scholarly journals Reimbursement Pathways for New Diabetes Technologies in Europe: Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-122
Author(s):  
David Seidel ◽  
Francesca Boggio Mesnil ◽  
Antonio Caruso

Reimbursement by payers (policy makers and budget holders) is critical for the uptake and use of new diabetes technologies. The purpose of this article is to describe the different reimbursement pathways that exist for new diabetes technologies in five selected European countries using examples of recent reimbursement decisions. Countries can be grouped into one of three categories: “top-down” (where reimbursement decisions are usually made by policy makers, eg, France), “bottom-up” (where reimbursement decisions are usually made by budget holders, eg, Italy and Spain) and “mixed” (where reimbursement decisions can be made by both policy makers and budget holders, eg, Germany and England). Whatever category a specific country falls into will have different implications from a market access perspective.

Author(s):  
Maria Panagiotopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Stratigea ◽  
Akrivi Leka

This chapter sets up a comprehensive, multidimensional indicator framework for assessing performance of Smart, Sustainable, Resilient, and Inclusive Cities (S2RIC). A thorough review of contemporary, globally-initiated, indicator frameworks that address cities' smartness, sustainability, resilience, and inclusiveness is conducted – top-down approach; coupled with an attempt to integrate the different perspectives explored into a more enriched and coherent indicator framework. This aims at providing assistance to urban planners and policy makers in assessing, monitoring, managing cities, and making more informed sustainability decisions; while keeping in track with new concerns in the urban planning realm (e.g. resilience, disaster reduction) and recently endorsed global sustainability goals and frameworks. An indicators' selection process is also illustrated – bottom-up approach – for navigating in the proposed framework and identifying appropriate city- and citizen-specific indicators for carrying out relevant assessments and guiding sound policies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-539
Author(s):  
K. Balamurugan

What are the challenges in public policy processes? Why do some critical public problems not carry to the agenda-setting of policy-making, or even if carried, they fail during implementation? One of the responses to these queries is that policy-making often happens in a complex, dynamic, sociopolitical environment where there are overarching structures above the policy makers and there are competing actors, ideas, groups, policy networks, institutions and policy subsystem that interact with unequal power and conflicting interests (Sanderson, 2009). It is thus realised that the systematic study of public policy is significant for bringing progressive change in society. Hence it is required to build new knowledge and to improve upon the working of public policy. This article will study the value of the top down and bottom up theories in the case of implementation of a new eGovernance policy on passport issuance in India. The findings are that due to resistance from different stakeholders, the project could be implemented only after certain bottom up changes to the policy along with change management strategies.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Cole
Keyword(s):  
Top Down ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document