term results after transbrachial treatment of subclavian artery aneurysms and injuries with stent-grafts in elective and emergency settings. Methods: Ten of 12 consecutive patients (6 men; mean age 63.8 years, range 38–80) were treated electively with commercially prepared endografts delivered via a transbrachial access to repair a subclavian artery aneurysm (n = 3) or an injury from a misplaced central venous catheter (n = 7). Two patients required emergency treatment for a ruptured atherosclerotic aneurysm in one and an unintentional arterial puncture during placement of a central venous access in the other. Stent-graft patency during follow-up was assessed by physical examination with comparison of brachial blood pressures in all patients; computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in available patients. Results: Successful deployment of stent-grafts with sealing of the lesion was achieved in all cases. There were 2 (17%) procedural complications. One patient developed an access-site hematoma that required surgical revision. The second patient, who had a right subclavian injury, suffered an embolic cerebral infarction. The primary stent-graft patency during follow-up (mean 11.6 months) was 100%. CTA examinations in 7 patients at a mean 18 months showed strut dislocation at the thoracic outlet without luminal narrowing in 1 patient. A 50% intraluminal narrowing due to compression between the clavicle and the first rib occurred in another patient. Six patients with a mean follow-up of 23 months (range 0.3–4.5 years) are still alive with patent stent-grafts. Conclusions: Endovascular stent-graft treatment of subclavian artery aneurysms and injuries is a less invasive alternative to surgical repair. Long-term results must still be confirmed in further studies.

How to proceed with a patent popliteal artery aneurysm below the chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion?

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (8) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Artery ◽  
Superficial Femoral Artery ◽  
Popliteal Artery ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Mural Thrombus ◽  
Popliteal Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Femoral Artery Occlusion ◽  
Aneurysm Thrombosis

Introduction: The indications for popliteal artery aneurysm treatment are clear. In aneurysms with patent inflow and outflow arteries, the risk of peripheral embolisation from a mural thrombus is high and the treatment, mostly a vascular intervention, is focused on preventing this extremity- threatening complication. It is unclear, however, how high the risk of peripheral embolisation is and how to proceed with a patent popliteal artery aneurysm fed by the deep femoral artery when the superficial femoral artery is chronically occluded. Methods: All patients diagnosed with popliteal artery aneurysm between 2015 and 2019 were searched in the database of the Department of Surgery II of University Hospital Olomouc. Patients with a patent popliteal artery aneurysm and chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion in the ipsilateral extremity were selected. Results: We diagnosed 66 patients with 85 popliteal artery aneurysms. Four patients had a patent popliteal artery aneurysm and chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion in the ipsilateral extremity. In these patients, conservative treatment was indicated after the diagnosis was determined. In three patients, no clinically obvious complication of the popliteal artery aneurysm occurred. In one patient, popliteal artery aneurysm thrombosis occurred after a follow-up of 21 months, leading to a shortening of his calf claudication distance and limiting the patient. Conclusion: Our experience with this small group of patients shows the possibility of primary conservative treatment in patients with a patent popliteal artery aneurysm below the chronic superficial femoral artery occlusion site. Aneurysm thrombosis can be expected during follow-up. Patients in whom the thrombosis leads to limitations are indicated for surgical intervention. The risk of peripheral embolisation from the mural thrombus cannot be excluded with certainty. Further studies involving large groups of patients are needed to provide a more precise recommendation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document