Predictors of reoperation after internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures

2020 ◽  
pp. 175857321989597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy S Somerson ◽  
Mark E Morrey ◽  
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo ◽  
Bernard F Morrey

Background Despite good reported outcomes with open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures, complication rates remain high. The objective of this work is to identify factors associated with reoperation. Methods Sixty-three patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation for intra-articular ( Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type C) distal humerus fractures between 2004 and 2010 were identified using an institutional trauma registry, 62 of which were followed for a minimum of six months. Age, gender, fracture subclassification, open fracture presence, Injury Severity Score, time to definitive surgery, length of postoperative immobilization, and type of approach were recorded. Multivariate analysis was utilized to identify factors independently associated with reoperation. Results Complications requiring reoperation developed in 25 (40.3%) elbows. The most common reasons were wound dehiscence or infection in nine elbows (14.5%) and symptomatic hardware in six (9.6%). During multivariate analysis, only olecranon osteotomy remained an independent predictor for reoperation ( P = 0.043). Discussion Despite improved internal fixation techniques, a high proportion of elbows require reoperation after open reduction and internal fixation for distal humerus fractures. Higher complication rates in fractures fixed through an olecranon osteotomy may reflect additional reoperations due to nonunion of the osteotomy or need to remove hardware from the ulna. Level of evidence Prognostic Level III.

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Ramsey ◽  
Andrea K. Bratic ◽  
Charles L. Getz ◽  
Pedro K. Beredjiklian

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny P. Goel ◽  
Jeffrey M. Pike ◽  
George S. Athwal

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 2701-2708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz F. Ahmed ◽  
Ashik Mohsin Parambathkandi ◽  
Wai Jing Geraldine Kong ◽  
Motasem Salameh ◽  
Aiman Mudawi ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To compare the rates of ulnar nerve neuropathy following ulnar nerve subcutaneous anterior transposition versus no transposition during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal humerus fractures. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study at an academic level I trauma centre. A total of 97 consecutive patients with distal humerus fractures underwent ORIF between 2011 and 2018. All included patients were treated with plates (isolated lateral plates excluded) and had no pre-operative ulnar neuropathy. Subcutaneous ulnar nerve anterior transposition was compared versus no transposition at the time of ORIF. The main outcome measure was the rate of ulnar nerve neuropathy. The secondary outcomes were the severity of the ulnar nerve neuropathy and the rate of ulnar nerve recovery. Results Twenty-eight patients underwent subcutaneous ulnar nerve anterior transposition during ORIF, whereas 69 patients had no transposition. Transposition was associated with significantly higher rates of ulnar nerve neuropathy (10/28 versus 10/69; P = 0.027). An adjusted logistic regression model demonstrated an odds ratio of 4.8 (1.3, 17.5; 95% CI) when transposition was performed. Ulnar nerve neuropathy was classified as McGowan grades 1 and 2 in all neuropathy cases in both groups (P = 0.66). Three out of ten cases recovered in the transposition group, and five out of ten cases recovered in the no transposition group over a mean follow-up of 11.2 months (P = 1.00). Conclusion We do not recommend performing routine subcutaneous ulnar nerve anterior transposition during ORIF of distal humerus fracture as it was associated with a significant 5-fold increase in ulnar nerve neuropathy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document