scholarly journals CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: beyond hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591881834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Matutino ◽  
Carla Amaro ◽  
Sunil Verma
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

The development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors has been more prominent in hormone receptor (HR)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers, with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in first and later lines of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) therapy. Preclinical evidence suggests that there is activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in nonluminal cell lines. Here, we present a review of the current preclinical and clinical data on the use of CDK inhibitors in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

scholarly journals Trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy for women with advanced breast cancer positive for hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: a retrospective single-center study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukinori Ozaki ◽  
Yosuke Aoyama ◽  
Jun Masuda ◽  
Lina Inagaki ◽  
Saori Kawai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Abstract Background Trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy is one of the treatment options for patients with hormone receptor- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer; however, there are limited studies evaluating the efficacy of this combination therapy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of women with hormone receptor- and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy between August 1997 and August 2020 at the Cancer Institute Hospital. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival and safety. Results We reviewed the data of 1612 patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, of which 118 patients were diagnosed with hormone receptor- and HER2-positive breast cancer. Of these, 28 patients who received trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy were eligible for this study. The median treatment line for advanced breast cancer was 6 (range, 1–14), the median progression-free survival was 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.46–8.17), and the median overall survival was 35.3 months (95% CI, 20.0–46.7). Of the 28 patients, partial response was observed in 1 (4%), stable disease in 17 (61%), and progressive disease in 10 (36%) patients. The disease control rate was 64%. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were not observed. Conclusions Trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy showed moderate clinical efficacy and no severe toxicity after standard anti-HER2 treatment, which is a reasonable treatment option for patients with hormone receptor- and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. These data contribute to understanding the efficacy of trastuzumab and fulvestrant combination therapy as control data for further development of anti-HER2 agents plus hormone therapy.

scholarly journals Systemic control and encephalic response with lapatinib plus capecitabine as second-line therapy in HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer

ABOUTOPEN ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-115
Author(s):  
Raffaele Ardito ◽  
Fiorella Restaino Marino
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Control ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) oncoprotein in breast cancer patients, is one of the biological characteristics of the disease that determines the choice of appropriate systemic treatment. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman, with relapsing HER2-positive breast cancer in cerebral and pulmonary cells. The patient underwent multimodal first Iine treatment including pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel and panencephalic radiotherapy with good response and progression-free survival for approximately 16 months. Subsequently, further to a encephalic progression of the disease, the patient was treated in second line with the combination lapatinib + capecitabine which induced further encephalic response and disease control for additional 20 months (Oncology).

scholarly journals Role of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in the current and future eras of cancer treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Parylo ◽  
A Vennepureddy ◽  
V Dhar ◽  
P Patibandla ◽  
A Sokoloff
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Human Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, which act by inhibiting progression from the G1 to S phases of the cell cycle, include palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib, and trilaciclib. Palbociclib and ribociclib are currently food and drug administration-approved for use in combination with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. Palbociclib is also food and drug administration-approved for use in combination with fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer progressing after endocrine therapy. Abemaciclib is the newest cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor to gain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, specifically as monotherapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Abemaciclib also shares a similar indication with palbociclib for use in combination with fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer progressing after endocrine therapy. Trilaciclib use remains largely investigational at this time. However, despite FDA-approval for only metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, all four cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have shown promise in hematologic malignancies and non-breast solid tumors. Although further research is needed, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors represent intriguing developments in the treatment of various malignancies, including those with such poor prognoses as glioblastoma multiforme, mantle cell lymphoma, and metastatic melanoma. We discuss the approved indications, current research, and areas of future exploration for palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib, and trilaciclib.

Comparison of therapy benefit from standard anti-HER2 directed approaches in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) between initially HER2-positive patients and patients initially HER2-negative with switch to HER2-positive.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1040-1040
Author(s):  
Hans-Christian Kolberg ◽  
Özlem Yüksel ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
Sara Brucker ◽  
Hans Tesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

1040 Background: Metaanalyses have demonstrated that 5% of initially HER2 negative breast cancer patients switch to HER2 positive during the course of the disease. Whether there is a difference in benefit from standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients initially HER2 positive and patients switching from negative to positive is unclear. We used data from the PRAEGNANT registry to compare the outcome of those patients. Methods: PRAEGNANT is a prospective advanced breast cancer registry (NCT02338167) focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis compared progression-free survival (PFS) with standard HER2 targeted therapies between patients with tumors initially HER2 negative and switched to HER2 positive and patients with tumors that were initially HER2 positive adjusted for age and hormone receptor status. Results: At the time of this analysis 4061 patients with MBC were included in the PRAEGNANT registry, 49 of which met the requirements for this analysis. Median age was 56 (IQR 48-64) years and 87.8% of the patients were hormone receptor positive. At first diagnosis 15 patients were HER2 negative and 34 patients were HER2 positive. Within a median observation time of 9 months (95%CI: 3.8, 23.7) 35 PFS events occurred. Median observation time was 9 months (95% CI: 3.8, 23.7). Initially HER2 positive patients had a longer progression-free survival (HR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.24, 1.03), p = 0.07) as compared to initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive. The 1- and 2-year-PFS rates were also higher for patients initially HER2 positive: 1-year-PFS: 52% (95% CI: 36%, 73%) versus 26 % (95% CI: 12%, 52%); 2-year-PFS: 44% (95% CI: 29%, 67%) versus 19% (95% CI: 7%, 50%). Conclusions: Median PFS and 1- and 2-year PFS rate seem to be better in patients HER2 positive at initial diagnosis receiving standard HER2 directed therapies. Although our result has to be interpreted with caution because of the small cohort and the retrospective nature of our analysis, it justifies prospective research including the group of initially HER2 negative patients switched to HER2 positive as a distinct entity. Clinical trial information: NCT02338167 .

Lapatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Letrozole and Placebo As First-Line Therapy for Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (33) ◽  
pp. 5538-5546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Johnston ◽  
John Pippen ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Mikhail Lichinitser ◽  
Saeed Sadeghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose Cross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) –positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Postmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population. Results In HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; P = .019); median PFS was 8.2 v 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease ≥ 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% v 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% v 1%; rash, 1% v 0%, respectively), but they were manageable. Conclusion This trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document