FDA-Catalyst—Using FDA’s Sentinel Initiative for large-scale pragmatic randomized trials: Approach and lessons learned during the planning phase of the first trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noelle M Cocoros ◽  
Sean D Pokorney ◽  
Kevin Haynes ◽  
Crystal Garcia ◽  
Hussein R Al-Khalidi ◽  
...  

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration’s Sentinel Initiative is well positioned to support pragmatic clinical trials. FDA-Catalyst combines direct contact with health plan members and/or providers with data in the Sentinel infrastructure. Here, we describe the rationale, feasibility analyses, and lessons learned from the planning phase of the first large pragmatic trial conducted using the Sentinel Initiative’s delivery system capabilities—IMplementation of a randomized controlled trial to imProve treatment with oral AntiCoagulanTs in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (the IMPACT-AFib trial). Methods: During the planning phase, we convened representatives from five commercial health plans, FDA, study coordinating centers, and a patient representative for protocol development, institutional review board preparation, and other activities. Administrative claims data from the plans were included in a retrospective cohort analysis to assess sample size for the trial. Members ≥30 years old with ≥365 days of medical/pharmacy coverage, ≥2 diagnosis codes for atrial fibrillation, a guideline-based indication for oral anticoagulant use for stroke prevention, and no evidence of oral anticoagulant use in the 365 days prior to the index atrial fibrillation diagnosis in 2013 were included. Exclusions for the analysis included other conditions requiring anticoagulation, history of intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleed. We calculated rates of oral anticoagulant use, transient ischemic attack or stroke, and bleeding in the 365 days following the index atrial fibrillation diagnosis. Results: A total of 44,786 members with atrial fibrillation with no evidence of recent oral anticoagulant use were identified. In total, 87% (n = 38,759) were classified as having a guideline-based indication for oral anticoagulants. Of those, 33% (n = 12,867) had a new oral anticoagulant dispensed during the following year, 15% (n = 5917) were hospitalized for stroke or transient ischemic attack, and 9% (n = 3469) for bleeding events. This information was used to develop the trial protocol including sample size, power calculations, and level of randomization. Conclusion: Sentinel infrastructure generated preliminary data that supported planning and implementation of a large pragmatic trial embedded in health plans. This planning identified unanticipated challenges that must be addressed in similar trials.

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoji Arihiro ◽  
Kenichi Todo ◽  
Masatoshi Koga ◽  
Eisuke Furui ◽  
Naoto Kinoshita ◽  
...  

Aims This study was performed to determine the short-term risk-benefit profiles of patients treated with oral anticoagulation for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack using a multicenter, prospective registry. Methods A total of 1137 patients (645 men, 77 ± 10 years old) with acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack taking warfarin (662 patients) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (dabigatran in 205, rivaroxaban in 245, apixaban in 25 patients) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who completed a three-month follow-up survey were studied. Choice of anticoagulants was not randomized. Primary outcome measures were stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. Results Both warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were initiated within four days after stroke/transient ischemic attack onset in the majority of cases. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users had lower ischemia- and bleeding-risk indices (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED) and milder strokes than warfarin users. The three-month cumulative rate of stroke/systemic embolism was 3.06% (95% CI 1.96%–4.74%) in warfarin users and 2.84% (1.65%–4.83%) in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users (adjusted HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.44–2.04). The rate of major bleeding was 2.61% (1.60%–4.22%) and 1.11% (0.14%–1.08%), respectively (HR 0.63, 0.19–1.78); that for intracranial hemorrhage was marginally significantly lower in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users (HR 0.17, 0.01–1.15). Major bleeding did not occur in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users with a CHADS2 score <4 or those with a discharge modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Conclusions Stroke or systemic embolism during the initial three-month anticoagulation period after stroke/transient ischemic attack was not frequent as compared to previous findings regardless of warfarin or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were used. Intracranial hemorrhage was relatively uncommon in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users, although treatment assignment was not randomized. Early initiation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants during the acute stage of stroke/transient ischemic attack in real-world clinical settings seems safe in bleeding-susceptible Japanese population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (04) ◽  
pp. 364-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Attena ◽  
Carmine Mazzone ◽  
Francesca Esposito ◽  
Valentina Parisi ◽  
Ciro Bancone ◽  
...  

AbstractThis is an observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with bioprosthetic valves or prior surgical valve repair in clinical practice. A total of 122 patients (mean age: 74.1 ± 13.2; 54 females) with bioprosthetic heart valve or surgical valve repair and AF treated with NOACs were included in the analysis. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 years, Diabetes mellitus, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack, Vascular disease) and HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INR [international normalized ratio], Elderly, Drugs or alcohol) score values were 3.6 ± 1.2 and 2.6 ± 1.4, respectively. Of the total study population, 28.6% was taking apixaban 5 mg twice daily (BID), 24.5% apixaban 2.5 mg BID, 18% dabigatran 150 mg BID, 13% dabigatran 110 mg BID, 9.8% rivaroxaban 20 mg daily (QD), and 5.7% rivaroxaban 15 mg QD. Also, 92% of the study population previously had warfarin replaced with NOACs due to lack compliance and labile INR control (time in therapeutic range < 60%). NOAC therapy for AF was started on average 934 ± 567 days after bioprosthetic heart valve implantation or surgical repair for an average duration of 835 ± 203 days. The study population included 24 (19.6%) patients with bioprosthetic mitral valve, 52 (43%) patients with bioprosthetic aortic valve, 41 (33.6%) patients with previous surgical mitral repair, 5 (4%) patients with previous surgical aortic repair, and concomitant use of NOACs. All patients were evaluated for thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism) as well as major bleeding events during the follow-up period. In our study population, we recorded a low mean annual incidence of thromboembolism (0.8%) and major bleeding (1.3%). According to our data, anticoagulation therapy with NOACs seems to be an effective and a safe treatment strategy for nonvalvular AF patients with bioprosthetic valves or prior surgical valve repair.


Author(s):  
Priyesh A Patel ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Gregg C Fonarow ◽  
Barbara L Lytle ◽  
Eric E Smith ◽  
...  

Background: The FDA recently approved the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran (DTI) and factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation (AF) stroke prophylaxis based on large randomized trials showing non-inferiority to warfarin for stroke prevention. However, real-world utilization patterns and predictors of use for these novel anticoagulants (NAC) remain poorly characterized. Methods: Using the AHA Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry, we analyzed patients with AF who were hospitalized for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and discharged on warfarin or NAC. The first NAC approved by the FDA was dabigatran in 10/2010, so we chose a 2-year study period from 10/2010-9/2012. We excluded patients with contraindications for anticoagulation. Patient and hospital variables associated with discharge anticoagulant use were evaluated using Pearson chi-square and Wilcoxon tests. Results: Of 61,655 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 6,835 (11.1%) were discharged on NAC, of which 86.7% were prescribed DTI. Warfarin was prescribed in 54,820 (88.9%) patients. For patients discharged on NAC vs. warfarin, 51.8% vs. 53.3% (p=0.016) were female and median age was 77 [IQR 69-84] vs. 79 [IQR 70-85] (p<0.001). The majority of patients discharged on NAC or warfarin were white (82.7% vs. 80.8% respectively, p=0.005). Slightly higher proportions of patients discharged on NAC vs. warfarin had private/HMO insurance (41.7% vs. 37.6%, p<0.001) than Medicare (39.0% vs. 42.3%, p<0.001). Patients discharged on NAC vs. warfarin had less severe ischemic stroke (NIH stroke scale=3 [IQR 1-8] vs. 5 [IQR 2-11], p<0.001), shorter length of stay (3 [IQR 2-5] vs. 4 [IQR 2-6] days, p<0.001), and higher proportions of patients who could ambulate at admission (32.5% vs. 26.1%, p<0.001) and discharge (47.5% vs. 39.2%, p<0.001). CHADS2 scores were lower among those discharged on NAC (Figure). More patients discharged on NAC were discharged to home (65.0%) than a healthcare facility, compared to 52.4% of patients prescribed warfarin being discharged to home (p<0.001). Conclusion: Among patients with AF and acute ischemic stroke or TIA discharged on oral anticoagulants, NAC use remains low and is prescribed to younger, more functional, and lower risk patients.


Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 3298-3304 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Ntaios ◽  
Vasileios Papavasileiou ◽  
Hans-Christoph Diener ◽  
Konstantinos Makaritsis ◽  
Patrik Michel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document